Indian Missiles and Guided Munitions

[Big_Strong_Brother_India]

 

[Big_Strong_Brother_India]

another version of NASM-SR is also under development to replace Israeli Popeye in service

 

[Hmm]

NASM-MR anti-ship cruise missile, as well as AD-1 and AD-2 of Ballistic Missile Defence programme successfully tested!
View attachment 201450

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

If I'm not wrong - only 4 countries have the capability to counter ICBM
USA
Russia
China
India

 

[NeptunesVortex]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Big_Strong_Brother_India]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Pin point accuracy.... Our very own HIMARS

 

[onlinpunit]

Key specs of Pinaka LRGR :

• Maximum Strike Range: Up to 120 kilometres
• Guidance System: Integrated INS, GPS, and NavIC
• Maximum Speed: Mach 4.7.
• Peak Altitude: 40 kilometres.
• Payload Capacity: ~250 kilograms.
• Salvo Rate: 12 rockets in 44 seconds.
• Launcher Platform: Standard 8x8 Tatra high-mobility truck.

Types of war heads :
Pre-Fragmented High Explosive
Anti-Tank Cluster Bomblets (DPICM)
Area Denial Anti-Personnel & Anti-Tank Mines (ADM)
Incendiary Payload

 

[NeptunesVortex]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[maverick]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

any further details on LRLACM ?

 

[Corax]

This should be in the relevant thread.

any further details on LRLACM ?

It's a follow on from the failed nirbay CM. They're still "developing" it, no operational cruise missile.

 

[GatlingGunZ]

any further details on LRLACM ?

Tests with Russian engine were successful. Now we have tested it successfully with indigenous Manik engine for LRLACM in 2024. series production engiens already ordered and delivered.

DRDO test-fires ‘Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile'

India's state-owned Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) test-fired its ‘Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile (ITCM)' from the Integrated Test Range...

www.janes.com

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This should be in the relevant thread.



It's a follow on from the failed nirbay CM. They're still "developing" it, no operational cruise missile.

Cope ?

 

[NeptunesVortex]

This should be in the relevant thread.



It's a follow on from the failed nirbay CM. They're still "developing" it, no operational cruise missile.

Oh hello,

Nirbhay failed? LR-LACM exists precisely because India retained and matured the critical technologies instead of abandoning the programme. Airframe, guidance, seekers, mission computer and now the indigenous Manik small turbofan engine India is building the entire ecosystem.

By the way, did Pakistan ever fully operationalise Raad on its intended platforms? Weren't there persistent integration issues with the JF-17, including pylon/ground clearance complications, leaving the ageing Mirage III/V as the practical carrier? Even after years of Raad-2 announcements, where's the evidence of widespread operational deployment? So LRLACM is just a failed Nirbhay but your much over hyped Raad didn't make an appearance when the IAF was carrying out precision strikes during Operation Sindoor? Strange. If a weapon is truly operational and reliable, you'd expect it to be used in a major conflict. Maybe answer that before taking shots at missiles of other countries. Sit down.

It's a bit rich to mock a missile still in development when your own ALCM programme has struggled with platform integration. India is atleast developing indigenous propulsion and avionics. Pakistan's own Raad programme still has unanswered questions about full operational deployment. For years, Pakistan has had to rely on foreign help for several key technologies and integration work.

India, on the other hand, has spent years building the difficult stuff at home: engines, seekers, guidance systems and missile electronics. That's exactly why projects like LRLACM are possible.

 

[Corax]

Oh hello,

Nirbhay failed? LR-LACM exists precisely because India retained and matured the critical technologies instead of abandoning the programme. Airframe, guidance, seekers, mission computer and now the indigenous Manik small turbofan engine India is building the entire ecosystem.

By the way, did Pakistan ever fully operationalise Raad on its intended platforms? Weren't there persistent integration issues with the JF-17, including pylon/ground clearance complications, leaving the ageing Mirage III/V as the practical carrier? Even after years of Raad-2 announcements, where's the evidence of widespread operational deployment?

It's a bit rich to mock a missile still in development when your own ALCM programme has struggled with platform integration. India is atleast developing indigenous propulsion and avionics. Pakistan's own Raad programme still has unanswered questions about full operational deployment. For years, Pakistan has had to rely on foreign help for several key technologies and integration work.

India, on the other hand, has spent years building the difficult stuff at home: engines, seekers, guidance systems and missile electronics. That's exactly why projects like LRLACM are possible.

Wait until Raad is fully proven across all its intended platforms before declaring LRLACM dead. Building these technologies yourself is a lot harder than making fun of someone else's development programme.

Pakistan developed and deployed two main types of cruise missile for over 20 years now, not sure what point you're trying to make.

Yes, you should keep thinking there's issues with deploying Raad or Taimor.




I never made any comparison with Pakistan's cruise missiles, because there is no comparison, you don't have an operational CM whereas Pakistan has for over 20 years.

How am I mocking you if you've just confirmed you're still "developing" a cruise missile? that's exactly what I said.

 

[maverick]

This should be in the relevant thread.



It's a follow on from the failed nirbay CM. They're still "developing" it, no operational cruise missile.

Isn't Brahamos considered a supersonic Cruise missile ?

 

[vayu]

Pakistan developed and deployed two main types of cruise missile for over 20 years now, not sure what point you're trying to make.

Yes, you should keep thinking there's issues with deploying Raad or Taimor.

View attachment 201821


I never made any comparison with Pakistan's cruise missiles, because there is no comparison, you don't have an operational CM whereas Pakistan has for over 20 years.

How am I mocking you if you've just confirmed you're still "developing" a cruise missile? that's exactly what I said.

I wonder why indegenous pakistani cruise missiles never used in OP sindhoor? if it had it operational, It could have safely launched it far away from S400 reach. I belive Raad has a range of 600KM( as Chatgpt says)it could have easily made a huge impact

 

[NeptunesVortex]

Isn't Brahamos considered a supersonic Cruise missile ?

BrahMos is a lot more than "just a supersonic cruise missile." You clearly have no idea how many upgrades it has received over the years in terms of range, guidance, accuracy and operational flexibility. And that's just what's publicly known.