Indian Navy News & Discussions

Try to save your countrymen caught by these Somali pirates then.
Lucky we are there to do favours for different nations.

So, nothing to do with upholding the rule of law.

Everything to do with publicity-rich gestures, according to you.

If only the Indian Navy knew how foolish Indians are behaving, and disgracing them.
 
Yesterday the poor bangladeshis were begging to somalians on SM to let go of their sailors.
And today for the nth time Bharat came to their rescue.
But still they will remain thankless.
Don't be condescending and arrogant.

Try to get some perspective.

People like you make a laughing stock of all Indians everywhere.
 
Yeah onboard CQBs aren't gonna make you battle hardened, "save our ship pleej saar" is gonna make you battle hardened? I mean why even attempt at trolling?
You have a point.

Trolling is an Indian fanboy speciality, and amateurs should not interfere.
 
What communication medium Bangladesh even has, using which you can directly communicate with these pirates on your own ??
Find out.

Nobody sits on a dinghy in the middle of the ocean talking to Somali pirates.

This is a sophisticated racket, and ransom demands are routed through the main commercial centres.
 
Nothing is disgraceful there. A Bangladeshi member in bad faith tried to downplay of our Navy, and he was put to his place.
There was no downplaying. He merely stated facts. One incident against starveling Somali pirates does not amount to battle-hardening. I was not interested in defending him. I was horrified at the arrogance of some Indian posters. What were you trying to do, make laughing stocks of us?


You are laughing at and bashing your own countrymen , liking the comment of Afif , meanwhile he was shamelessly posting 2 penny fake news which said that the rescue operation is fake.
His posts should not bother you. your posts should bother you. Also, you seem to have difficulty in comprehending. He said Indian media was spreading fake news, not that the rescue was fake.
Learn to read.
 
His posts should not bother you. your posts should bother you.

Why ? It's a forum , we are not here to make friends with those who came in bad faith. So everyone is free to bash anyone within the rules of forum.
 
Why ? It's a forum , we are not here to make friends with those who came in bad faith. So everyone is free to bash anyone within the rules of forum.
You continue to have difficulties with understanding what is written to you.

Instead of looking at the bad posts made by others, and judging them, you should look at the bad posts you have made, and correct yourself.
 
There was no downplaying. He merely stated facts. One incident against starveling Somali pirates does not amount to battle-hardening

They looked pretty healthy to me when brought here. Getting good ransom I guess.
Also some pirate squads are equipped with frickin .50 cal . we've used multiple assets and platforms to conduct the whole raid. Some acts might be over the top , still we got to assess the combined ops of our assets in high sea. I see it good combat experience even if it went without bloodshed.
 
They looked pretty healthy to me when brought here. Getting good ransom I guess.
Also some pirate squads are equipped with frickin .50 cal . we've used multiple assets and platforms to conduct the whole raid. Some acts might be over the top , still we got to assess the combined ops of our assets in high sea. I see it good combat experience even if it went without bloodshed.
A good exercise, and I have defended it, although the question might be asked why our ships do not have an infantry component equivalent to the Royal Marines. Taking that as a given, that we are what we are, we used our Air Force in excellent coordination with the Navy.

Did I not defend that at every opportunity? Or were you sleeping?

My objection is to using silly terms like battle hardened. That is a term that will make every other nation's members laugh at us.
 
A good exercise, and I have defended it, although the question might be asked why our ships do not have an infantry component equivalent to the Royal Marines. Taking that as a given, that we are what we are, we used our Air Force in excellent coordination with the Navy.
We are new Yes we totally lack amphibious assault wing. Some of our ships carry Marcos, some don't.
This time we either didn't have or as I said , we went "over the top" with C17-paradropping for testing purpose .
 
We are new Yes we totally lack amphibious assault wing. Some of our ships carry Marcos, some don't.
This time we either didn't have or as I said , we went "over the top" with C17-paradropping for testing purpose .
You seem to have no idea about the conversation we are having.

It is not about the mechanics of the incident.

It is about our - Indian civilians' - reactions.

It is about our exaggerated descriptions, our use of the expression battle-hardened.

I do not like the Chinese, or the Pakistanis, laughing at us.
 
We are new Yes we totally lack amphibious assault wing. Some of our ships carry Marcos, some don't.
This time we either didn't have or as I said , we went "over the top" with C17-paradropping for testing purpose .
We have spent enough time on this issue of over-vaulting language and the impression it makes on others.

If you want to continue, do so; how others waste their time is not my business.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top