'Indus Water Treaty Not feasible to maintain': India serves notice to Pakistan, seeks Modification.

[Jaeger]

It is useless to abrogate the treaty. The Indus river water cannot be transferred to other Indian states easily, will take an engineering marvel worth tens of billions of dollars to do it. Rajasthan and to some extent Northern Gujarat are the only water stressed regions in India and they are far away from the Indus river. As another poster said, easier to build multiple desalination plants.

India should start work on the Kalpasar project, we’ll have more then enough water than we need.

Kalpasar Project - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The fisrt step should be to link the 6 Indus rivers.

That will greatly increase the water flow in 3 Eastern rivers especially in lean months.

There after infrastructure is already in place to divert the waters of Eastern rivers to water scrace regions like Rajasthan, like the Indra Gandhi and Rajasthan Canals.

 

[LostArrow]

Why this treaty even lingering? Signed in return of goodwill but Pakistan has been net exporter of terrorism.

 

[That_Guy]

Ideally this treaty should have been done and dusted the moment Pakistan invaded in 65. Now you're writing useless letters. Make some noise, maybe you'll get something

Wars don't annul treaties.

 

[LostArrow]

Wars don't annul treaties.

What does?

 

[That_Guy]

No, our Punjab and Haryana will use it for crops. These two states grow more grain than whole Pakistan combined.

It will look lollypop till it won't.
Then Pakistan will be caught pants down with Indian dam already built, and would run towards international tribunals when it's too late.

Pakistan’s request on controversial Indian hydropower projects to be heard by permanent court of arbitration on July 5

ISLAMABAD: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague will hearPakistan's request tomorrow (5th July) regarding the construction of the controversial Kishanganga and Ratle hydroelectric p

profit.pakistantoday.com.pk

Wishful thinking.

India can build dams, but it can't reduce Pakistan's water without facing penalties.

 

[GatlingGun]

Wishful thinking.

India can build dams, but it can't reduce Pakistan's water without facing penalties.

It's your wishful thinking that Pakistan can extract any penalties from India.

 

[That_Guy]

It's your wishful thinking that Pakistan can extract any penalties from India.

It won't be Pakistan extracting penalties.

You overestimate India's capabilities and influence.

 

[RHCP]

Sooner or later, with or without treaties, some of "pakistans" water will be taken. Naive to think otherwise. And not because india wants to be cruel or something. India just needs the water as much as pakistan does - can't blame india for thinking about Indians first.

 

[GatlingGun]

It won't be Pakistan extracting penalties.

You overestimate India's capabilities and influence.

We will see.

 

[drkrn86]

See above, China will support for sure and the base of these rivers starts in China as well.


International community will see that India doesn't stick to treaties.

Anyway let's see what modi and his rabid crew will do his been barking about this since 2016 he can keep barking.

China will support for sure is an assumption. On what grounds will it support pakistan when it doesn't follow any international rules on water sharing? Very unlikely. At the most it will ask India to stick to agreed Treaty.

Regarding international community, Well, this treaty was brokered and signed atleast 6 decades ago. None of the original signatories are alive. Even the ground realities have changed. Global warming, erratic rainfall, overpopulation etc. I hope the world will take note of this and agree to our reasonable demand.

Regarding Modi, Modi Hai toh mucking Hai. Haters can keep sulking.

 

[drkrn86]

Article 370 was a clause in Indian constitution which means nothing to Pakistan

In fact Pakistan changed status of GB despite India's protests years before India abrogated article 370

I don't know why you guys take changing your own constitution as some sort of act of bravado

Exactly, there was no bravado in abrogated that stupid clause. It's mainly to show our anti national politicians that "Pakistan will attack" is a dud and BJP has the political will.

 

[drkrn86]

And what are you to do with all the water of three rivers? Bhagwan Modi would drink all of it??

You low IQ morons are given new lollypop by BJP after recent continuous deaths of your security forces in IOK and as expected you started sucking without asking important questions

What we do with our share is none of your concern.

Rather than worrying about our soldiers, act for your fallen people in acts of terrorism.

 

[drkrn86]

Wars don't annul treaties.

But treaties get suspended automatically.

 

[drkrn86]

It won't be Pakistan extracting penalties.

So who will?
Capabilities are relative.

 

[Jaeger]

Wars don't annul treaties.

However countries annul treaties even without wars.

US withdrew from INF treaty with Russia in 2019.

US also withdrew from anti ballistic missile treaty with Russia in 2002.

Russia withdrew from START treaty in 2010.