'Indus Water Treaty Not feasible to maintain': India serves notice to Pakistan, seeks Modification.

[That_Guy]

Basically your whole UN, Vienna convention, respect of laws and whatever BS you just blurt out in the past went out of the window as soon as you heard China. LMFAO.

We all hear this argument you'll never be this or that, India is not trying to be China anyway. We have our own position of power to fill. Not today, not tomorrow maybe it won't even happen in our life time.

Except you didn't read my comments from the beginning. I didn't just mention China, I also mentioned the US and Russia as well.

If you want to make a convincing argument, it's best not to lie.

 

[That_Guy]

Oh yeah, while you're preaching those international laws. China claimed nine dash lines as their own despite a court ruling against it violating provisions of UNCLOS. The Chinese claimed territories passes through EEZ or even internationally recognised boundaries, islands of different countries.

Now I'm not saying India is China..... Yet

You literally suggesting India wants to be like China.

Lmao

 

[Jaeger]

Not true. First thing would be established is if it has jurisdiction on the matter, and similar cases in the past have shown it does. Second, you don't have to accept its authority to be a party in the proceedings.

Finally, go ahead and try to get out of the treaty unilaterally. See what happens.

No you are wrong.

A Court of arbitration has no power to enforce its rulings.

 

[That_Guy]

No you are wrong.

A Court of arbitration has no power to enforce its rulings.

No court has technical power to enforce its rulings, but it gives legitimacy which can cause enforcement by other means. For example, if a decision is made one way or another, it could force third party nations to switch recognition of the new reality and enforce sanctions.

You're being obtuse.

If India was confident it could do this, it would have done so a long time ago.

 

[Jaeger]

No court has technical power to enforce its rulings, but it gives legitimacy which can cause enforcement by other means. For example, if a decision is made one way or another, it could force third party nations to switch recognition of the new reality and enforce sanctions.

You're being obtuse.

If India was confident it could do this, it would have done so a long time ago.

1. Most courts have powers to enforce its rulings, be it criminal or civil courts.

2. However court of arbitration is a court where both parties have voluntarily accept that they will accept its ruling.

When and if times comes, and India decides to aborogate the treaty, no court arbitration will be able to stop it.

 

[irishman]

The Treaty will be legally and within the framework in the treaty , will be revised to make it equitable but the timeline and step by step process will be slow....gradual....no arbit emotional decisions here. Intent has been communicated formally as a first step.

Pakistanis threats on this forum is pointless and typical of them. All these process of demography change in Kashmir or IWT etc is a project which will get realized ...in a gradual way over decades.

From 80% to 50% to Pakistan in our life and later from 50% to 30% ....or whatever.


Why so heart burɓ

Re