Mr Iran Eye
Registered Member
Haaaa Father Raptor and his propaganda, do we love him!!!


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are for bombing areas without air defense
But better for Iran to fight then NOW while they are stuck in Ukraine and drained logistically, financially and politically than to wait some more years for NATO to recover from the Ukraine disaster and focus solely on Iran.Iran has to fight USA, Jordan, Turkey, UK, France and others all just to fight Israel
And still we do it.
agreed.main advantage of launching strikes from Iraq is the proximity to Israel
West Iraq is < 500km from Israel, meaning Iran can use more accurate SRBMs such as Fateh-313 and Raad-500
Its probably not that difficult, because since Saddam was overthrown, and Iran setup and armed its allied Iraqi militias like Badr, Kataib Hezbollah, PMU etc, Southern Iraq,especially Basra, are more under Iranian control than Iraq- so Iran has had (and taken advantage of) all its open access into Iraq through southern Iraq.the difficulty is transporting those missiles in sufficient numbers to West Iraq and then the logistics of launching them simultaneously without being spotted
so overall it seems quite unlikely
Well, Houthis that are a sea away and 100s of miles away from Iran already has HGV- the Palestina -2, so can you image what Iraq that is just next door has received from Iran all this while? Iran is quiet about somethings in Iraq because of Iraq's sensitivity about its sovereingnty- Iran has already prepped Iraq as its twin resistance front and base- for a hint of this, look at all the drones and missiles Iraqi resistance forces have fired into Israel.Unless Iraqi militia are already armed with Fateh-313 in decent numbers (still unlikely). Syria is an operator of Fateh-313, for example.
It has a 370 Km range. At this range, interceptors can attack the bomber.No, B-52s can fire 20 JASSM-ER stealth cruise missiles.
What interceptors?It has a 370 Km range. At this range, interceptors can attack the bomber.
And the group that is supposed to defend the strategic bomber need a carrier or a base to operate.
At the range of 300-2000 Km, we can destroy every American asset including ACs and airabses.
Dont count on that platform too much.
Western intelligence reports are usually true & reliableThe major problem with that propaganda is that a majority of people believes in it
As an example you can look the Wikipedia page which massively relays this propaganda and writes that Iran has suffered a major blow and that Iran missile program is delayed for 6 months, and other absurd claims
Iran needs its own propaganda destined to western people, like China Daily or RT, PressTV doesn't work well in the west because it doesn't adapt to western mindset and habits
Best thing to do is to not listen those western prediction, they are serial liars
Our launchers & platforms have been charged and are prepared to respond to any potential aggression from the Zionist regime.
![]()
He added that Iran’s multilayered defense is in full readiness:
“Many of our missile launch platforms have not yet been used, and if aggression occurs, we will use missiles for the first time that have destructive power that will astonish the world.”
Esmail Kowsari also denied CNN’s claims of Iran’s speculated time to attack, and said:
The timing and method of Iran’s response have not been finalized, and any action will be coordinated with our...
"The timing and method of Iran’s response have not been finalized, and any action will be coordinated with our allies in the region"
I'm ready to wait for weeks and even months
Where is the proof of this claim?I’ve not seen anyone say all Iranian air defenses were destroyed outside some randos on X. Only the S-300 systems at strategic sites.
And B-52s can fire 20 JASSM-ER stealth cruise missiles.
You can more or less see the big picture of their escalation plan:Where is the proof of this claim?
There are S300 in Iran in many places where no explosions have been reported.
Stealth cruise missiles are dangerous, but any attack on Iran will have consequences.
If America fire 20 cruise missiles ,200 ballistic missiles will hit Al-Udeid base in Qatar.
Even the bases of Diego Garcia and Rammstein are accessible to Iran
Honestly I sleep easier if I knew where I live is protected by 3rd of khordad and 15th of khordad or Arman instead of any S300 or S400I don´t agree.
Iran has probably reserve air defenses storaged. Maybe there are not last generation Bavar 373 MKII or S300PMU-2, but for sure Iran retains in storage from Khordad´s 3 or Tabas Air defense systems not to tell any S200 storaged.
And day after day must be producing more system in a basis of 24/7. So probably in few weeks damaged systems will be repaired and in a month or two new systems would be introduced in service.
B52 are for launching ABM or cruise missiles IMO. Those obviously cannot even reach the border safely.
It has a 370 Km range. At this range, interceptors can attack the bomber.
And the group that is supposed to defend the strategic bomber need a carrier or a base to operate.
At the range of 300-2000 Km, we can destroy every American asset including ACs and airabses.
Dont count on that platform too much.
I would not even answer to this, and even less in claims that are not backed by facts and material proof but articles from hasbara department and "anonymous sources" concerning S-300Where is the proof of this claim?
There are S300 in Iran in many places where no explosions have been reported.
Stealth cruise missiles are dangerous, but any attack on Iran will have consequences.
If America fire 20 cruise missiles ,200 ballistic missiles will hit Al-Udeid base in Qatar.
Even the bases of Diego Garcia and Rammstein are accessible to Iran
Oh bhai……what happened in third class Afghanistan? Why none of what you said made a diff?B52 has very important role
Once B-2 ,F35 or Raptors sanitize the area by destroying the ADS, B52 can take up the lead for mass destruction or heavy payload strikes on underground facilities since high sortie rates will be required for that purpose.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.