Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE do you know how to write? This is not a platform to promote X with all sorts of nonsense.

I never seen you write a post with good content.
………..yes thank you 🙏 this bot is pissing me off even if I have it on ignore 🤦‍♂️ it goes from useful to utter utter annoying distortion and lies
 
@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE do you know how to write? This is not a platform to promote X with all sorts of nonsense.

I never seen you write a post with good content.
I used to write a lot when I had time. I also usually avoid arguments. For the short time I come to this forum, the tweets I post portray my views.
 
US with all its ISR assets watching Iran counting everything in Support of Entity. who is providing details of entity preps to Iran?

any idea?
 
I used to write a lot when I had time. I also usually avoid arguments. For the short time I come to this forum, the tweets I post portray my views.

I am not against what you do here, I am ok for you being what you are but out of curiocity, If your posts portray your views than don't you think you surely have very vast view point and often quite contradictory too. ;)
 
This is just your speculation. Here are some of his quotes:

"Get it over with and let’s get back to peace and stop killing people. And that’s a very simple statement" - April 2024.

"I did encourage him to get this over with. You want to get it over with fast. Have victory, get your victory, and get it over with. It has to stop, the killing has to stop" - August 2024

There are several other examples. Can you share anything similar the democrats have said?

"Get it over with" means finish them off.

As others have mentioned, Trump has cut off the Palestinians from talks, he has used the word 'Palestinian' as an insult in the debates, and has a history of recognizing contested areas as part of Israel (Jerusalem, Golan heights). Trump signed the 'Muslim ban' and has vowed to reinstate and expand it to more countries.

Neither side is a friend of Muslims or Palestinians, both sides are strongly pro-Israel, but only Trump actively hates Muslims. He plays nice with the GCC Arabs only because it helps his private businesses.
 
Spectator is so unreliable it's not even funny. This was all started by a rumor on Twitter.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Spectator is so unreliable it's not even funny. This was all started by a rumor on Twitter.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Usually the US will say very loudly that Iran is going to launch an attack, usually 1-4 hours before it, like in TP1 and 2

And when i say the US i'm talking about the US directly, not "anonymous US sources that told WSJ/NYT/Axios"
 
@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE do you know how to write? This is not a platform to promote X with all sorts of nonsense.

I never seen you write a post with good content.
Fool is such a joker, he only learnt to use 4 key combinations. Ctrl-c and Ctrl-v. Or copy and paste… he is incapable of anything else…
 
"Get it over with" means finish them off.

As others have mentioned, Trump has cut off the Palestinians from talks, he has used the word 'Palestinian' as an insult in the debates, and has a history of recognizing contested areas as part of Israel (Jerusalem, Golan heights). Trump signed the 'Muslim ban' and has vowed to reinstate and expand it to more countries.

Neither side is a friend of Muslims or Palestinians, both sides are strongly pro-Israel, but only Trump actively hates Muslims. He plays nice with the GCC Arabs only because it helps his private businesses.

You're selectively reading, right after "get it over with" he says killing has to stop. Plus he can say what he wants to rile up support since the American public is mostly ignorant of foreign affairs.

Between the last 4 American presidents under which one were the least Muslim casualties? Trump. Less war is good for Trump's personal image and since he's egotistical my wager is he's better for Gazan civilians.

Neither side is a friend of Muslims that's true but as reality requires picking the lesser of two evils I would say that's Trump - based on his actions as well as rhetoric. If you can give me examples of similar rhetoric from Democrats I'll take it into consideration but their actions speak much louder.

In the end it is the fault of Muslims to behave like helpless infants having to choose poison or poison.
 
You're selectively reading, right after "get it over with" he says killing has to stop.

Yeah, once you finish someone off, there is no one else left to kill so the killing stops.

Plus he can say what he wants to rile up support since the American public is mostly ignorant of foreign affairs.

He doesn't just say these things, he believes it from the depth of his xenophobic personality. He doesn't care about anyone but himself. He doesn't care about Jews or Muslims, but Jews are rich and powerful in America while Muslims aren't, so he will do what is best for his personal interests. I already explained it above.

He has gone out of this way to do things he didn't have to do, like the 'Muslim ban'.

Between the last 4 American presidents under which one were the least Muslim casualties?

It is true Democrats have started more wars but Trump is not a true Republican. He is pathologically racist in his foreign policy: hardcore against China and Iran, but very soft on Russia because they are white.

Trump. Less war is good for Trump's personal image

By less war he means no American casualties. He doesn't give a damn how many Muslims die in foreign lands.

In the end it is the fault of Muslims to behave like helpless infants having to choose poison or poison.

A better logic would be for Muslims to smack down Trump a second time so he never runs again. The Republican party has ZERO voices for Palestinians support but the Democratic party has many such voices.

Results are achieved by thinking rationally through the consequences of one's actions, not by throwing emotional tantrums.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top