Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Syria needs to rebuild with this kind of anti-tank tools as this war may spread from Lebanon to Syria to capture more territory beyond the golan heights.
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Syria needs to rebuild with this kind of anti-tank tools as this war may spread from Lebanon to Syria to capture more territory beyond the golan heights.
kobra
Registered Member
Thing is that they were no lost. They were not trying to save themselves. If they wanted to hide, im sure 1.6m sq.km is enough to hide somewhere in iran, even if we forget 100s of missile cities buried deep under mountains or what not. Why ppl are not getting it.
Nearly all of them died at their home, their office or at relatives house. Unlike 12 day war, where israil/mossad delivered the most lethal assasination mission in history while targeting irgc bunker meeting, this time it was not something extra ordinary but obviously good enough..
Call them maniacs, suicidal, tired of life, hungry for martyrdom whatever suits your intellect!
Mobius
Elite Member
As reality hits, they'll be cancelling many more of these multi-billion dollar vanity projects. If only they had the brains to invest in home grown defence projects & R&D. But alas, they were too busy enjoying Ukrainian women and other luxuries of life.......
kobra
Registered Member
I dont think so that iranians are creating these AI. Must be chinese, detailing is too damn high haha.
albritani
Registered Member
Don't think it would make a difference, 30 million people and if they are anything like the Saudis I've met they are often fat, lazy and haven't done anything honest days work in their life.
Aggregate
Registered Member
Translated: Hezbollah ambushed an enemy force attempting to advance from the outskirts of the town of Bayada towards the town of Shamaa. Upon reaching the western edge of the town, the fighters engaged them with light and medium weapons, inflicting direct hits. Three rescue helicopters are heading north to evacuate wounded Israeli soldiers.
They're getting massacred at the hands of Hezbollah after 40 years of bombardments on Lebanon.
Not sure what they are thinking, trying to enter Iran.
Last edited:
Aggregate
Registered Member
7th Day of nonstop fires at Kuwait Airport. Seaport also under nonstop attacks.
Does not seem like they will be able to launch an attack from Kuwait, UAE will probably get their wish to serve the zionists.
Rational Philosopher
Trusted Member
Pakistani exports to Iran to be fast-tracked and rules lifted admist difficulties of the Iranian people during war in finding supplies!
Meengla
Elite Member
You quoted a thoughtful post by @Gryzor . However, I tend to agree with this article in today's NY Times by Michelle Goldberg. She maybe yet another knee-jerk anti-Trump on NY Times but she is right in saying that the American market/stocks are one thing which have some influence over Trump and that this war is already going bad. This article also discusses how, after a confidential briefing on Wednesday (25 March), even Republican Congressmen are not satisfied. IMO: While there is the possibility of another Vietnam, I personally think that is the lesser chance than a chance of the war of attrition as going on already if not a quick winding down.
It is not just Democrats in Congress who fear that Donald Trump’s war in Iran is going sideways. After a classified Pentagon briefing on Wednesday, Republican lawmakers on the House Armed Services Committee appeared shaken.
“We will not sacrifice American lives for the same failed foreign policies,” said Nancy Mace, warning about the possibility of American troops in Iran. The committee chair, Mike Rogers, complained that members aren’t getting nearly enough information about war plans. Troop movements, he said, should be “thoughtful and deliberate.” The implication was that they might not be.
“This is the first week where I have felt that there’s been really any resistance to this war from Republicans,” Jason Crow, a combat veteran and Democratic member of the committee, told me. His colleagues’ public comments, he suggested, only hint at the depth of their anxiety. In closed meetings, he said, they express many concerns “that they’re unwilling to show publicly.”
...
ut at least some of the Republicans hearing directly from the Pentagon aren’t so sanguine. “On a bipartisan basis, it was pretty clear to us that there was no plan, no strategy,” said Sara Jacobs, another Democratic member of the committee. The briefers, she said, “could not articulate an end game, and we are three weeks into this war.”
The big question now is if an American ground invasion is imminent. I suspect people are underestimating the possibility because it’s such a manifestly terrible idea. Americans certainly don’t want to see troops on the ground: In a Reuters/Ipsos poll last week, only 34 percent of respondents said they would back the deployment of Special Forces soldiers into Iran, and a mere 7 percent support a larger-scale attack. The markets — one of the few forces that can constrain Trump — seem to assume a relatively quick resolution to the war, which is likely why oil prices haven’t risen as much as some anticipated.
Trump himself appears to be wary of letting his Iran misadventure drag on. The Wall Street Journal reports that he wants a speedy end to the war, and at times he seems to be begging Iran’s leaders to make a deal. “They better get serious soon, before it is too late, because once that happens, there is NO TURNING BACK,” he posted on Thursday morning. You could almost see the flop sweat wafting off him.
Yet despite all the reasons America shouldn’t escalate its war with Iran, there’s a good chance it will. Trump is sending thousands more troops to the Middle East, and in the past, when he’s massed military forces outside a hostile country, he’s used them. “Some U.S. officials think a crushing show of force to conclude the fighting would create more leverage in peace talks or simply give Trump something to point to and declare victory,” Axios reported on Thursday.
Jacobs, the Democratic congresswoman, told me that the Pentagon’s request for $200 billion to fund a war that’s burning through hundreds of millions of dollars a day is a tell. “That’s not a one-time cost to wrap things up,” she said. “That’s a down payment on a long war.”
This would not, obviously, be the first time the United States ramped up a war of choice just to avoid a humiliating defeat. In his memoir, former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara wrote about how, during the Vietnam War, the C.I.A. warned that failure “would be damaging to U.S. prestige,” leading the United States to prolong a pointless conflict in the hope of saving face. During years of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, Crow recalled, military leaders would repeatedly claim “that one more big troop surge, one more big offensive, would get it done and put us in a better position and win the war.”
Never before, however, has America arrived at the threshold of a quagmire so quickly, with so much advance warning about the precise errors it was making. We have spent much of the past decade — in no small part due to Trump’s election — reckoning with the cost of the Iraq war to global stability and American cohesion. For the first time I can remember, both major parties have significant, influential antiwar contingents. Trump ran for president, however mendaciously, as the peace candidate, claiming that Kamala Harris would lead America into World War III.
And yet here we are, lurching toward a new version of a familiar catastrophe, suffering from some national form of neurotic repetition compulsion. “This is like the horrible, lame-dad cover band version of the worst of American foreign policy,” said Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy.
Someday, perhaps, when we’re picking up the pieces from yet another ill-conceived war, Republicans will explain that behind the scenes, they opposed it. One of the biggest problems in Congress, said Crow, is the gap between what people say privately and their willingness to demonstrate “the strength of their convictions” in public. “I’m always trying to close that gap with folks, and I always remind people that it’s never too late to do the right thing,” he said. He may be right, but the sooner the better.
KingQamaR
Elite Member
Totally Brother
Iran is freeing all the Arabs from US imperialism and occupation from their lands. Kind of strong example of why these Middle Eastern puppet countries need to “maybe start “ policing” their neighbourhood alone or jointly with Iran. And stop relying on the US and Israel they have deliberately ruined your GCC COUNTRIES economically for decades to come, tourism was the primary vehicle for all of them was to move beyond oil! That’s now wrecked.
PakistaniDefender
Registered Member
Why they Want us to see?Important Caveat - As with all things "OSINT" these are the things they "WANT" us to see... Remember:
mangekyo
Trusted Member
It will become even emptier if they send their only fans army to Iran
SilentWatch
Registered Member
SOMEONE anyone give India a role? Maybe to sprinkle rose water and have a dancer at the welcome of the Islamabad accords
They can welcome Iran and JDV etc… when they arrive
They can welcome Iran and JDV etc… when they arrive
Taimoor
Elite Member
MBZ signed "strategic" alliance with Modi's India. He can always pick his phone and ring delhi.
