BananaRepublic
Trusted Member
we have to find a solution to these tankers ...
launch a damn 358 missile from a fishing boat in the middle of the Persian Gulf for god's sake.
That’s not what you do when your strategy is to timeout Trump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we have to find a solution to these tankers ...
launch a damn 358 missile from a fishing boat in the middle of the Persian Gulf for god's sake.
Not a Muslim thing to do.Iran has every right on earth to target US civilians
his is just posturing. There is no way in military science that the US can wrestle control of hormuz from iran. Simple logic. One side has to simply harrass ships, the other side needs to guarantee full safety of the entire persian gulf. Good luck with that.
Tbf, it was not probable at all back then.چیف میں نے یہ بات مہینوں پہلے کہی تھی اور یہاں کے تمام چمپو اس پر ہنس پڑے تھے....
They got 17 Irani islands to choose from!
Chief, remember........FPV only has 58 km range.......Most of these Islands are far out in the middle of the gulf:Tbf, it was not probable at all back then.
The circumstances have changed now. USA doesn't want a repeat of the stalemate from before. Trump personally wants a rapid victory.
As @Watandar said, it may just be Spec Ops raids. It may be occupying a single island and then getting Arabs to station themselves and be meat shields. One of these outcomes is very plausible now. Was not the case back then.
But whatever form it takes, it is likely to be Iran's one and ONLY opportunity to inflict enough casualties on USA to force them to rethink their approach.

Iran can do a 4x4 loaded with bombs attack on a barrack inside the US
At least 100 bodybags guaranteed with such an attack
I guess I need a twitter account now they won’t let you watch videos otherwise![]()
Tbf, it was not probable at all back then.
The circumstances have changed now. USA doesn't want a repeat of the stalemate from before. Trump personally wants a rapid victory.
As @Watandar said, it may just be Spec Ops raids. It may be occupying a single island and then getting Arabs to station themselves and be meat shields. One of these outcomes is very plausible now. Was not the case back then.
But whatever form it takes, it is likely to be Iran's one and ONLY opportunity to inflict enough casualties on USA to force them to rethink their approach.
@F22 Raptor @Hamartia Antidote targeting hospitals now; what do your cia handlers say about this?They are targeting hospitals now whats Iran's answer ?
Some good news about the Israeli attempt to co-opt the US military and intelligence. Notice who voted for America: Democrats! So let's not fall into the false equivalance that the 'Zion controls America' and that both parties are the same. No, they are not. Even during the recent Gaza war, 19 US Democratic Senators had voted to block the weapons supply to Israel. And during this war, 38 Democratic Senators voted to block weapons sale to Israel.
Of those Senators, while Bernie Sanders get much attention, I believe Senator Chris Van Hollen too should be recognized by the world: Not only on the Gaza and this war on Iran, he even stood up to India over Kashmir a few years ago.
Humanity indeed lives! Even in the US Congress.
@F22 Raptor @Hamartia Antidote targeting hospitals now; what do your cia handlers say about this?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.