Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I

How do u know Israel isn't also "taking a year to rebuild"?? Israel is also taking a year to rebuild many of its damaged facilities so why call Iran taking time rebuild a tactical success for Israel but Israel taking time(WHILE HIDING IT ALSO)to rebuild not a tactical success for Iran?
There is an overt and an indirect cover for the Zionists in this forum from day one. The Zios are constantly exaggerated, and the professional opinion of their tactical and strategic defeats is spammed by nonsense from suspect sources.

The following is directly from The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs' “Hasbara Handbook” (2002–2004, circulated widely online)
I am not making it up. It is directly from the handbook book and I quote
""Point out uncertainty."
“Where the other side claims facts, point out that the facts are disputed.”
“Your goal is not to win the argument but to create doubt in the audience.”
Here is one of many examples of pinpoint strikes from 1200 miles away. How long will it take Israel to rebuild?
There is an absolute blanket to hide all the damage inflicted on them. The logical inference is that a lot more damage was sustained than the general public is led to believe. We are now entering the seventh month since the so-called ceasefire.
 
Last edited:
How do u know Israel isn't also "taking a year to rebuild"?? Israel is also taking a year to rebuild many of its damaged facilities so why call Iran taking time rebuild a tactical success for Israel but Israel taking time(WHILE HIDING IT ALSO)to rebuild not a tactical success for Iran?
prior to the war Iran was enriching uranium and now 7 months later it is not (according to satellite imagery and clear public statements of the government)

prior to the war Israel had nuclear weapons and F-35s and it still has nuclear weapons and the exact same number of F-35s

we have extensive satellite imagery of damage to 20+ SSM bases, MoD bases, SPND facilities, air bases, missile production sites, vital nuclear facilities, etc. and we can monitor the slow rebuilding of these facilities.

if you have evidence of equivalent damage to similarly important Israeli military sites, feel free to share it, rather than engaging in the usual copium.

we saw from satellite imagery of Nevatim and Tel Nof from Operation True Promise II that 180-200 missiles only damaged 4-5 buildings, which do not appear critical. all evidence suggests that the level of damage inflicted by each side is not comparable at all.
 


video purports to show Israeli Hermes-900 MALE drone flying over Tehran visible to the naked eye

and an Iranian ambulance was later bombed, possibly by the same drone
 
There is an overt and an indirect cover for the Zionists in this forum from day one. The Zios are constantly exaggerated, and the professional opinion of their tactical and strategic defeats is spammed by nonsense from suspect sources.

The following is directly from The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs' “Hasbara Handbook” (2002–2004, circulated widely online)
I am not making it up. It is directly from the handbook book and I quote
""Point out uncertainty."


Here is one of many examples of pinpoint strikes from 1200 miles away. How long will it take Israel to rebuild?
There is an absolute blanket to hide all the damage inflicted on them. The logical inference is that a lot more damage was sustained than the general public is led to believe. We are now entering the seventh month since the so-called ceasefire.

Good examples of hasbara and the heavy censorship practiced by the Israelis. I do think that it isn't a matter of "zio cover" on this forum or elsewhere. Rather its the ubiquity of the Zionist narrative that has been pumped via movies, news, thinktanks, textbooks, politicians, TV shows, stereotypes, internet, christian zios. I think people simply under-estimate just how active the Zionists have been in PR and the political arena and how it has affected everyone.

Even Hamas was surprised by the success of the Oc 7th operation as it had subconsciously bought the Israeli narrative of absolute supremacy and factored it into its offensive. Hamas did not expect that it would be able to over-run the Israeli Southern division bases.
 
Iran will be attacked again for sure and jews goal this time will be to deprive iran capability to respond at all.
 
Last edited:
Good examples of hasbara and the heavy censorship practiced by the Israelis. I do think that it isn't a matter of "zio cover" on this forum or elsewhere. Rather its the ubiquity of the Zionist narrative that has been pumped via movies, news, thinktanks, textbooks, politicians, TV shows, stereotypes, internet, christian zios. I think people simply under-estimate just how active the Zionists have been in PR and the political arena and how it has affected everyone.

Even Hamas was surprised by the success of the Oc 7th operation as it had subconsciously bought the Israeli narrative of absolute supremacy and factored it into its offensive. Hamas did not expect that it would be able to over-run the Israeli Southern division bases.
There is a definite Zionist bias here. I posted numerous videos that validate your point, "ubiquity of the Zionist narrative," but they were quickly deleted.
Here is an example of their influence. I do not recall seeing the Speaker of the House meeting with Pope Leo XIV. He is supposed to be Christian, after all, but he is all full of glee meeting the rabbis.

I live here, and the people are tired of the Israeli firsters.
 
@ Fanboy 925, regarding your post about the damage sustained between Iran and Israel.
Let's use some critical thinking. Someone here loves to throw around "critical thinking."
Here is a quick test. Go on X and write a positive comment about the fake Israeli fanboys in India using AI to alter the photos of Slavic babes to make them look like Jews or Israelis. Write a positive comment about or talk shit about Iran and leadership. Your post will get thousands of views, dozens of hearts, and even be reposted a few times.
Then write a negative comment about Israel, and you will get 10-20 impressions at best.

Elon is a Zionist. He is one of the few elites who regularly trashes Muslims by highlighting a criminal act by a Pakistani or a muslim. In fact, when you look at the muslim community as a whole, they do not even register in criminal statistics. Almost all of the pedos are Jews and white. Most of the heinous crimes are committed by Afghans and the HTS/Al-Qaeda trained thugs. Even with that, it is insignificant when you look at percentages or horrific crimes. Stay with me, it will all make sense.

X is controlled by current and former Israeli intelligence. You can Google and see for yourself. All of a sudden, my timeline is flooded with various individuals claiming to show satellite photos of damage to Iranian military infrastructure. One supposedly indicates an entrance to Missile City that appears bombed. Did that stop the Israelis from getting hammered? Others show sheds, or supposedly mixing crates involved with missile production that were damaged. Here is a question: a country that has a massive military manufacturing industry, that has spent billions fortifying the stockpiles against the exact type of attacks that were attempted, would leave critical infrastructure unprotected? These same people exaggerate some abstract photos. Here is a critical thinking exercise: why haven't we seen satellite images of TP3 and damage to Israel? Why did they have clouds over the bases that were hit?

The only images and videos of the damage sustained by Israelis are from cell phones and mainstream media. They are significant. These same people were cheering during the war while Iranians were getting killed. "Iran is finished." "The regime is going to collapse within days," etc.

Here is the bottom line.
1- Israel asked for the ceasefire
2- The missile cities are intact
3- JCPOA is dead
4- Inspections are dead
5- Russia and China do not recognize the snap-back sanctions
6- The 400+ Kilo of enriched uranium was moved before the kabuki theater bombing of Fordow.
7- Iran has a free hand to enrich, and it does not need to disclose
8- A strategic failure for the US and Israel
9- A draw on the kinetic side of the conflict at best
10- Iran had a bomb design 20+ years ago

The same fanboys want you to believe that a country that has mastered the enrichment process, the same country that built advanced centrifuges, does not have enrichment capability or is not enriching uranium.

We do not need to listen to what they say; we need to pay attention to how they act. It has been seven months since the hostilities ended. If they had the upper hand, Iran would have been attacked several times already. The child-killing machine that killed 600,000 Palestinian women and children does not have mercy.
 
There is a definite Zionist bias here. I posted numerous videos that validate your point, "ubiquity of the Zionist narrative," but they were quickly deleted.
Here is an example of their influence. I do not recall seeing the Speaker of the House meeting with Pope Leo XIV. He is supposed to be Christian, after all, but he is all full of glee meeting the rabbis.

I live here, and the people are tired of the Israeli firsters.

this thread is about the Iran-Israel/US war, not about random examples of Jewish influence in the West and every other rambling ancillary topic. we know Jews have a lot of influence and Western media is biased to Western/Zionist viewpoints, you can make a new thread about that if you want.

further off topic posts will be deleted and warning points will be issued
 
prior to the war Iran was enriching uranium and now 7 months later it is not (according to satellite imagery and clear public statements of the government)

prior to the war Israel had nuclear weapons and F-35s and it still has nuclear weapons and the exact same number of F-35s

we have extensive satellite imagery of damage to 20+ SSM bases, MoD bases, SPND facilities, air bases, missile production sites, vital nuclear facilities, etc. and we can monitor the slow rebuilding of these facilities.

if you have evidence of equivalent damage to similarly important Israeli military sites, feel free to share it, rather than engaging in the usual copium.

we saw from satellite imagery of Nevatim and Tel Nof from Operation True Promise II that 180-200 missiles only damaged 4-5 buildings, which do not appear critical. all evidence suggests that the level of damage inflicted by each side is not comparable at all.
If Israel did not suffer significant damages; and if Iran suffered irreversible damage, along with the barrage of missiles slowing down significantly; you could have been damn sure Israel would have gone for the kill.

Israelis like to finish the job, especially when they see fear, weakness, and a total victory for themselves.

So just like the international media narrative on how they completely obliterated Hezbollah, and Hezbollah doesn’t have any of its prior capabilities intact, I would err on the side of caution on the Iran reporting as well.
 
IDF Orc representative: "Iran is producing ballistic missiles at extreme levels compared to before the war"


Well obviously , Iran is going to double down on a weapon that Israelis actually fear. But why would a "secret" report like this be released? Is it get more budget for something ? Or Israelis are now going to whine about this to the West ?
 
Well obviously , Iran is going to double down on a weapon that Israelis actually fear. But why would a "secret" report like this be released? Is it get more budget for something ? Or Israelis are now going to whine about this to the West ?
This is both factual and BS for them to bilk American taxpayers. Here is MTG on X today.

Another $500+ million for Israeli missile defense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top