Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[925boy]

Bashar wasn’t a good guy he used Iran for the purpose he needed pretended to do the axis of resistance bit but he wanted to stay in power instead of trying to do something great for Syria…….you have your opinion of him I have mine nothing wrong with that doesn’t mean I jumping on the J MAN bandwagon anytime soon

I asked you a question and you didn't ,sorry couldnt answer it, and instead its ow about your opinion vs my opinion?

Lmao.if you cant mention any better or more relevant person fit for the presidency than Bashar, then that answers the question as to why Bashar stayed on that seat for the time he did(at least until he was outsted by current the Jewqaeda leader). Issue resolved. Cheers

 

[Shags101]

I asked you a question and you didn't ,sorry couldnt answer it, and instead its ow about your opinion vs my opinion?

Lmao.if you cant mention any better or more relevant person fit for the presidency than Bashar, then that answers the question as to why Bashar stayed on that seat for the time he did(at least until he was outsted by current the Jewqaeda leader). Issue resolved. Cheers

Well I’m sorry to be fair can you name me any other Syrian leader during Bashars rein it’s like saying saddam was there or mbs or Abdullah or etc is it just acceptable because they are there.weren’t voted in or had votes rigged also forgot sisi so it’s like I said it’s your opinion who you thought was best to be lead Syria because he never attempted to give another option like all of these other guys.
We don’t always have to agree nothing wrong with that and honestly trying to sleep have to drop the wife at the airline 5 hours

 

[hasn2009]

View attachment 178255

Millions of Iranians come to the streets to show their support for their government and their nation against foreign rapist war criminals

 

[Immortals]

Hmm....where have I heard that before?

This guys not credible either. He made a lot of threats and predictions during True Promise 1&2 and the 12 day war that never panned out.

 

[Mehdipersian]

Damet Garm. You really burned the rear end of Pahlavists and their Zionist masters. I was worried that they would carry out terror attacks across Iran during the Marches, but I am very releaved that everyone was safe! Zendeh Bad Jomhurie Eslamie Iran!!!

ما را ز سر بریده می ترسانی؟

ما گر زسر بریده می ترسیدیم

در محفل عاشقان نمی رقصیدیم

Fear only the fear of God, fight until the last drop of blood like Imam Hussein.

 

[Shags101]

So can’t sleep all of sudden came down with a really bad cough but this pooped up

Turkey’s FM praises US-Iran nuclear talks, urges against discussing missile program

* * *

www.timesofisrael.com

So did they let it slip but are they now willing to let even Iran go back to enriching uranium again this can be all of we pulled wool of you guys again but maybe not

 

[mulj]

some on X are saying this is one of the many reasons why the US hasn't attacked Iran yet. I have to agree, there is nothing on record, but there seems to be a lot of support behind the curtain.





I bet this too is giving them pause

Gps jammer tech also is significant defensive measure, it kills lot of precision in attacks but never the less i think the war is unavoidable.
IN my opinion you are in better position then pre 12 war days and improving.
And most important nation unity, i doubt even full force of western world can take down nation size of Iran if it is ready to fight and defend.

 

[hasn2009]

IN my opinion you are in better position then pre 12 war days and improving.

May be, or may be not. But what is certain is this time U.S will be on the offense, and not only Israel, tons of difference in firepower, that makes a huge difference.

 

[StrategicBear]

May be, or may be not. But what is certain is this time U.S will be on the offense, and not only Israel, tons of difference in firepower, that makes a huge difference.

But Iran's SRBMs are more accurate and numerous than MRBMs used to attack Israel, so it'd be easier for Iran to retaliate against US bases and Gulf targets than Israel which is farther away.

 

[hasn2009]

But Iran's SRBMs are more accurate and numerous than MRBMs used to attack Israel, so it'd be easier for Iran to retaliate against US bases and Gulf targets than Israel which is farther away.

Probably, but if you remember the 12day war, in the start Israel did have the upper hand, they really decapitated Iran's mil leadership and crippled the defenses, took Iran some time to recover and respond. But incase of U.S, the attack will exponentially intense, and if all goes well for the U.S, they will not give Iran any breathing space to recover and re-group.

 

[Shags101]

IDF reservist and civilian indicted for using classified info to place bets on Polymarket

* * *

www.timesofisrael.com

@Immortals so I thought this was funny I think you owe somebody an apology I guess it wasn’t a conspiracy theory I forgot who the guy the guy who reposted it but even I thought it as a conspiracy theory

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

so no more posts on Ba'al?

 

[Homajon]

. .

 

[Pak-Warrior]

Iran has ballistic and cruise missiles and anti-ship suicide drones with ranges of over 1,000 kilometers.

Yes Iran definitely have. But only BMs or supersonic CMs can penetrate defenses as ordinary subsonic CMs or slow drones won't pose a threat to CSG. So which are the super precise BMs or supersonic CMs that Iran have above 1000 km range that provide mid-course correction based on real time targeting information? As Carrier group is not a fixed target like Telaviv or a massive airbase. Its constantly moving at 60 km/hr. Precise strike at a moving target 1000 kms away is really daunting task. Not to mention the target is heavily defended and has SAMs of all kinds + close in weapon systems concentrated to protect carrier.

I think land based missiles alone may not give desireable results. Iran would have to employ deception, element of surprise, disruption techniques and swarming + land based missiles all together to have a real shot.

 

[Pak-Warrior]

Will this make it a total of 2, or 3 aircraft carriers? One near the Persian Gulf, one Mediterranean Sea and now "this new one?"

Even 2 or 3 carriers cannot do the regime change. All they can do is bomb and leave without achieving objectives. Trump may declare victory but that won't be a win in real sense.