Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he's a random Iranian living in Turkey, you want to execute him for sharing an incorrect opinion on twitter?He should be the first person executed if Iran is attacked. The 2nd being the clown of a FM we have.
Executions will continue until credibility improves.
well in fairness, the USA didn't launch that war
No, If 10,000 kg of uranium is enriched to 60% (or less), it cannot make ANY ATOMIC BOMB. To make one, you would have to take this uranium and re-enrich it until it all reaches 90%, then you could make about 250 Hiroshima-style bombs.“10,000 kg” of enriched uranium?
please stop using stupid sources. 10,000kg is enough to make 300+ nuclear bombs.
I prefer Iranic-Muslim at leastNow we're talking, we need a Muslim Nato, a Muslim economic free trade zone...etc.
they said enriched, not to which level“10,000 kg” of enriched uranium?
please stop using stupid sources. 10,000kg is enough to make 300+ nuclear bombs.
“10,000 kg” of enriched uranium?
please stop using stupid sources. 10,000kg is enough to make 300+ nuclear bombs.

As of May 17, 2025, Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile is approximately 9,247.6 kg, including over 400 kg enriched to 60% purity, which is near weapons-gradeHe did not state 10,000kg of weapons grade HEU; I understood it total stockpile of enriched uranium at all enrichment levels combined that Trump administration wants to be taken out of Iran.
Source: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/iran#:~:text=The IAEA estimated that as,since the previous quarterly report).
View attachment 181103
So, looking at that report, Iran currently has, at minimum, 8,413.3 KGs of total enriched Uranium.![]()
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists +3Ok, but US doesn't have the economic luxuries today to afford expensive wars,especially a non- short one.Modern wars "don’t last very long" (5-15 days) is historically inaccurate regarding major power conflicts. While the initial "shock and awe" phase is short, the occupations, proxy wars, and asymmetric warfare that follow last for decades (e.g., Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine). The U.S. has already proven it can maintain massive defense budgets and deficits for prolonged periods. Arab money will alleviate the pain and the argument that the "American economy can’t really afford it" ignores the reality that the U.S. defense budget is treated as a political priority, not a fiscal constraint, by Washington.
Pakistan and Iran havent improved their relationship and signed a defense pact because Pakistani govt sold Pakistan's sovereignty to an unspoken "joint partnership" between China and US. China controls Pakistan economically while US remote controls Pakistan politically and militarily. This is why Iran has to monitor Pakistan closely, because Iran doesn't know which side/border its enemies will approach it from in the pending war and the Pakistani govt has sold out Pakistan and its core values, for some money, to save the state from insolvency, that can still happen. Iran could really do with a reliable Pakkstan today but I dont think Pakistan is fully dependable for or committed to Iran no matter the govt leader comments.Why Pakistan and Iran haven't improved their economic partnership and signed a defense pact is beyond astonishing, in a rapidly changing world both need to put aside their differences and work in unity. Both Iran and Pakistan need each other more than before and both have common enemies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.