Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lmao , thought about whether it was sarcasm or no and thought dbc is serious no way he/she joke in a thread like this , sorry my fault .ok please open up a dictionary and look up the meaning of the word sarcasm.
Purely based on the inability of Iranian forces to actually hit airborne targets, especially at higher altitudes where tankers operate, my personal speculation is that an accident is more likely than an anti aircraft strike.With all this technology nowadays & they still have friendly fire incidents? .. Mhmmm
American Js will "agree" with your "reasonable points ",but on the inside they dont actually accept your point or care about its validity, so i noticed they are often machiavelian in their mindset and behavior- let's forget stereotypes, they exist for good reasons, whether we like them or not.I have a Jewish American friend in my circle and of course, he has a love for Israel. Once in our conversations, I asked him 'I accept the Europeans/Germans did their horrible thing to the Jews around WW II. But why is that a fault of the Palestinians to pay the price?'. He timidly said, 'Yes, I agree'.
Ik it's parody that's why I posted itIt’s fake friend . Delete your post
It's a parody account.
They're just impersonating centcom
Clashes between a ship affiliated with the Iranian Navy and an American ship off the Arabian Sea
Waiting for confirmation from other sources, not sure what it could be given Iranian Navy was destroyed in the early days of the war.
ExceptTo mods : This forum should allow more for Free Speech if it's for talking about enemy soldiers invading Muslim lands. I have been to Western Conspiracy Forums, and the free speech there is to the extreme that many have been seen openly wishing for and cheering for the deaths and destruction of Muslims, so we shouldn't be too weak about this issue when the people on the other side hate us to their guts.
I will suggest you base your conclusion on facts. Something which seems to be lacking throughout a good part of this thread.I will based it base on whatever information there is, which is dynamic
Iran is not operating as a nation, it's operation as guerillas. And in assymetric guerilla warfare how often have u seen them using an air force or demanding that they need them?A nation always requires a strong air force. While I agree that the odds were against Iran. Largely because the Americans and Israelis have aligned. An air force remains an absolute necessity for establishing aerial presence. When coupled with a robust arsenal of missiles and other strategic assets, you have the complete package.
WTF are you talking about? What makes you think the crew wasn't wearing parachutes?
most people believe this whole war should be in the epstein thread.How is this relevant to the thread?
This should be in the Epstein thread.
You needed some kind of defensive aerial system at least that wasn't so vulnerable like the ground based ones to at least prevent or blunt sustained aerial bombing.Iran is not operating as a nation, it's operation as guerillas. And in assymetric guerilla warfare how often have u seen them using an air force or demanding that they need them?
You can only develop air force if you can protect them. Otherwise the overwhelming superior enemy will just wreck them and u wasted all that money.