Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

With all this technology nowadays & they still have friendly fire incidents? .. Mhmmm
Purely based on the inability of Iranian forces to actually hit airborne targets, especially at higher altitudes where tankers operate, my personal speculation is that an accident is more likely than an anti aircraft strike.

I don't think friendly fire is likely.
 
I have a Jewish American friend in my circle and of course, he has a love for Israel. Once in our conversations, I asked him 'I accept the Europeans/Germans did their horrible thing to the Jews around WW II. But why is that a fault of the Palestinians to pay the price?'. He timidly said, 'Yes, I agree'.
American Js will "agree" with your "reasonable points ",but on the inside they dont actually accept your point or care about its validity, so i noticed they are often machiavelian in their mindset and behavior- let's forget stereotypes, they exist for good reasons, whether we like them or not.
 
Clashes between a ship affiliated with the Iranian Navy and an American ship off the Arabian Sea


Waiting for confirmation from other sources, not sure what it could be given Iranian Navy was destroyed in the early days of the war.

Does Iran have supersonic cruise missiles and stealth subsonic ones?

Maybe small speedboats firing those?
 
To mods : This forum should allow more for Free Speech if it's for talking about enemy soldiers invading Muslim lands. I have been to Western Conspiracy Forums, and the free speech there is to the extreme that many have been seen openly wishing for and cheering for the deaths and destruction of Muslims, so we shouldn't be too weak about this issue when the people on the other side hate us to their guts.
Except

I do not think anyone rational here would want to be associated with hate, racist, and deranged individuals openly/freely calling for death.

We all should have an opinion but dirtying up the board with nonsense is not something I would like to be a part of.

Do you really also want the bad publicity that would also come from it? Sure fire way to destroy this forum.
 
I will suggest you base your conclusion on facts. Something which seems to be lacking throughout a good part of this thread.I will based it base on whatever information there is, which is dynamic

I agree. However, conclusions can change depending on the availability of reliable information. It's dynamic in the end. Just like claims of Iran losing the war, from the POTUS himself.
 
A nation always requires a strong air force. While I agree that the odds were against Iran. Largely because the Americans and Israelis have aligned. An air force remains an absolute necessity for establishing aerial presence. When coupled with a robust arsenal of missiles and other strategic assets, you have the complete package.
Iran is not operating as a nation, it's operation as guerillas. And in assymetric guerilla warfare how often have u seen them using an air force or demanding that they need them?

You can only develop air force if you can protect them. Otherwise the overwhelming superior enemy will just wreck them and u wasted all that money.

Best for Iran would be enough planes that it could safely hide underground. Even that could arguably not work if the runways and entrances are constantly bombed.
 
Iran is not operating as a nation, it's operation as guerillas. And in assymetric guerilla warfare how often have u seen them using an air force or demanding that they need them?

You can only develop air force if you can protect them. Otherwise the overwhelming superior enemy will just wreck them and u wasted all that money.
You needed some kind of defensive aerial system at least that wasn't so vulnerable like the ground based ones to at least prevent or blunt sustained aerial bombing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top