Fatman17
Moderator
Just 2How many chinook are we talking in total??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just 2How many chinook are we talking in total??
But their airforce was an old barely servicable force and was never central to their air defence plans. These sams are part of irgc air and space defence force command. So yes iranian airforce did shoot these aircraft downIran had an air force.
@immortalNo outages reported yetFusion Cloud Applications Status
The Oracle Cloud Applications Status page provides transparency around the availability of SaaS applications.saasstatus.oracle.com
Not our problem.But their airforce was an old barely servicable force and was never central to their air defence plans.
Sure.These sams are part of irgc air and space defence force command. So yes iranian airforce did shoot these aircraft down
Imagine the hubris of a "country" of 1,5 million (not counting expatriates) comprised of fat lazy lizardeaters to dictate terms to a proud nation of 250 million people in Pakistan.
Corrected for you.Because there were none.
You sound very bitter. Iran barely had what anyone would call an 'airforce', but yet that didn't stop them from humbling you - a month after they were 'obliterated' according to the orange clown you elected as your leader. Now icing on the cake would be to find that Pilot holed somewhere in a gutter in Iran and parade him on live TV. Stay tunedNot our problem.
Sure.
What's an appropriate term to use when a force can, at will:Am going to get this straight...
Air Dominance: The ability of an air force to compel other air forces to re-array themselves, usually into subordinate postures.
Air Superiority: The ability of an air force to achieve control of contested airspace(s), repeatedly if necessary, and if there are losses, those losses would not pose a statistical deterrence to that ability.
Air Supremacy: He flies, he dies.
What arrogance.Because there are none.
Am going to get this straight...
Air Dominance: The ability of an air force to compel other air forces to re-array themselves, usually into subordinate postures.
Air Superiority: The ability of an air force to achieve control of contested airspace(s), repeatedly if necessary, and if there are losses, those losses would not pose a statistical deterrence to that ability.
Air Supremacy: He flies, he dies.
The clear indicator here is air force vs air force.
There are two ways you can lose an air attacker, be it a fighter or a bomber: against the opposing air force, or against ground based defense.
We can eliminate the Iranian air force as cause of our air losses. The best way to defeat enemy air force is to destroy them while they are on the ground.
Ground based air defense is the last line of defense. Ground based air defense is when the enemy is literally over you. Ground based air defense is REACTIVE while an air force is PROACTIVE/PREEMPTIVE. Ground based air defense CANNOT carry the fight to the enemy but an air force can. Do you understand?
Like it or not, the US owns Iranian airspace. Any Iranian airplane flies, he dies. Simple as that.
We do.
And US had bases in Saudí Arabia, Kuwait, Irak and so on...Iran had an air force.
The problem here is that war is not a football match.Then by this definition, "air supremacy" becomes a pointless index of analysis, outside of massaging Pete Hegseth's ego.
Significant harm can be dealt to this air force, even if it is enjoying a state of so called "air supremacy".
I won't lose the football match over 90 minutes but I'll still lose on penalties.