sharreman10
Registered Member
Why would Iran agree to a ceasefire?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rumors of peace accords for ceasefire being finalized but with Iranian toll/control over Hormuz.
Its a trap.
Monopolizing photovoltaics, EV, Why does China, with its drone and other power industries, want to block a war that destroys the oil industry?
Even in terms of oil security, the domestic diesel prices in China have only risen by 0.13 CNY (2 cents) so far, without feeling any threat or pain. How can China have the motivation to stop this war?
China's coal reserves rank first in the world, four times that of the second place, and the coal refining industry is likely to be reactivated. Wait. What reasons can make China stop the war for the benefit of the United States?
View attachment 190679
I’ve got two words for you. Market Manipulation.
It's a trap! it's a trap!
There is no way in God's heaven that Iran with the Islamic Republic would survive any scenario that does not involve going nuclear.Iran does not want an endless war. But from Tehran’s perspective, if the choice is between a temporary ceasefire after which the war is likely to resume, and continued fighting under current conditions, it is more likely to keep fighting, not to “open the straits” on someone else’s terms.
Any proposal put before Iran would have to include not only a halt to the current operation, but also a credible commitment that it will not be resumed - in effect, an end to the campaign. It would also have to narrow future talks to two issues only: Hormuz and the nuclear file, explicitly excluding missiles and support for regional allies. And those talks would have to take place on the assumption that Iran retains both its leverage over Hormuz and its nuclear capabilities.
From the Iranian point of view, this is the only realistic path to stopping the war.
Further escalation, including strikes on Iranian infrastructure, is unlikely to change these core calculations. If Washington is unwilling to move toward these terms, then it will eventually have to expand the war without illusions about the cost—particularly the enormous consequences for the global economy.
Pakistan is doing the honourable thing to try and push for a solution but in reality, there is little ANY nation can offer the belligerents because nobody can be a guantor in these circumstances. Iran is right to reject any ceasefire in this context because USA and Israel will simply not adhere to the concept of a ceasefire.
I guess in long term, the war does affect China's energy supplies imports, just how big. The question is can China readily replace the shortages with other sources such as green energies in time ? But, I think China can get by with coal use as the backup in worst case.
I guess in long term, the war does affect China's energy supplies imports, just how big. The question is can China readily replace the shortages with other sources such as green energies in time ? But, I think China can get by with coal use as the backup in worst case.
Just a normal warehouse fire. It’s quite a routine in sharjah industrial area.
The US should shut down all its bases in the GCC states and does not have stationed military forces in a 2,000 km radius of Iran. Any violation of this should be legally seen as a preparation for war and guarantees Iran the right to a pre-emptive strike.I have two questions.
May I ask which Iranian politician currently has the ability to persuade all Iranian armed groups to cease fire?
What kind of guarantee does Iran need to obtain in order to believe that it is a permanent ceasefire?