Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Abdul q]

China uses its veto against the decision to open the Strait of Hormuz

@AlArabiya_Brk

Chatter on X multiple handles of Saudi/Pak defense pact… this thing scares me…..

 

[PakSword]

 

[Immortals]

 

[Musings]

Even their own arent safe from these cockroaches

 

[Magi]

Both China and Russia vetoed Bahrain's UNSC proposal. Finally some actual support from Russia and China.

Iran should make Bahrain inhabitable. They deserve to be obliterated more than any other country around us.

Did Bahrain bridge get hit yet? It feels like Iran won't touch it until the last second if at all. Feels as likely as building a nuke.

 

[Musings]

I pray for our Iranian brothers and sisters and hope there is no more bloodshed tonight

 

[Immortals]

 

[Flotilla]

This is the real target of Irán. Take out this crazy stupid and deal with someone capable of stopping Netanyahu.

 

[ShapurII]

You have identified the biggest risk, with the USA proposal, it will allow for the troop carrier to potentially to get to Kuwait, Bahrain, Iraq or even UAE to be staged for attack.

Right, it's obviously a trap for Iran. I mean we are talking about a country governed by an administration owned by the Zionists to the core, who has attacked Iran twice in the middle of negotiations in the last 9 months! I really cannot understand the people who say "But you can't predict the future", "Your opinion can be wrong" lmao

 

[The SC]

Chatter on X multiple handles of Saudi/Pak defense pact… this thing scares me…..

China thinks about its interests, and its support for Iran is not for its eyes, but to confront America and reduce its influence. It is a real global game. But using the veto will harm the world's and in particular Gulf's relations with China. This is not in China's interest..

 

[Immortals]

Did Bahrain bridge get hit yet? It feels like Iran won't touch it until the last second if at all. Feels as likely as building a nuke.

Such an attack would use Iranian HIMARS or long range rocket salvos against it because it’s too narrow of a target to use a ballistic missile and would likely miss.

Either that way that bridge isn’t easily being destroyed without massive ordnance.

 

[mythbuster]

Where did you get that logic from that Zionist entity has destroyed Iran's capability to threaten them for 10-20 years at least.

Iran could still have thousands of MRBMs that could hit the entity and they can quickly re-establish any damaged or destroyed facility to build more. In fact right now Iran is producing liquid fuelled MRBMs under deep mountain factories.

How come you know all these secrets ? Do you have moles in Iran ?

 

[SilentWatch]

You are engaging me in a conversation that is already over in my opinion.

I will repeat it for the last time, hoping that people will no longer reply to me on this.

This is what will happen after 45 days:
1. The US will replenish the AD in the region that is already on the verge of running out completely.
2. The US forces will be stationed and prepared to launch a ground invasion of Iran. The US amphibious ships will pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
3. The US will bring in more standoff weapons to reduce potential casualties.
4. An oil shock and energy crisis will be avoided, neutralizing Iran's winning card.

On the other hand:
1. Iran will be able to produce 200, 300 or at the most optimistic scenario 400 MRBMs again, all of them or more will be used to exhaust the AD in the region again. So, no gain here, all loss.
2. Iran will lose its islands and oil exports in the Persian Gulf because the US will have amphibious ships and enough troops to invade them. No gain, all loss.
3. Iran will not be able to resolve its main vulnerabilities, i.e. an air force for troop movements and close air support. The 45-day ceasefire changes nothing for the IRIAF or the IRIAA. No gain here either.
4. Iran cannot produce a nuclear bomb in 45 days either. Again, no gain here.

Conclusion: No gains for Iran, all gains for the United States.

And this is the end of this discussion for me. Anybody who recommends Iran to accept a temporary ceasefire is betraying Iran in my opinion. Period.

Iran would keep its bridges, universities, power plants water pipelines all heavy industries, runways and ports

Iran gains not loosing infrastructure… most Arab industries are expat run - variable cost… arabs are less in pop density

Iran’s choice - this is not overwhelmingly victory for any if resistance and survival is the only strategy

Excited to see how the next 48 hours pans out and the chips fall…

 

[ShapurII]

Did Bahrain bridge get hit yet? It feels like Iran won't touch it until the last second if at all. Feels as likely as building a nuke.

Not yet, unfortunately.
Bahrain belonged to us, the stupid Shah let it go because a bunch of stupid locals voted for independence in the most peaceful way. If it is not going to return to us, it should be obliterated and be made inhabitable for the sole reason of acting so aggressively against Iran.

We gave them their independence in the most peaceful way without firing a single bullet and this is how they pay us back after just half a century!

 

[ShapurII]

Iran would keep its bridges, universities, power plants water pipelines all heavy industries, runways and ports

Iran gains not loosing infrastructure… most Arab industries are expat run - variable cost… arabs are less in pop density

Iran’s choice - this is not overwhelmingly victory for any if resistance and survival is the only strategy

Excited to see how the next 48 hours pans out and the chips fall…

No, it won't. They will come after us again after 45 days and hit everything they haven't hit yet. Didn't you read what I wrote?

Thanks, we don't need you to worry for us. As I said, end of the discussion for me. I am not going to reply to you on this matter any more.