Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[ustaad]

So first he was trying to open the strait which was already open before the war and now he wants to close the strait which is already closed?

What will be his next threat? let me guess..

"I will saltify entire ocean if Iran does not open the strait"

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RealNapster]

I am pretty sure Iran felt a HUGE difference to have a strong Airforce when we (PAF) carried their Iranian delegations (huge 80+ members) from there to Islamabad safety and then bring back to their home safety.

PROTECTION SHIELD

Wo Iranian he kia Jo Airforce or atom bomb ki ehmeyat Samaj jay.

 

[Kyussis]

Goal of regime is "Death to Israel/America". It has been stated clearly for decades. There is no other use.

If that was the goal we would have had Nuclear weapons 30 years ago!

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Immortals]

If true, big L for Iran.

@Persian Gulf @Immortals

That guy posts non stop propaganda in this thread. Please report him as I have.

@Musings this mod is out of control posting garbage content

 

[Flotilla]

So if they don't pay, Iran will not allow them. But if they pay then USA will seize their ships. So trump is hellbound to take barrel to $200.

While also USA announced that it will block international passage to strait of hurmuz because it doesn't allow Iran blocking an international passage. Wah.

You´re right.

Fees or 200 USD barrel.

CHOOSE YOUR DEATH!!!

 

[Immortals]

Meanwhile in Kashmir….

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[maverick]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iranian Lego numbers are awesome !

 

[ShapurII]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Giving the US a share in the Strait of Hormuz is not a bad idea actually. It cements our status as the police of the strait. Legally speaking, Iran does not own the Strait of Hormuz. So, we are still gaining something valuable of significant strategic importance here. This can also shape our future relationship with the US in a positive way.

I think a 3-year halt on uranium enrichment is not bad either, if they accept it, instead of 20 years. We certainly need time to rebuild our nuclear infrastructure. Maybe not 3 years, but definitely more than a year. As long as it involves only nuclear enrichment and not other nuclear activities, it's not bad for Iran in the long run.

The issue of Iran's HEU stockpile boils down to Iran's true intentions. If we are trying to build the bomb (the intelligent choice), we should do something about it fast. We should enrich it further in any way possible, even if it's risky.

If we do not intend to build the bomb (super stupid, in my opinion), we can put it under IAEA supervision inside Iran and even allow a small number of Americans to supervise it. Trump can pitch this as a win for the US.

 

[Optical216]

Giving the US a share in the Strait of Hormuz is not a bad idea actually. It cements our status as the police of the strait. Legally speaking, Iran does not own the Strait of Hormuz. So, we are still gaining something valuable here.

I think a 3-year halt on uranium enrichment is not bad either, if they accept it. We certainly need time to rebuild our nuclear infrastructure. Maybe not 3 years, but definitely more than a year. As long as it involves only nuclear enrichment and not other nuclear activities, it's not bad for Iran in the long run.

The issue of Iran's HEU stockpile boils down to Iran's true intentions. If we are trying to build the bomb (the intelligent choice), we should do something about it fast. We should enrich it further in any way possible.

If we do not intend to build the bomb (super stupid, in my opinion), we can put it under IAEA supervision inside Iran and even allow a small number of Americans to supervise it. Trump can pitch this as a win for the US.

i knew that mf trump was a leech i called it that he liked the idea of a toll fee and wanted it all for himself

 

[lightning f57]

Did China try to break the U.S. naval blockades on Venezuela or Cuba for you to raise such a scenario?

In any case, I guess we’ll find out:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Trumpy further moronic move.

So make the economic situation worse is trumpy move.

Hel soon have his Asian and European allies pressuring him to stop.

 

[Lulldapull]

It is about time for Pakistan to anounce haste start of construction for oil and gas pipeline from Iran to Gwadar.

We already got a border! Wes safe……just playing around