Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Muji.Iqbal
Trusted Member
Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera
News, analysis from the Middle East & worldwide, multimedia & interactives, opinions, documentaries, podcasts, long reads and broadcast schedule.
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
东风夜放花千树
Registered Member
On April 23, Reza Pahlavi, the Iranian opposition figure and son of Iran's last shah, who currently resides in the United States, said in response to a reporter's question about whether he is an Israeli agent that he is a friend of Israel and the Jewish people.
Pahlavi stated that he is "certainly not an Israeli agent" and explained the meaning of his "friendship" with this Jewish state. In his view, he is a descendant of Cyrus the Great, and he takes pride in the fact that it was the Persians who laid the foundation for human rights (the Cyrus Cylinder), a concept now associated with the United Nations.
Earlier, in an interview with the American Fox News Channel, Pahlavi said that he is ready to return to Iran and take charge of the country during a transitional period.
On April 23, after ending a press conference in Berlin, Iran's exiled crown prince Pahlavi was doused with an unknown red liquid by protesters outside the building. Footage from the scene showed that Pahlavi appeared unaffected by the incident and even waved to the crowd holding Iranian flags before getting into his car.
On the same day, Pahlavi stated when asked by reporters about being an Israeli agent that he is a friend of Israel and the Jewish people. Previously, Pahlavi had strongly called on the United States to "stick to its course" and not to halt attacks on Iran, declaring that "President Trump is making America great again, and I plan to make Iran great again."
Here is my viewpoint: Iran's exiled crown prince Pahlavi is a pawn of the United States, used in the propaganda war against Iran. My standard of judgment is this: anyone who opposes the aggressive actions of the United States and Israel's anti-humanitarian actions should be supported, and anyone who supports the aggressive actions of the United States and Israel's anti-humanitarian actions is considered an ally of the evil US-Israel axis.
Pahlavi stated that he is "certainly not an Israeli agent" and explained the meaning of his "friendship" with this Jewish state. In his view, he is a descendant of Cyrus the Great, and he takes pride in the fact that it was the Persians who laid the foundation for human rights (the Cyrus Cylinder), a concept now associated with the United Nations.
Earlier, in an interview with the American Fox News Channel, Pahlavi said that he is ready to return to Iran and take charge of the country during a transitional period.
On April 23, after ending a press conference in Berlin, Iran's exiled crown prince Pahlavi was doused with an unknown red liquid by protesters outside the building. Footage from the scene showed that Pahlavi appeared unaffected by the incident and even waved to the crowd holding Iranian flags before getting into his car.
On the same day, Pahlavi stated when asked by reporters about being an Israeli agent that he is a friend of Israel and the Jewish people. Previously, Pahlavi had strongly called on the United States to "stick to its course" and not to halt attacks on Iran, declaring that "President Trump is making America great again, and I plan to make Iran great again."
Here is my viewpoint: Iran's exiled crown prince Pahlavi is a pawn of the United States, used in the propaganda war against Iran. My standard of judgment is this: anyone who opposes the aggressive actions of the United States and Israel's anti-humanitarian actions should be supported, and anyone who supports the aggressive actions of the United States and Israel's anti-humanitarian actions is considered an ally of the evil US-Israel axis.
ShapurII
Trusted Member
US and Israel used fewer than 250 jets against Iran. GCC states can multiply that by a factor of 3. Using your logic, Iraq was also a belligerent state in the war because no country was used to lob missiles at us more than the "brotherly" Iraq.
They actually do. The dynamics of politics in Europe is different from the US. Just look at Hungary and how a pro-Russia, Trump loving president like Orban was kicked out of the office in the blink of an eye. Not every country follows a bi-partisan system like the US where your vote is determined by your loyalty to your party.
Bahrain's resolution depicted Iran as a threat to international security falling under Chapter VII of the UN charter. Article 42 of the UN charter says that once a country has been recognized as a threat to world peace, a coalition of UN members can be formed to resolve the threat. And no UN member is allowed to intervene in this process.
Waste a trillion dollars? The US war on Iran cost both the US and Israel less than $60 billion after 40 days.
We can agree to disagree on that, but I don't think there is any other rational explanation that can explain why Iran accepted the ceasefire right after Russia and China vetoed Bahrain's UNSC resolution, particularly when the voting on that resolution had been delayed twice. The only other explanation is that Iran is ruled by Mossad and American agents.
MH.Yang
Trusted Member
There is no reason to explain why Iran decided to cease fire after you having lunch. Perhaps you are the king of the world, your lunch putting pressure on the Iranian government?
If China had the ability to control the diplomacy of the Iranian government, President Laissey would not have died, and Iranians would have been dancing hand in hand with Arabs a long time ago.
Also, I have already explained earlier that this war has both advantages and disadvantages for China, and even the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. China has no incentive to forcibly end this war.
It is Russia, not China, that truly has the ability to influence your diplomacy.
Moreover, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which truly holds power, has no intention of a ceasefire. The reason why it asked the Iranian government to negotiate is simply because it does not want to take responsibility for disrupting the peace talks. The United States and Israel also have no intention of a ceasefire, and they do not want to take responsibility for disrupting peace talks and the world economy.
The Chinese government also knows that Iran and the United States are both performance, and the reason why they are accompanying you in performance is simply that China does not want to be accused by other countries of not being responsible for the world economy, and even being accused of being the mastermind behind this war.
This war will start over sooner or later. The only goal of the Chinese government is to prevent Iran from being controlled by the United States and Israel. As for how long you want to fight, it's your own problem.
Last edited:
ShapurII
Trusted Member
Spare me your nonsense please. I didn't even bother to read the rest of your post.
Trump said China helped him convince Iran to accept the ceasefire. That's more than enough in my opinion.
China's 26 phone calls that brought on a US-Iran ceasefire
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi says he held 26 phone calls with his counterparts in Iran, Israel, Russia and Gulf countries before the ceasefire was reached.
www.abc.net.au
MH.Yang
Trusted Member
You might be the person in the world who believes in Trump the most.Spare me your nonsense please. I didn't even bother to read the rest of your post.
Trump said China helped him convince Iran to accept the ceasefire. That's more than enough in my opinion.
China's 26 phone calls that brought on a US-Iran ceasefire
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi says he held 26 phone calls with his counterparts in Iran, Israel, Russia and Gulf countries before the ceasefire was reached.
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
Breaking: First F-47 Sixth-Gen Fighter Already Being Built, Expected to Fly in 2028 (4 Viewers)- Latest: Oscar
-
-
Latest Posts
-
-
Corruption and economic scandals thread of the caretaker and PDM governments. (4 Viewers)- Latest: Goenitz
-
-
-