Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The American people hated the Vietnam war because of the draft. They will hate the war against Iran once oil hits $12 and the workers start burning down warehouses.At least in case of the Vietnam War, there was the staged Gulf of Tonkien. And in many other wars--wars on communism and wars on terror--there were attempts to rally the American support and even try to get some support in the UN.
But this war on Iran is launched without hardly making a 'case' for it. No 'manufacturing consent' this time. And that shows how dangerous and arrogant Donald Trump is. He is acting like Netanyahu acts in Gaza, in the West Bank, and in Lebanon, and now also Netanyahu acts like that in Syria.
I am worried about you white imperialistic bastards and what you have been doing in this region for decades.uh-huh..and you aren't worried about Iran's nuclear program...with those semi-independent entities" lurking about...able to fire missiles at Pakistan.
NGL - you sound ret*rded. Are you indian?You forgot to read the post i responded to.
Let me put it straight for you:
Taliban were harboured in Pakistan giving them much needed breathing space to survive.
Now since Iran is under naval blockade, opening land trade routes gives them breathing space and that's a ridiculous thing to do.
It's like my neighbor fired bullets on me, although I responded in kind, but if he gets in deadlock somewhere else - i would be stupid to support him out.
I am worried about you white imperialistic bastards and what you have been doing in this region for decades.
that's one view of imperialism, slavery, theft of native resources.Usually making the world go ‘round instead of standing still for centuries.
Pakistan asserted itself? By doing what exactly? Closing the land border for a mere month or so? Pakistan didn't even close its airspace to NATO, never mind responding militarily. Pakistan had nukes then but yet that didn't stop the yanks from humiliating Pakistan publicly and that wasn't a one off incident, OBL raid, drone strikes etc to name other few. Another point most Pakistanis forget is that whilst we do have nukes, we currently have NO reliable system to deliver these outside our own region.Salalah attack was a pressure check tactic and a humiliation ritual, which is at the core of the ideology plaguing this planet currently, to see if Pakistan would play dead or assert, Pakistan asserted itself and did not play dead. Otherwise the theater of operations would have expanded far deeper into Pakistan.
You can have the most advanced types of weapons but if your soldiers do not have food to eat after three days, life becomes something else.
Saddam didn't have hundreds and hundreds or possibly 1000 nukes with reliable delivery mechanisms with various city ending capacities as well as stockpiles of chemical and biologal weapons to end life. If things come to that, the population of this planet would be reduced by at least 1.25 Billion on the eastern side of Pakistan and by about 40 to 100 million looking westward. Europe's atmosphere would also change permanently and many capitals of the world will disappear from reality. So that outcome is not desired by many, despite their mythological beliefs in some messiah who can be forced to reveal himself, they will not risk such a suicidal mission.
North Korea has just a few, 12 to 35, nukes, and everyone had decided to leave them alone. NK will eventually become a Vietnam because they have no political instability.
Usually making the world go ‘round instead of standing still for centuries.
Cutting off the supply lines to a Super Power on a religious mission backed up by the next 30 countries is no small task.Pakistan asserted itself? By doing what exactly? Closing the land border for a mere month or so. Pakistan didn't even close its airspace to NATO, never mind responding militarily. Pakistan had nukes then but yet that didn't stop the yanks from humiliating Pakistan publicly and that wasn't a one off incident, OBL raid, drone strikes etc to name other few. Another point most Pakistanis forget is that whilst we do have nukes, we currently have NO reliable system to deliver these outside our own region.
Pakistan's military 'might' is nothing against US, Nato etc. I'd say no country can currently take on US with or without nukes, not even China.
Oh Dear! There is no depth to which these irrelevant bottlers wont sunk...pathetic.
Pakistan asserted itself? By doing what exactly? Closing the land border for a mere month or so? Pakistan didn't even close its airspace to NATO, never mind responding militarily. Pakistan had nukes then but yet that didn't stop the yanks from humiliating Pakistan publicly and that wasn't a one off incident, OBL raid, drone strikes etc to name other few. Another point most Pakistanis forget is that whilst we do have nukes, we currently have NO reliable system to deliver these outside our own region.
Pakistan's military 'might' is nothing against US, Nato etc. I'd say no country can currently take on US with or without nukes, not even China.
Brother you are deeply mistaken.A little offtopic but... when the Pakistanis stopped the NATO supplies over the Salalah incident for months, the Americans, with the Russian consent, started the alternate long and expensive resupply route through the Russian sphere of influence. And after the Americans left Afghanistan in August 2021, six months later the Russia-Ukraine war started, which has caused huge casualties to the Russians, no small thanks to the Americans.
Russians are such strategic thinkers. NOT! People talks about the supine Arab regimes. At least some excuses could be made for the Arab countries. But look at the ultimate cuck nation with the largest number of nukes in the world: Russia. Clinging to the hope to be accepted by the West since Peter the Great but keep getting rejected and keep getting killed in wars after wars launched on them.
No, I'm sorry but that's just cope. You had one military that was pounding our soldiers and our top command was literally on the hot line begging Americans to stop. And our response was to close the borders - if you find that an acceptable response then I don't know what to say.Cutting off the supply lines to a Super Power on a religious mission backed up by the next 30 countries is no small task.
If you are living in the West, to give you an example of what exactly Pakistan did, you go try blocking an enteance to a bank and see what happens to you and your family. That is if you are living in the West.
In the East the guard will just put a bullet in your head. In the USA you will be shot too but in the rest of the West, they will lock you up in a mental facility for decades.
That is exactly Pakistan did, got in their way and increases their costs, one thing the Zionists love more than their own mothers is their money.
Still the Americans claimed it was the Pakistani soldiers who fired first. But it was 100% either a roided up drugged up crusade believing fundamentalist in the American/NATO uniform or the Afghan Nationap Army drug addicted scum who opened the fire first.
The point is, they did not repeat such an incident.
Yes, land border was closed. I didn't dispute that, but is that an acceptable response to a nation that has literally slaughtered your soldiers? Seriously? I'm lost for words.Incorrect - actually I remember that land border was completely closed for 6 months (November 2011 til July 2012) AND yes we closed its airspace to NATO/US + their Shamsi airfield base.
US apologized it after 6 months and regretted it.
Please google first, please double check and verify it before typing nonsense.