lightning f57
Trusted Member
Iran should preemptively attack Israel this time, if they spot an imminent attack take out those air refuelers early and their air campaign will take a huge hit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately, in light of historical lessons, the cycle of ceasefire → surprise attack → ceasefire is an effective tactic. Many nations that initially withstood the first strike have been forced to surrender within a short period due to this tactic, known since ancient times as a “peace offensive.” Philip II, the father of Alexander the Great who conquered Iran, used this method to conquer Greece and lay the foundation for his empire. No country can fight if its soldiers’ morale collapses. When the military and the people see a weak leader who easily agrees to a ceasefire only to be humiliatingly ambushed, their will to fight is lost. Even Assad collapsed so easily after being ambushed because he had agreed to a ceasefire with HTS. It was a defeat that would never have happened if the fighting had continued.More than one month of air strikes and Iran is no closer to giving him the surrender terms he wants. But he thinks a few more weeks of the same failed strategy will be the winning strategy? Delusional, and out of ideas.
Iran should preemptively attack Israel this time, if they spot an imminent attack take out those air refuelers early and their air campaign will take a huge hit.
The only way Iran to preemptively attack Iran without Iran risking trump attempting to bring nato into it by directly attacking Iran is with Hezbollah but Hezbollah is already in a low to medium level conflict with the idf there’s no actual ceasefire there like there is no ceasefire in Gaza barely a ceasefire in Iran at this pointsorry to disappoint but its not happening.....don't even expect.....
Can someone block this clown from over using and spamming the smiley face ?As of May 2026, the UK and France are leading a multinational, defensive naval mission to secure commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, not a direct invasion of Iran, following severe disruption to trade. The UK has deployed HMS Dragon, while France is positioning naval assets to protect vessels.
Keep limiting my replies because I call out your bs, very mature.
You obviously have zero military background
And no HMS dragon is parked off Cyprus!
Facts matter, once again forced to call you out![]()
This time, Putin's visit to China will see the signing of documents to elevate the diplomatic relations between the two countries. As the diplomatic relations between the countries rise, the unlocked cooperation functions between the countries will increase. From the current perspective, the decisive documents for two wars in the world should be on the table in Beijing, and who knows, maybe one day the United Nations War Mediation Committee will open in China.Putin certainly does not want the war to end. The longer the war lasts, the higher the oil prices, and the more Russia profits. But if Iran and the United States reach an agreement, Putin cannot prevent the war from ending. Putin's visit to China should be to protect Russia's interests in Iran, not to prevent the end of the war.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.