Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[BHAN85]

I wonder how exactly that is going to work when the shipping channels are predominately in Omani waters.

The working mode is pay or get a shahed visit

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

The working mode is pay or get a shahed visit

Excellent idea. Hit a ship that is in Omani waters.

 

[BHAN85]

I pray this comes to pass. Iran has shown balls the size of watermelons. Pakistan has played an honourable role for peace. Let us see now what happens. The region has changed forever.

Balls bigger than Kremlin.

Iran with the nuclear arsenal of coward Kremlin would rule the world.

 

[BHAN85]

Excellent idea. Hit a ship that is in Omani waters.

haven't they done yet?

 

[ShapurII]

It will collapse because US’ traditional client states are no longer buying its debt.

The damage Iran has done to US’ Arab poodles ensures they are even less able to prop up US’ economy.

US is massively reliant on its poodles for:

1. Buying debt
2. Recycling money into its ponzi stock market
3. Buying useless weapons at extortionate prices

Thanks to the damage Iran has done - there’ll be a lot less of that.

On top of that countries like Japan and Canada are no longer actively propping up US debt.

And the U.K. is nearly bankrupt.

There is no indication that the US client states are no longer buying its debt. The whole Western bloc and all of the US allies rely on US financial institutions for even basic banking operations. Even the US enemies rely on the US financial institutions.

The US controls the IMF, the World Bank, the SWIFT, only to name a few. There is no inter-banking system that can replace the US funded institutions like the SWIFT. Both China and Russia have been trying to do that in the last 3-4 years with almost no success.

Trust me, the Arabs will continue to prop up the US economy. Arabs financed most of this US war on Iran and will continue to do so in the future. Arab Sheikhs are corrupt to the core and most of these Arab states exist in their present forms because the US is keeping their current rulers in power.

Canada is waiting out Trump. As for Japan, I have never seen a country more obedient and submissive towards the US.

 

[Eşbah]

Irans geography makes it quite unique as well, full of mountains. Pakistan has mountains some of the biggest in the world. But not utilised for the same reasons.

Iran, Turkey and Afghanistan are very hard to conquer in theory. I would argue that Iran has more advantages. However, who needs a foreign power to attack one's country when the own leadership is so moronic? This applies in varying degrees to Iran, Turkey and Pakistan.

 

[Aziqbal]

Wow

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Meengla]

I don't think Trump is the only problem in the US. The republican party is full of war hawks and fascists. I would personally take Trump over psychopaths like Mike Pompeo any day.

If Trump shows that his way of dealing with Iran works, expect the next US administrations to do the same and pound Iran at will. As an evidence for this, I remind you that even after Biden took the office, the US never returned to its obligations in the JCPOA because Trump had already proved that you could violate a deal with Iran and get away with it.

I disagree. The influence of a President's personal biases is way too strong and now with decreasing 'checks and balances'. Look up how many US Presidents Netanyahu had approached--going all the way back to Bill Clinton--for this war on Iran. Even G.W. Bush, despite he rage after 9/11, had denied Netanyahu to attack Iran.
Trump, for whatever reasons, is either ideologically too Zionists or his personally compromised by the Epstein Files. And both are personal factors--not long term US interests.
So I repeat: There will never be another President after Trump who'd launch a war on Iran like this one. Never.

PS. Biden too was personally a Zionist. These old--very old--bigots live in an era long gone in America. But he did think about reviving JCPOA initially in his term but didn't have the courage--or the stamina--to face the AIPAC which Obama did face.

 

[tsunset]

To be fair the “gentleman” you are speaking to is also on the spectrum I definitely disagree with the other guy but seeing that this is guy is just as bad is kind of laughable that you replied to this guy.
Have the ability to call out both sides and no way you haven’t seen his many troll posts

I'm not trolling, i'm being realistic and lucid

They struck Tehran and all Iran's cities and Iran shouldn't hit Las Vegas and Miami?

They call the traitors inside Iran "Freedom Fighters" and heroes and we're supposed to call theirs traitors?

Unfortunately many people here still follows the white supremacist logic in which they are superior to everyone else on earth

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

Iran, Turkey and Afghanistan are very hard to conquer in theory. I would argue that Iran has more advantages. However, who needs a foreign power to attack one's country when the own leadership is so moronic? This applies in varying degrees to Iran, Turkey and Pakistan.

Not hard to see how a land invasion would have significant challenges.

 

[RocketLaw]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

already post here?

 

[ShapurII]

I disagree. The influence of a President's personal biases is way too strong and now with decreasing 'checks and balances'. Look up how many US Presidents Netanyahu had approached--going all the way back to Bill Clinton--for this war on Iran. Even G.W. Bush, despite he rage after 9/11, had denied Netanyahu to attack Iran.
Trump, for whatever reasons, is either ideologically too Zionists or his personally compromised by the Epstein Files. And both are personal factors--not long term US interests.
So I repeat: There will never be another President after Trump who'd launch a war on Iran like this one. Never.

PS. Biden too was personally a Zionist. These old--very old--bigots live in an era long gone in America. But he did think about reviving JCPOA initially in his term but didn't have the courage--or the stamina--to face the AIPAC which Obama did face.

George Bush would've done the same in a blink after the series of events following the assassination of Gen. Soleimani and the fall of Syria. Iran slowly lost its deterrence and the January protests convinced Trump that Netanyahu was right. There were three turning points: 1. Assassination of General Soleimani, 2. Fall of Syria, 3. Mahsa Amini and subsequent protests. These factors convinced the US that regime change was finally possible.

Biden did not even try to revive the JCPOA. He didn't provoke Iran militarily but he did follow Trump's policies regarding the "maximum pressure campaign".

 

[Meengla]

Not hard to see how a land invasion would have significant challenges.

It seems like only the eternal cannon-fodders the Russians are into massive land invasions.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

George Bush would've done the same in a blink after the series of events following the assassination of Gen. Soleimani and the fall of Syria. Iran slowly lost its deterrence and the January protests convinced Trump that Netanyahu was right. There were three turning points: 1. Assassination of General Soleimani, 2. Fall of Syria, 3. Mahsa Amini and subsequent protests. These factors convinced the US that regime change was finally possible.

Biden did not even try to revive the JCPOA. It didn't provoke Iran militarily but it did follow Trump's policies regarding the "maximum pressure campaign".

Regarding Bush 43; at the time, you had the war hawks John McCain and John Bolton pushing for strikes on Iran. For reasons unbeknownst to me, Maverick has a serious hard-on for Iran. Bolton simply wanted an expanded war. Bush resisted.

Along comes the first Trump term. Bolton again pushed for war with Iran. Outside of the removal of Soleimani and withdrawing from Obama's "deal", Iran was pretty much left alone.

 

[Meengla]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

already post here?

Thanks for the video. Good to hear straight from the horse's mouth!