Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

WELL DONE DANA BASH... GREAT QUESTION.. NETENYAHU REALLY LOOKED CORNERED AND SHOOKED..
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Dana Bash is a huge zionist. This is likely a ruse to show some sort of independence/neutrality from CNN. They got bought by Ellison and their empire, and are now firmly part of the zionist media machine. Do not fall for this.
 
I have two economic indicators for you:

Oil prices before signing the MoU: $105 per barrel.
Oil prices after signing the MoU: $70 per barrel.

1 USD against Iranian Toman after signing the MoU: 150K.
1 USD against Iranian Toman right now: 180K.

If you think Trump is boiling in the pot, you're looking at the wrong pot, or live in the world of fantasy.
oil price decline was the reward to the US for stopping its aggression. Now that the US has resumed its aggression, the oil price will go back up , causing pain to the US and its allies.

Don't miss the forest for the trees. Look at the larger picture. The US dragged the whole region into an un-necessary war, failed to crush Iran, failed to protect its allies, and is being pushed around by Iran, a country with a vastly inferior military and economy. The whole world is seeing the American emperor with no clothes.
 
oil price decline was the reward to the US for stopping its aggression. Now that the US has resumed its aggression, the oil price will go back up , causing pain to the US and its allies.

Don't miss the forest for the trees. Look at the larger picture. The US dragged the whole region into an un-necessary war, failed to crush Iran, failed to protect its allies, and is being pushed around by Iran, a country with a vastly inferior military and economy. The whole world is seeing the American emperor with no clothes.
Iran's been selling its oil at $120 per barrel. Like fixed price. Plus the toll fees too.

Tasnim reported Iran made $60 billion in oil sales in just three months since the ceasefire.
 
The people who claimed Iran was handling this perfectly and had won the war can now see why their comments were extremely stupid.
How should they have handled it ?
They fought eight countries including two nuclear armed nations. IRGC flipped the tables on the Americans.
Every move shows the world the Epstein class can not be trusted.
Taking in $20 billion is not exactly pocket change .

You were the one talking about the drought and how it was the incompetence of the regime and how your family supposedly in Tehran didn’t have water. What happened? The war proved the US actively was manipulating the weather.

Iran handled the war and post war quite well.
 
Last edited:
every time iran says they will respond disproportionately the next time the U.S. attacks

And every time Iran responds proportionately by firing a few missiles at drones at Bahrain and Kuwait

Iran is becoming too predictable
 
every time iran says they will respond disproportionately the next time the U.S. attacks

And every time Iran responds proportionately by firing a few missiles at drones at Bahrain and Kuwait

Iran is becoming too predictable
And because of this Iran has not established deterrance because it keeps getting hit. Which begs the question what is the end game of all of this.
 
It is becoming evident that Iran has yet to establish a credible deterrent. It did the correct thing by targeting ships crossing over without its permission. But then US is attempting to normalize frequent strikes against Iranian interests with minimal pushback. It's not working and this type of battles put Iran at a disadvantage.

If Iran genuinely wants to achieve deterrence, it has to shed away the passive approach. Iranian planners should seriously consider targeting US military assets or key economic interests in the Gulf instead of just symbolic strikes E.g data centres etc.
Nonsense. The fact that the US refuses to fully give up and resort to this childish tit for tat, doesn´t mean that Iran has not established deterrent. US is doing forceful diplomacy, calculated. Why haven't they touched Iran's critical infrastructure? Energy?

And if Iran didn't establish deterrance, why the MOU? Why doesn't any navy dare sail through Hormuz or the Persian Gulf?

You are, in my opinion, mixing up having established deterrance on the one hand, and forcing a full surrender by the US on the other hand. These are not the same.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top