Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

omegalamba7xl9 said:
WELL DONE DANA BASH... GREAT QUESTION.. NETENYAHU REALLY LOOKED CORNERED AND SHOOKED..
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Dana Bash is a huge zionist. This is likely a ruse to show some sort of independence/neutrality from CNN. They got bought by Ellison and their empire, and are now firmly part of the zionist media machine. Do not fall for this.
 
ShapurII said:
I have two economic indicators for you:

Oil prices before signing the MoU: $105 per barrel.
Oil prices after signing the MoU: $70 per barrel.

1 USD against Iranian Toman after signing the MoU: 150K.
1 USD against Iranian Toman right now: 180K.

If you think Trump is boiling in the pot, you're looking at the wrong pot, or live in the world of fantasy.
Click to expand...
oil price decline was the reward to the US for stopping its aggression. Now that the US has resumed its aggression, the oil price will go back up , causing pain to the US and its allies.

Don't miss the forest for the trees. Look at the larger picture. The US dragged the whole region into an un-necessary war, failed to crush Iran, failed to protect its allies, and is being pushed around by Iran, a country with a vastly inferior military and economy. The whole world is seeing the American emperor with no clothes.
 
Watandar said:
oil price decline was the reward to the US for stopping its aggression. Now that the US has resumed its aggression, the oil price will go back up , causing pain to the US and its allies.

Don't miss the forest for the trees. Look at the larger picture. The US dragged the whole region into an un-necessary war, failed to crush Iran, failed to protect its allies, and is being pushed around by Iran, a country with a vastly inferior military and economy. The whole world is seeing the American emperor with no clothes.
Click to expand...
Iran's been selling its oil at $120 per barrel. Like fixed price. Plus the toll fees too.

Tasnim reported Iran made $60 billion in oil sales in just three months since the ceasefire.
 
ShapurII said:
The people who claimed Iran was handling this perfectly and had won the war can now see why their comments were extremely stupid.
Click to expand...
How should they have handled it ?
They fought eight countries including two nuclear armed nations. IRGC flipped the tables on the Americans.
Every move shows the world the Epstein class can not be trusted.
Taking in $20 billion is not exactly pocket change .

You were the one talking about the drought and how it was the incompetence of the regime and how your family supposedly in Tehran didn’t have water. What happened? The war proved the US actively was manipulating the weather.

Iran handled the war and post war quite well.
 
Last edited:
every time iran says they will respond disproportionately the next time the U.S. attacks

And every time Iran responds proportionately by firing a few missiles at drones at Bahrain and Kuwait

Iran is becoming too predictable
 
Persian Gulf said:
every time iran says they will respond disproportionately the next time the U.S. attacks

And every time Iran responds proportionately by firing a few missiles at drones at Bahrain and Kuwait

Iran is becoming too predictable
Click to expand...
And because of this Iran has not established deterrance because it keeps getting hit. Which begs the question what is the end game of all of this.
 
Hayabusa said:
It is becoming evident that Iran has yet to establish a credible deterrent. It did the correct thing by targeting ships crossing over without its permission. But then US is attempting to normalize frequent strikes against Iranian interests with minimal pushback. It's not working and this type of battles put Iran at a disadvantage.

If Iran genuinely wants to achieve deterrence, it has to shed away the passive approach. Iranian planners should seriously consider targeting US military assets or key economic interests in the Gulf instead of just symbolic strikes E.g data centres etc.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. The fact that the US refuses to fully give up and resort to this childish tit for tat, doesn´t mean that Iran has not established deterrent. US is doing forceful diplomacy, calculated. Why haven't they touched Iran's critical infrastructure? Energy?

And if Iran didn't establish deterrance, why the MOU? Why doesn't any navy dare sail through Hormuz or the Persian Gulf?

You are, in my opinion, mixing up having established deterrance on the one hand, and forcing a full surrender by the US on the other hand. These are not the same.
 
ShapurII said:
I have two economic indicators for you:

Oil prices before signing the MoU: $105 per barrel.
Oil prices after signing the MoU: $70 per barrel.

1 USD against Iranian Toman after signing the MoU: 150K.
1 USD against Iranian Toman right now: 180K.

If you think Trump is boiling in the pot, you're looking at the wrong pot, or live in the world of fantasy.
Click to expand...
Oil back at 80 and rising. Who cares about Iranian inflation DURING war. What happens after is important. The ball hasn't fallen on the ground yet, it's still falling. In other words: this conflict is still a work in progress. Cry when inflation stays for years and nothing has been achieved, not while parties are actively trying to get the better negotiating position.
 
abgoosht said:
And because of this Iran has not established deterrance because it keeps getting hit. Which begs the question what is the end game of all of this.
Click to expand...


The only way to achieve deterrence is to search this ships that are launching the missiles and fire them.

US already knows it can't control. The Straits. So it's next strategy is to continue bombing Iranian targets from a range.

Until Iran doesn't target this ship, it will forever be under US attacks until they achieve what they want. Iran's equipment are also precious and they need to be preserved as much as possible.
 
Unsure how much of this new wave of attacks is posturing and getting an upperhand in the negotiations, we are too far down the line and both sides have too much to lose for going back to full scale war.

I think take out all the social media noise/click baits, this will be just like the last few attacks and over soon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 5 more.
    • Total: 104 (members: 21, guests: 83)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top