Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
آب که سربالا بره غورباقه هم ابوعطا میخونه

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Saudi Arabia is playing with fire and must be taught a lesson.
Pezeshkian didn't give any statement in past 3 days , for sur Pezeshkian and his government are not in same boat with military arm of Iran ...

Thats why there is inconstancy in the military operation ....

The so called reformers think they are safe , but the moment USA is finished with the so called hardliners , they are next ... Pathetic cowards to the core
 
Saudi Arabia is playing with fire and must be taught a lesson.

Easy, they had many of their bases and refinaries bombed, granted some of them were targeting US assets but not all. I would say compared to others Saudis have shown much restraint.

Also teaching them "a lesson" will pretty much drag in Pakistan
 
Those kurds are fools if they cooperate with US forces.

In just 20 years, US let in the roadside the North coalition of Aghanistan, the SDF in the north of syria and even saudis in Yemen during the air campaign.

Anyone believing US it is an ally is stupid or a child.

Orange perhaps thinks that his leverage lies in taking Iranian territory... to negotiate that against concessions. Which means they'd attempt taking chunks either in Persian gulf around the straits or open a front via Kurds.
Iran should have a plan in place to do like for like... the collateral of gulf statelets should be cashed.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


All previous reports of China supplying Iran in the middle of a war have proven to be incorrect, and I suspect this one will be too.

There is no evidence that China has provided any radar & air defense equipment to then, or now... This twitter post handle is unreliable on top aswell..
 
Easy, they had many of their bases and refinaries bombed, granted some of them were targeting US assets but not all. I would say compared to others Saudis have shown much restraint.

Also teaching them "a lesson" will pretty much drag in Pakistan
Pakistan defense deal is a defensive pact, not offensive

It is supposed to be activated if Saudi Arabia is under unprovoked attack or invasion

it is not supposed to cover Saudi's a** if they attack or invade another nation
 
This is going to be a long long war. Iran should fight this with intelligence and not emotion. There is a lot of Iranians who are emotional(and rightly so!!!!) and want a like for like thinking that is the correct approach to the war. The purpose and strategy (imho) is not to respond on a 1:1 basis as that will exhaust Iran's resources, and that strategy will cause Iran to fail this war in the long run as the USA has unlimited resources and Iran's are limited due to sanctions(this is a reality..) and economy.

The purpose is to understand there is a strategic chessboard here, where the current stage is now is on "who controls the straits". The Americans want to remove Iran's control of the straits. Iran, needs to maintain that control at minimum cost in this stage, so that for the next stage of this strategic war, Iran still has resources to fight that next stage. Iran should do what it is doing, i.e. cause global economic chaos to force pressure on the world, and selectively and surgically take out parts of the USA infrastructure in the region with each round and stop USA's attempts to exert control over the straits. Iran will take some heavy blows, but that is the reality of the asymmetry and despite the visuals and optics, Iran is still winning the battle of "who controls the straits".

Once Iran wins this battle, the Americans may attempt to come back with another battle, ie a land invasion of some sort.

I do think the core Iranian war fighting military strategists of this war are being far more cold, calculating and clinical in their decisions and this is massively frustrating the USA right now and the civilian strikes are a reflection of that.

This is game theory of war, at its extreme that we are witnessing.

Iran is not getting trapped in the theatrics of war that some here want, but more objective based.
Completely agree. Iran has few cards to play. It must play them with extremely calculated discretion. Their best bet is surely to enforce some form of de facto control over the Strait and to guard its islands in the Gulf. In fact, there seems to be little else it can do. Iran cannot totally militarily defeat USA so it has to do enough economic and supply chain harm in the SoH to convince USA that their bombing runs won't win the war for them either.

It is going to be a long one.
 
Pakistan defense deal is a defensive pact, not offensive

It is supposed to be activated if Saudi Arabia is under unprovoked attack or invasion

it is not supposed to cover Saudi's a** if they attack or invade another nation

Well, we can word it anyway we want, if Iran starts lobbing BMs at Riyadh and Pak does nothing that is the end of that....
 
All previous reports of China supplying Iran in the middle of a war have proven to be incorrect, and I suspect this one will be too.

There is no evidence that China has provided any radar & air defense equipment to then, or now... This twitter post handle is unreliable on top aswell..
This is according to Iranian opposition

In any case I will delete it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top