Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

It is obvious that Iranian pilots were trying to bomb American bases and their terrorist hideoits. People of Qatar or any other Arab country have never been subject to Iranian attacks.

Right after Iranian media showed pieces of American fighter jet and drones downed by Iranian airdefense systems, Qatari dogs of USA started publishing such video clips boasting about downing and capturing Iranian jets and pilots.

There is a possibility that USA is trying to make it a personal matter between Iranians and these Arab rats.

Not going to end well for Qatari rats hiding behind American terrorists in any ways. They are prone to Iran's missiles strikes. Let's wait and see how it will end for them esp after their foreign minister the rat denied capturing Iranian pilots.
 
It is obvious that Iranian pilots were trying to bomb American bases and their terrorist hideoits. People of Qatar or any other Arab country have never been subject to Iranian attacks.

Right after Iranian media showed pieces of American fighter jet and drones downed by Iranian airdefense systems, Qatari dogs of USA started publishing such video clips boasting about downing and capturing Iranian jets and pilots.

There is a possibility that USA is trying to make it a personal matter between Iranians and these Arab rats.

Not going to end well for Qatari rats hiding behind American terrorists in any ways. They are prone to Iran's missiles strikes. Let's wait and see how it will end for them esp after their foreign minister the rat denied capturing Iranian pilots.
These are the same Qatari Camel F****rs who Iran helped out not too long ago when they were under embargo by their Saudi cousins!
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Those aircrafts were shot down by Qatari airforce F-15s. If Iran did not launched any rescue mission at the time then these pilots are likely martyred.

Tbh, those pilots were on their one-way mission. It was not possible to return because of massive generational technological gap between fighter jets of US/Qatar versus Iran. Its also quite possible that the old generation fighter jet didn't even give a warning to eject. As modern air to air missiles have strong EW of its own.
 
Let's wait and see how it will end for them esp after their foreign minister the rat denied capturing Iranian pilots.

I remember when this happened, the Iranian friends were making fun of Qatar and sending jokes in sarcastic way. like they were denying any such thing happened. When I said Qataris did shot down Iranian jets, then many people made laughing emojis. In other words not accepting it. Now Iran itself has accepted the fact.

Qatar has shown the proofs that those aircrafts were shot down over Sea and parts of aircrafts were being recovered from the sea implying that Its likely possible the pilots never made out. So, What is proofs that Iran is holding that its claiming that 3 pilots are in Qatar's captivity?
 
Those aircrafts were shot down by Qatari airforce F-15s. If Iran did not launched any rescue mission at the time then these pilots are likely martyred.

Tbh, those pilots were on their one-way mission. It was not possible to return because of massive generational technological gap between fighter jets of US/Qatar versus Iran. Its also quite possible that the old generation fighter jet didn't even give a warning to eject. As modern air to air missiles have strong EW of its own.
Unfortunately It is true.
But that makes them braver. Like special attack group of japanese fighter pilots known as kamikaze.
 
Iran should prepare a special ops elite operation to go inside Qatar with helicopters with drone backup and kill Qatari prison guards and bring the pilots back to Iran safely

And threaten total destruction if they retaliate or speak against it

If the US can do it then Iran can do it
 

Erdogan blocked Kurdish forces from entering Iran war



Connor Stringer

8–10 minutes

Turkish president’s fear of arming separatists pulls plug on Netanyahu’s covert regime change gamble

Benjamin Netanyahu took his seat in the White House Situation Room.

Sitting opposite Donald Trump on Feb 11, the Israeli prime minister laid out the conditions under which Iran’s brittle regime could be toppled as he tried to convince the president to go to war.

“He told Trump that if we are able to do certain things, we have a chance of creating conditions where the Iranian people could take their fate into their own hands,” a senior Israeli official who was in the room told The Telegraph.

Part of his pitch rested on an ambitious gamble of sending thousands of Kurdish fighters into Tehran’s western frontier under American air cover.

Under a mission developed by Mossad and discussed with the CIA, they would surge across the border of Iraqi Kurdistan and fuel an uprising that would bring down the Ayatollahs once and for all.

There was, however, one man he had failed to account for: Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The Turkish leader, unhappy with the prospect of armed Kurdish forces in the region, intervened and eventually forced Israel and the United States to pull the plug on the covert operation, The Telegraph understands.

“Several of these conditions did not materialise because of reasons that I won’t get into,” the official added. “It’s not for lack of insight, but for either operational failure or decisions that were made,” he added, hinting at the botched plan.

Mr Erdogan, one of the president’s favoured world leaders, is understood to have told the US president that he would not tolerate Kurdish independence anywhere in the region, according to Israeli and Gulf sources.

His objection stemmed from a decades-old fear of Kurdish separatism.

For more than 40 years, Turkey has fought the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, known as the PKK, a Kurdish militant and political organisation, at a cost of tens of thousands of lives.

The Kurds are the world’s largest stateless ethnic group, primarily split across Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey, where many have experienced severe discrimination and abuse.

Israel has actively cultivated ties with the Kurds, a group they see as a potentially destabilising force they can leverage for their own means. The Kurds in Iran suffered under the Shah, and then later the Islamic Republic.

Upon learning of the plan, the Turkish leader feared that arming the Kurdish militias would see swathes of his political enemies armed and dangerous on Turkey’s eastern border, a position he could not risk.

His intervention helped doom one of the most ambitious attempts at regime change in a war that has collapsed into a quagmire and fallen short of its objectives.

Mr Trump has said that regime change was achieved twice already, and the new government is far more “reasonable” than its predecessors.

Yet the US president continues to insist that regime change was not one of his objectives, which have shifted between reopening the Strait of Hormuz, ending support for Iranian proxies and eradicating its nuclear and missile programmes.

Following the Situation Room meeting, US officials assessed that the elements of Mr Netanyahu’s pitch, which included the possibility of the Kurds mounting a ground invasion of Iran, were detached from reality, according to the New York Times.

When Mr Trump was briefed by John Ratcliffe, the director of the CIA, he used one word to describe the Israeli prime minister’s regime change scenarios: “farcical.”

Still, it did not stop Mr Trump from pursuing the idea.

He spoke with Kurdish leaders on March 1 and continued to lobby local officials who may be able to leverage Tehran’s weakness to make gains.

In an apparent preparation for an assault, Israel bombed positions in western Iran, including regime officials, army bases, missile systems, police stations and Basij sites, leading to speculation that it was paving a path for a Kurdish advance.

The attack from Iraqi Kurdistan was reported to include fighters from all six factions of Iranian Kurds, who would in turn provide weapons to Kurds inside of Iran.

The militant coalition was poised to invade on March 18. All it needed was the go-ahead from Mr Trump.

“If we are not on this battlefield, the end of the regime will either not occur or be delayed by a lot,” Babasheikh Hosseini, the general secretary of the Khabat Organisation, told The Telegraph in the opening days of the war.

“If our [forces] were on the ground, and we told the people of Rojhelat to rise, then the fall of the regime would have been much closer by now.”

Amid the preparations, the Kurds themselves began to express wariness about their prospects against the Iranian regime and began demanding “political guarantees” aside from just military support.

“The intelligence didn’t promise that [regime change] would happen. It said you could advance the probability or the possibility that would happen,” the senior Israeli official told The Telegraph.

Soon after the plan began to unravel, details of the advance found their way into the American media.

Fox News reported in March that an offensive had begun which forced Karoline Leavitt, the outgoing White House press secretary, to clarify that the US was not arming the Kurds for that purpose.

At the same time, Mr Erdogan is understood to have been lobbying Washington to axe the plan. Gulf states also reportedly warned that ethnic partition of Iran could destabilise the Middle East as a whole.

Recommended

The failure did not go down well in Jerusalem. Roman Gofman, the director of Mossad, decided to remove two of the agency’s most senior officials, who had helped draft the regime change plan.

In their latest Oval Office meeting on July 28, the topic of regime change came up again, insiders told The Telegraph.

Mr Netanyahu had conveyed that regime change was still possible under certain conditions, but he seemed to fail to convince Mr Trump, who ultimately opted for a prolonged economic campaign, rather than strikes, to bring an end to the war.

Donald Trump has been unsuccessful in almost every move he has made to bring the war with Iran to a close.

Regime change was supposed to be an off-ramp. That, too, has failed.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top