Kyussis
Trusted Member
Another laundry room fire!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trump cannot pay reparations for the same reason he cannot remove sanctions. That would be the fastest route to remind congress that they can limit presidential power. The toll is a real way to get reparations over time, otherwise Iran will find itself wondering for several decades where the money is just as Vietnam was after that war ended.Iran should signal that if the US compensates for war damages, it will refrain from imposing a toll on the Strait of Hormuz.
This, american congress is filled with zionist agents, no way they agree to anything that even remotely favors iran.trump cannot pay reparations for the same reason he cannot remove sanctions. That would be the fastest route to remind congress that they can limit presidential power. The toll is a real way to get reparations over time, otherwise Iran will find itself wondering for several decades where the money is just as Vietnam was after that war ended.
problem here is lack of trust:Does anyone disagree with me on this Issue?
====
Iran should signal that if the US compensates for war damages, it will refrain from imposing a toll on the Strait of Hormuz.
However, if Iran genuinely intends to collect a toll on Hormuz regardless, I would advise against that approach, as it risks costing Iran its international support and could ultimately lead to its defeat by the US.
Here's why:
If Iran limits its demand to war reparations alone, other countries will have a clear incentive to pressure Trump into accepting the demand or negotiating a compromise. A narrowly framed, damage-based claim is something the international community can rally behind and push for diplomatically.
But if Iran instead reveals that its real intention is to collect a toll from Hormuz, it changes the nature of the dispute entirely. Other countries would no longer be able to pressure Trump on Iran's behalf, since Iran would no longer be seen as simply seeking redress, it would be seen as leveraging a strategic chokepoint for economic gain. In that scenario, the rest of the world would have little choice but to absorb the economic fallout of the standoff, however long it lasts.
And should this escalate into a prolonged confrontation with the global economy itself, the odds increasingly favour Iran's defeat rather than its success.
so much winning ...
Naa average American is flinching when it’s 4 dollars regular 5 at diesel trump doesn’t care it’s his ego at this point the whole world could burn and crumble and all he cares about is winning a war that only person and country is winning in the short term is Bibi and Israel man long term you got to ask what the Iranians are thinking of doing to everyoneStill cheap. Americans will only flinch if it is 10 dollars a litre.
Unless they're out on the streets protesting, its not affecting them as badly. 10 a litre is where I draw the line. Stomach for punishment may be a lot higher though.Naa average American is flinching when it’s 4 dollars regular 5 at diesel trump doesn’t care it’s his ego at this point the whole world could burn and crumble and all he cares about is winning a war that only person and country is winning in the short term is Bibi and Israel man long term you got to ask what the Iranians are thinking of doing to everyone