Let's analyze it rationally. We have two options:
Option 1: Keep the status quo which means that Iran might get nuked in the future, our currency will depreciate by 60%-70% every year, over half of the population will live in absolute poverty soon, and eventually, Iran will be balkanized and devoured by regional powers in the Middle East.
Option 2: Get rid of the current ideology that has disarmed and impoverished our country in support of people who don't even like us and take a risk for a better future. Sure, Iran might lose some territories, but that's more than granted if this regime stays in power. Do you think this people who couldn't even get close to the area of the pilots during the war can keep our territorial integrity without even the means of transporting our troops?
So, option 1 is balkanization + potentially getting nuked + poverty, lack of civilian and military transport and eventual disarmament after defeat.
And option 2 is balkanization. Which one do you think is worse?
And what makes you think I want that?
You chose option 1, if I'm not mistaken. You guys just do not want to accept that we have reached a deadend. And there were many people who warned the system of this day for decades, but the system chose to continue this path.
Before Khamenei's death, people blamed it on Khamenei but who is to blame for it now?