Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Translation- the Balochi insurgency that ISI launched on Iran didn't work. time for a reset.
Baluchis are seen as similar to Kurds by Western/Israeli intelligence aka potentially useful pawns. The UAE has been caught sponsoring insurgency in Pakistani Baluchistan in the past, and may again be active via Afghanistan. The UAE has an axe to grind against both Iran/Pakistan and sees both Chabahar and Gwadar as threats to its ports.
 
The old guard in the IRGC at the time of the revolution would have been young men, fired up to free their nation from a dictator and make Iran strong. I wonder if the newer blood has the same ideological thinking. Western news outlets keep repeating the young population in Iran are very pro-western, that is kind of implying they dont have the same revolutionary zeal. Does make one wonder what the next set of generations for the IRGC will be like and whether they will have similar aspirations like Brigadier-General Hossein Yekta.

The old guard is the reason Iran is paralyzed today.

The ones that kept the revolutionary fire died in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen the last 10-15 years. While the ones that softened and lost the revolutionary fire and even went towards corruption ($$$$) stayed in Iran behind a desk job.

So undoubtedly, I think the younger generations are substantially more willing to escalate than the boomer generals Iran has today.
 
View attachment 219689

View attachment 219690


Why has the CSG suddenly entered these waters when they haven’t been here before? Why operate so far away from Oman and Arabian Sea? Because they want to drag Pakistan into this mess when Iranian anti ship anti ship ballistic missiles fall in areas dominated by Pakistani merchant vessels!

This can only be done with the explicit approval of Munir!

Trump is using his puppets one after another in the hopes to extract some sort of concession from iran, was inevitable to be honest.

Then these same army men and their arse lickers will cry crocodile tears 10 years down the line when iran build relations with india.


When iran build relations with India.... Getting the excuses in early....
 
When iran build relations with India.... Getting the excuses in early....

How do you want Iran to “build” economic relations with Pakistan when it closes the border and refused to finish its own share of the gas pipeline. Stop being a troll.

It’s not like Pakistan has offered economic deals to Iran and Iran has rejected them. Pakistan has no independent economic policy. It’s economic policy is set by Washington and Riyadh. You saw how fast the PGCC countries demanded loan payment when Pakistan didn’t follow their orders.

So if economic “relations” with Pakistan means Iran becomes the piggy bank for Pakistan and gives billions in loans and handouts like Saudi Arabia does, then Iran cannot do such a thing even if it had the vast financial resources Saudi Arabia does.

So far there hasn’t been any proposed economic arrangement from Pakistan side that Iran has rejected.
 


How do you want Iran to “build” economic relations with Pakistan when it closes the border and refused to finish its own share of the gas pipeline. Stop being a troll.

It’s not like Pakistan has offered economic deals to Iran and Iran has rejected them. Pakistan has no independent economic policy. It’s economic policy is set by Washington and Riyadh. You saw how fast the PGCC countries demanded loan payment when Pakistan didn’t follow their orders.

So if economic “relations” with Pakistan means Iran becomes the piggy bank for Pakistan and gives billions in loans and handouts like Saudi Arabia does, then Iran cannot do such a thing even if it had the vast financial resources Saudi Arabia does.

So far there hasn’t been any proposed economic arrangement from Pakistan side that Iran has rejected.


Sure, at the first chance you can grab to cultivate YET MORE DISCORD, seemingly you jump at the chance, you have a readymade narrative, of course you do.

Perhaps introspect, you have many more nations uneasy about Irans ambitions and too bad, they have a right to do so

By all means pursue relations with nethanyahus favourite nation, the mask is apparently off so why hide
 
Yosef Pezeshkian the son of reckless said
حیات و ممات ما به غنی سازی وابسته نیست
ظریف و قائم پناه و بقیه اصلاح طلبان هم میگن غنی سازی و انرژی هسته ای پیف پیف چیز بدیه و بدیم بره

ولی مثل اینکه مردم و نیروهای نظامی ما بیدار هستند و اگه این دولت اصلاح طلب روی کار نبود ما الان به اندازه کره شمالی روی موشک هامون بمب هسته‌ای سوار کرده بودیم

الان جلیلی روی کار بود چیزی از اسراییل و نیروهای امریکایی توی منطقه باقی نمانده بود


Speaker of Political Affairs of IRGC: our revolutionary people want us to make nukes to protect ourselves

The public demand for officials to reconsider the country’s nuclear doctrine has been growing at an unprecedented rate. The main reason for this widespread and unprecedented demand, voiced by ordinary citizens and even intellectuals, is, on the one hand, the second and third imposed wars launched by the American-Zionist enemy and, on the other, threats by the adversaries following their heavy defeats on the military battlefield, including the possible use of nuclear weapons in an attempt to alter the balance of power.

Given my organizational responsibilities, over the past several months, the nuclear issue has been raised repeatedly by members of the public at virtually every meeting and gathering I have attended, as well as at every nighttime rally where I have had the opportunity to deliver a speech. People have consistently asked questions about this issue and called for a change in the Islamic Republic’s policies and approach.

However, what prompted me to write this commentary, under the title given above, was the contents of a leaflet expressing these demands that young people were distributing among the public at a nighttime rally in Tehran’s Enghelab Square last Thursday evening.

I had the privilege of attending this magnificent and grand gathering, particularly because it coincided with the birth anniversary of Hazrat Zaynab (peace be upon her) and National Nurses’ Day. After receiving and reading one of the leaflets, I immediately decided, given the widespread nature of the demand it expressed, to write a commentary addressing this public demand at the earliest opportunity.

Referring to what it described as an existential war between the United States, the Zionist regime, and Iran, as well as recent threats by Trump and Rubio, the leaflet highlighted a demand that, according to its authors, has emerged in public opinion and is being directed at the Vali-ye Faqih (the Supreme Leader). The demand is for a “change in the fatwa based on the dynamism of Shiite jurisprudence and secondary rulings.”

The leaflet cited three religious and jurisprudential principles in support of this general demand:

  1. The principle of necessity (the rule permitting the consumption of carrion): In situations of hardship and necessity, what is ordinarily forbidden may become permissible.
  2. The prohibition against the shedding of Muslim blood: Protecting the lives of Muslims takes precedence over everything else.
  3. The Quranic verse, “And prepare against them whatever you are able…”: This is an injunction to make the utmost preparations to instill fear in the enemies of God and the enemies of the believers.

The leaflet explicitly calls for a change in the fatwa. Under a prominent heading, “Nuclear Weapons: A Shield, Not a Sword,” it explains the purpose of its demand to change the country’s nuclear doctrine and pursue the development of nuclear weapons as follows:

“Nuclear weapons are for deterrence, for dispelling the shadow of war, not for use. Just as North Korea, with a few warheads, enjoys complete deterrence against the United States.”

At the end of this demand-oriented statement on nuclear policy, the conclusion is summarized in a single sentence:

“Calling for a change in the fatwa and giving the Vali and Imam of the community greater latitude to develop a deterrent weapon is a rational, jurisprudential, and security necessity.”

It appears that, given the growing public demand for a change in the nuclear doctrine, this demand may become a widespread discourse in Iranian society in the not-too-distant future.

امیدوارم ذلت طلبان و غرب گداها زمانی از خواب بیدار نشن که ما بمب خوردیم و بعدشم مثل بنی صدر ملعون به خارج فرار کنند
 
Last edited:
@r3alist …

@Immortals might reply by telling Pakistan to,

“pursue relations with nethanyahus piggy bank nation USA and chump Saudis - the mask is apparently off so why hide?”

A very black pot calling an electric kettle black?

Btw, every single Muslim nation has investment and trading relations with India except Pakistan. So, why beat up Iran and Bangladesh constantly?
 
Having nukes means you can escalate without fearing a nuclear Armageddon.

The reason Iran hasn’t sunk an aircraft carrier is because that would 100% invite a nuclear strike.

Iran has been forced to restrain its conventional forces because it fears a nuclear strike.

If Iran had nukes US wouldn’t be able to blockade Iran’s cargo ships.

If the mullahs sign another nuclear deal - IRGC should overthrow them.
Yes I agree with most of this, that's why I said helps u on the escalation ladder.

But it still wouldn't have stopped them attacking Iran.
 
Yes I agree with most of this, that's why I said helps u on the escalation ladder.

But it still wouldn't have stopped them attacking Iran.

I agree it wouldn’t prevent an attack because USA has nukes.

But a non nuke country would never dare instigate a war.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top