Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do we prevent Israel to carry out future operations like this and cause damage within Iran in the future?
E.g for Israel, they are investing more in AD to counter the Iranian Missile threat.
So instead of being a free and proud nation, was it better for Iran to be a slave puppet dog of US/Israel like KSA/UAE/Jordan are with no respect?
SLBMs and a fleet of submarines that can launch them, even if they are conventional, are still the most expensive and difficult part of a nuclear triad. For Iran, which has its biggest enemies close by, the use of BMs - MRBM/IRBM/ICBM - is the most practical and easy way to implement. In addition, Iran's geography also becomes an ally factor in creating a nuclear system based on road vehicles for BM launches.Why doesn't Iran develop SLBM and a submarine fleet that can be positioned in the Red Sea or the Mediterranean?
Bavar-373 is not fully deployed yet, maybe one battery in Tehran at mostInteresting they do not claim hits on Bavar-373 which are probably more numerous now 5 years after the system came into service.
Does this means that they only had reach of S-300 or maybe the Bavar-373 is a much better system and managed to shoot down all incoming projectiles?
The fact that the damage is minor and Iran is able to repair already suggests that no critical systems like radars were hit.
As i said above, S-300, S-400 is a big name when it comes to propagandaInteresting they do not claim hits on Bavar-373 which are probably more numerous now 5 years after the system came into service.
Does this means that they only had reach of S-300 or maybe the Bavar-373 is a much better system and managed to shoot down all incoming projectiles?
The fact that the damage is minor and Iran is able to repair already suggests that no critical systems like radars were hit.
How do we prevent Israel to carry out future operations like this and cause damage within Iran in the future?
E.g for Israel, they are investing more in AD to counter the Iranian Missile threat.
Israel also made an effort to hit specific targets, despite its precision, it is impossible not to say that Israel did not make an effort to carry out the attack. The tyranny of distance is the basis for such reasoning.Iran does need to rethink its precision attack capabilities for sure. Look how Israel hit specific buildings, whereas Iran struggled to target specific targets, but "areas" where targets are located, in the 'hope' that they hit it. I do think that they have that realisation now though. Lessons learnt, and improvement plans will be put in place for sure.
China serves who pays them more. Israel bought their Silk Road initiative and because of that China would only give moral support to Iran or Palestine in TV and shows.China is not really a good ally interms of coming to your aid when you need it, as does Russia so far. Look how quickly Russia delivered new systems to Iran in this recent flairup. China will never do that. China only wants money from you - and that in dollars!!
Pakistanis have been under British rule for 250 years, then the new nation Pakistan was created but unfortunately again we are under heavy western influence so we're used to the slave mentality, the mentality of being bullied, used and abused by Master west. Iran is no threat to the Usa or EU, the only reason they hate Iran is because they do not accept any independent nation, they want everyone to shine their boots, accept their cultural revolution, get rid of religion and follow the modern 21st century religion called money, power, lgbtq and the rest. For the west this is the new religion, where a man will worship himself, his desires, it's a perfect weapon against Islam and other religions such as orthodox Christianity which Russia is trying to promote.
Israel use ROCKS and LORA air launched Ballistic Missiles to attack on Iran from Iraqi airspace
with terminal trajectory shaping and a 90° attack angle
it is very difficult to intercept.
View attachment 75276
View attachment 75321
I so like advanced military technologies from Israel , Turkiye and Iran in the region
Arab Countries produce almost nothing to fight against hostile intentions
Any ALBMs, by definition, will have very small warheads. ALBMs, as a threat, is a red herring and focusing in them is misguided.Yes. One way for Israel to get around the distance problem is to launch long-range missiles from the air. In this case, it appears that Israel is using Kinzhal-style ballistic missiles, which have the advantage of range over bombs, but are lacking in their payload. While an F-15E fighter can easily attack with 6 tons of bombs that can be distributed among a dozen targets, if it takes one or two Rocks, the volume of fire and damage caused is very limited. But it is what can be done. The only Israeli fighter that can reach Tehran and return without needing to refuel is the F-15C. All others would need to refuel at some point, either on the way there or on the way back.
Furthermore, the videos that have emerged of the F-15C demonstrate an unusual sight: an F-15C with conformal fuel tanks. Israel is one of the only single-seat F-15 operators that use CFT.
There is talk of around 100 aircraft. And of these “one hundred” many may not be weapon carriers (fighters). If they were long-range missiles, there would be a maximum of around 200 missiles launched.
It is worth noting that Israel can perfectly justify the use of long-range missiles due to the distance of 1,500 km between the two countries and the fact that there are countries between them.
In my opinion, one of Israel’s objectives in this attack was to show that it can reach Tehran and that the closure of Jordanian and Iraqi airspace does not prevent it from doing so, one way or another. If the Iranians thought they were safe due to the distance, this makes it clear that they are not.
The attack was not larger due to several factors, but it makes it clear that Israel can reach any point in Iran with impunity by combining SEAD/DEAD activity with stealth fighters and long-range air-to-surface missiles.
It is very likely that the missiles were launched from Iraqi Kurdistan. Tehran was hit and it is about 600 km from the Iraqi border in a straight line with Israel.
The long-range air-launched missiles that Israel has are:
1. Delilah: 250 km range. Subsonic cruise missile. Did not happen.
2. Rampage: 250 km range. Supersonic ballistic missile. Did not happen.
3. Ice Breaker: cruise, subsonic, 300 km. Did not happen.
4. Rocks: unknown range but likely to be over 1,000 km. Little is known about it but it would be a hypersonic ballistic missile similar to the Kinzhal. Likely.
5. Air LORA: ballistic, supersonic, 1000 km +-. Likely. –
In other words, if Israeli planes hit Tehran and did not enter Iranian airspace, it could only have been with missiles such as the Rocks and Air LORA. Both are not recognized by Israel as being operational.