Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Nuffle said:
It is a desperate attempt to call Israel's attack a complete success like this:
threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @FluteMagician on Thread Reader App

@FluteMagician: 1) So when I saw the first reports of this last night and read aircraft were used, I knew two things: A) Aerial refueling was necessary. B) Air defense suppression was necessary. But rather than...…
threadreaderapp.com threadreaderapp.com
threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @gregbagwell on Thread Reader App

@gregbagwell: A short🧵1/9 on the Israeli air raids into Iran yesterday. This was more than a precision strike, it was a clear demonstration of capability, intent and will. [This replaces a previous thread that mista...…
threadreaderapp.com threadreaderapp.com
Click to expand...
Read the wikipedia page (if you are not cardiac), it is hilarious but also shows clearly how Wikipedia works
 
This Israeli attack was more or less the most they could achieve, and even their own officials are laughing at their propaganda. Israeli attack was 10% actual damage and 90% invented damage by the western propaganda media.



In contrast, Irans previous two attacks were extremely toned down. This will now change. Western media propaganda won’t be able to do much damage control when 1000-2000 missile to come raining down on the Israeli heads.
 
Last edited:
Hypersonic said:
This Israeli attack was more or less the most they could achieve, and even their own officials are laughing at their propaganda. Israeli attack was 10% actual damage and 90% invented damage by the western propaganda media.



In contrast, Irans previous two attacks were extremely toned down. This will now change.
Click to expand...

Iran crucially needs precision

I don't know how Iran is working to upgrade the accuracy, specially those of big liquid fueled MRBMs, i really hope this will improve by any mean possible

I can't trust in "Iran did it on purpose to de escalate", but this is a possibility

In TP Iran shown that it could inflict psychological damage to Israel

In TP2 Iran shown that it doesn't care of Israel AD and ABM shield

TP3= ? I hope this will be that Iran shows how it can accurately hit targets with decent destruction while at the same time dodge ABM shield
 
tsunset said:
Iran crucially needs precision

I don't know how Iran is working to upgrade the accuracy, specially those of big liquid fueled MRBMs, i really hope this will improve by any mean possible

I can't trust in "Iran did it on purpose to de escalate", but this is a possibility

In TP Iran shown that it could inflict psychological damage to Israel

In TP2 Iran shown that it doesn't care of Israel AD and ABM shield

TP3= ? I hope this will be that Iran shows how it can accurately hit targets with decent destruction while at the same time dodge ABM shield
Click to expand...
Newer generation solid fuelled systems such as KS-1/ KS-2, Fattah 1 etc are very accurate. The older liquid fuelled systems will have lower CEPs and Iran will be using them mostly as cluster warhead delivery systems and also to saturate the air defences. I bet Iran has 1000s of Rezvans which are dirt cheap, and will be used as above.

Iran has yet to use its most new missiles such as Fattah and Khormshahr-4 etc in any attack. And bear in mind these are the known Iranian missiles, in reality they have even more advanced systems. The missiles used and lack of silo launch etc tells me these previous two attacks were nothing but warning shots in a sense, confirming what was stated by Iran itself.
 
Last edited:
LongLiveIran said:
Yes. That's why I was wondering if using underground silos would make a difference.
It seems that we completely lack the element of surprise against Israel.
Click to expand...
There are pros and cons to underground launch silos and mobile launchers. With the exception of the US, no other nation is going to have a warning BM in silos are about to launch especially if they are solid fuel... the cons are they are vulnerable to a first strike.
 
Reports are coming out that the Israeli cabinet has authorised a second strike on Iran in retaliation for the strike on Bibis house
Any solid confirmation of this yet?
 
Persian Gulf said:
the magazines can launch 5 missiles at a time (rather, 5 per 5-10 minutes because it launches one, moves along, launches the second, etc)

so that's not a perfect solution unless there are 20+ of those magazine systems across Iran (not likely)
Click to expand...
Persian Gulf said:
the magazines seem to be somewhat new and can only launch 5 per 5-10 minutes, we need 20+ of those to be meaningful. great if we have those numbers but I doubt it, in last two strikes we fired from 5-10 bases in total not 20+

concealed trucks that were used in TP 2 are useful if they can be fuelled and then dispersed to live as civilian trucks until the strike
Click to expand...
I don’t know I was busy at work but I looked it up on wiki the system was unveiled in 2020 so hypothetically it was around for a few year longer than that by now you would think they would have upgraded and tweaked it to make it even more efficient and plentiful.
 
🇺🇸 Former CIA Officer Reveals THAAD System Limitations

Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, wrote on X about the limitations of the THAAD system:

The U.S. has only 9 THAAD systems, each launcher having only 8 missiles.
If Iran were to launch 100 missiles at Israel, even assuming a 100% perfect performance by the 2 systems sent by the U.S. to Israel, 84 Iranian missiles would bypass the system.

Lockheed Martin has produced only a 1000 missiles for this system, with each missile costing $12.5 million.


💬 Note: Iran has at least 500,000 ballistic missiles that can be ready to launch in a short time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 148 (members: 10, guests: 138)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top