The Houthis (Yemen) have been bombed for decades by the U.S. and UK, and suffered a territorial invasion backed by bombings from +10 U.S. puppet states + CIA/MOSSAD black ops groups. Result? The Houthis took the capital and remain there to this day—stronger than ever. They’ve been hit by multiple B-2 strikes, yet nothing changes because all their modern weapons are hidden in ultra-deep bunkers that only multiple nuclear strikes could reach.
None of the Houthis' good weapons were destroyed by bombings, the proof is that they continued to launch missiles at Israel and still hit targets! And no boat can get through the Houthi embargo.
Iran (today) is far stronger than Yemen,Vietnã, Afeganistan or Saddam’s Iraq ever was, and here’s the problem:
- There are no troops for an invasion. You’d need at least 350,000 U.S. soldiers (to start) given Iran’s 95 million population, but there’s nothing mobilized.
- U.S. equipment is thousands of miles away: A B-2 would take 5 hours to reach Iran and 5 hours to return to its current base, making a "war"—let alone a "weeks-long war"—unfeasible.
- Some country would have to host these assets and permit attacks from their soil, but that country would be destroyed by Iran and eternally condemned by global public opinion over Palestine, left isolated forever.
Trump has a track record. In 2020, he said:
Iran attacked the American base and Trump did nothing, where are the 52 targets? He invented that no soldier had died but then came up with the story that several soldiers had "brain concussions"
So, there’s a lot that’s fishy in this story. Besides, no war starts without a false flag—the U.S. has never invaded a country without a fabricated lie. If the Statue of Liberty were to collapse and the Zionist media blamed "Iran," *then* we’d have proof of an impending invasion (as the pretext would be set). But none of this has happened yet.
My take (which I’ve said before but will repeat): Puppet Trump will attempt a PROVOCATION, just like with Soleimani’s assassination—but this time targeting a high-profile figure in Iran (e.g., 90-year-old Ayatollah Khamenei) or nuclear facilities (though radiation fallout would mark Trump as the "new Hitler" overnight). The deployed aircraft and equipment are meant to deter retaliation after the provocation. Post-event, Trump and the Zionist lobby pulling his strings would push new "Abraham Accords" with KSA, Syria, Lebanon, etc., to media-spin that the "Palestinian cause is lost"—yet another PR stunt. Zionist military strikes are staged for narrative control, not battlefield victory.
Israel already tried to do this alone and failed—hence the
myth of 100 Israeli jets dancing through Iranian airspace and wiping out 100% of Iran’s defenses. It was all
another lie. They’ll attempt the same stunt again.The idea is that Iran will do something crazy in its military reaction(after provocation) and that this will justify a coalition of countries invading Iran in the future.
This is the plan.
NOTE: Another option would be a nuclear strike on Iran, but that would mean the end of Israel, the U.S., Trump, and the West—it’d just be a matter of time (decades) before a nuclear conflict erupted. Shiites would acquire nukes somehow and retaliate, triggering an arms race. I don’t believe this option is likely either.
