Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has expressed his gratitude towards Israel doing what he calls "the dirty work" for all of them through its bombardment of Iran.

Talking to German broadcaster ZDF on the sidelines of the G7 summit, he says: "I can only say I have the greatest respect for the fact that the Israeli army and the Israeli government had the courage to do this."

He says the Iranian leadership has "brought death and destruction to the world with attacks, with murder and manslaughter, with Hezbollah, with Hamas", but adds that if they are to return to the negotiating table, "there would be no need for further military interventions".

If not, Merz warns that the "complete destruction" of Iran's nuclear programme could be on the agenda. He says that while he assumes the programme is "largely over", Israel lacks the weapons necessary to completely destroy it, but the US does.

In a separate interview with Germany's Welt TV news channel, he says Iran's leadership had been "weakened" by Israel's attacks, and "will probably not return to its former strength, making the future of the country uncertain".

www.bbc.co.uk

Iran and Israel launch more attacks as Trump weighs US involvement

Iran and Israel continue strikes on Wednesday night, after Donald Trump says the US "may" join the Israeli attacks.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
What does he mean? Regime change happening?

The blackout seems to be related to the live that Reza pehlavi was gonna do?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Watandar said:
THIS is what the Israelis are hiding and the reason they have clamped down on foreign journalists, live feeds, uploading pics/videos to social media, and throttling of GPS and internet! They were losing the narrative war as well as getting an unexpected beating and ran to Daddy to save them.

Iran needs to deliver some more barrages and then will be in a much better position to negotiate.
Click to expand...
And for last few salvos Iran has been more precise in hitting military targets, I wonder if US threatened to get involved if Iran didnt stop hitting downtown Tel-aviv.
 
Screenshot_20250618_022245_Chrome.jpg

Again, Said by many handles in the past But Editor in Chief of Mashreq News seems a reliable source, Lets see. Huge If true.
 
Dalit said:
Iran had the chance to go nuclear long ago. Unfortunately, Iran has a supreme leader who is too idealistic. His fatwa on nuclear weapons is unrealistic. He terms nuclear weapons haram. I hate to say this, but the supreme leader has held Iran hostage. The people now want revenge and a proper response to Zionist attacks. How will Iran reply apart from drone and missile attacks when it doesn't possess a string air force and nuclear weapons? No doubt that the nuclear weapons would have discouraged Israel to attack Iran in the manner it has.
Click to expand...
the nukes are not meant to be used , even if we have it , we won't jump to use it like some loser in first week of war
 
StormBreaker said:
What does he mean? Regime change happening?

The blackout seems to be related to the live that Reza pehlavi was gonna do?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Once and for all, Pahlavi is a clown and has 0 support in Iran, and enjoys seeing his country being bombed

The Iranian opposition is a joke
 
StormBreaker said:
What does he mean? Regime change happening?

The blackout seems to be related to the live that Reza pehlavi was gonna do?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Can you explain this please?
 
Kharral said:
I am well aware of that.
I was present on the previous forum & there was thread about it I think.

What you’d call ‘chickened out’ was a very prudent thing to do. If America is threatening to invade Iran now ( pretty sure there wouldn’t be an invasion ), it would have most certainly invaded back then.

Iran is in a much stronger position today than it was in 1995-2003.
America is relatively in a much weaker position today than it was 1995-2003.
Click to expand...

Correction, brother, the U.S. isn't in a weaker position militarily; the economy can be talked about, but it's not within the scope of this thread.

When we talk about the U.S., it's not just by itself when it goes to war, it's a collection of countries from NATO aligned with other nation states.

However, Iran, in its current state, is much weaker and more exposed, as we are seeing currently.
 
tsunset said:
Once and for all, Pahlavi is a clown and has 0 support in Iran, and enjoys seeing his country being bombed

The Iranian opposition is a joke
Click to expand...
Are you currently in Iran? If not, are you in contact with anyone there or is there a complete internet blackout?

Secondly, Since pahlavi has 0 support, who could succeed Khameni if he falls?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 7 more.
    • Total: 225 (members: 31, guests: 194)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top