Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[vmro]

I dont need to provide shit, just like you haven't. The fact of the matter is, I'm Syrian with family that is directly affected and lived through it, and some who didn't make it, you have zero ties or knowledge about our country, you're not about to tell me what really happened. Period.

I agree, no one should tell you what you need to do, I expect now finally liberated from Iranian influence, democracy is going to thrive in Syria...

All the best to great Syrian people...

 

[Watandar]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

If Israel had not been hit hard, they would still be treating Iran the same way they treat Lebanon, Syria and Palestine, whey bomb wherever they wish whenever they wish for whatever reason. Israelis were in habit of watching wars on their TV screens but Iran was able to bring the war to their streets.

 

[nang2]

Iran is not some banana republic that you can play as a card whenever you wish. But I don't disagree with your comment. In fact, it confirms that it wasn't Iran that threw China under the bus, but it was the other way around.

Then do as you wish. That is why I think it would be wise for China to steer clear of Iran and only apply its influence at the sideline. Definitely not in the middle.

 

[Haz]

I get the cost to Syrians but that war was more than just a local issue, it was part of a bigger game that was being played in the region. For years the West and its GCC puppets had been spreading propaganda about a "Shia crescent" stretching from Iran to Lebanon, which they saw as a threat and the Syrian civil war was the beginning of a project to dismantle this crescent. The West/GCC were involved in funding/arming the Syrian opposition from the very first day. Thats why Iran and Russia got involved as a response. The Saudi/UAE attack on Yemen, the Israeli attack on Lebanon, the US attacks in Iraq, the assassination of Qassim Suleimani and finally the recent Israeli attack on Iran are all part of this continuing campaign.

Yes I'm aware of all of this, and its mostly true. That doesn't take away from the suffering and legitimate issues we had against his brutal regime for 50 years, and oppression we endured under his rule. Both things can be true at the same time, but we had our own internal grievances that we were fighting against and suffered through, irrespective of the geopolitical games that were going on in the region. That's what mattered most to us, because it affected us personally, for a very long time.

 

[vmro]

If Israel had not been hit hard, they would still be treating Iran the same way they treat Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine, whey bomb wherever they wish whenever they wish for whatever reason. Israelis were in the habit of watching wars on their TV screens, but Iran was able to bring the war to their streets.

They didn't expect that the US president could openly speak about devastating impact on Israelis buildings without declaring war against Iran... they are shocked by unprecedented damage inflicted by Iran...

Losers, after all...

 

[ShapurII]

Then do as you wish. That is why I think it would be wise for China to steer clear of Iran and only apply its influence at the sideline. Definitely not in the middle.

It is your fellow countrymen that are whining like a b*tch on here every day about how Iran has stabbed China in the back, while you clearly admitted that it's been the other way around. We know what has happened and unlike the Chinese, we don't care.

China for us is just a money loving exporter of goods and an energy hungry power. Other than that, nobody in Iran trusts the Chinese even an iota more than the Russians or the Americans and as proven by your own confession, for very good reasons.

 

[Watandar]

Yes I'm aware of all of this, and its mostly true. That doesn't take away from the suffering and legitimate issues we had against his brutal regime for 50 years, and oppression we endured under his rule. Both things can be true at the same time, but we had our own internal grievances that we were fighting against and suffered through, irrespective of the geopolitical games that were going on in the region. That's what mattered most to us, because it affected us personally, for a very long time.

All the best to the people of Syria.

 

[ShapurII]

They didn't expect that the US president could openly speak about devastating impact on Israelis buildings without declaring war against Iran... they are shocked by unprecedented damage inflicted by Iran...

Losers, after all...

The US president is a loud mouth that tries to please everyone to make himself look good and satisfies his ego and grandiosity.

Other than that, you should never believe a single word that comes out of your enemy's mouth.

 

[Lulldapull]

What is the difference between late Soleimani and Jolani?

Soleimani killed jihadist Al-Qaeda bitches like Jolani.

 

[nang2]

It is your fellow countrymen that is whining like a b*tch on here every day about how Iran has stabbed China in the back, while you clearly admitted that it's been the other way around. We know what has happened and unlike the Chinese, we don't care.

China for us is just a money loving exporter of goods and an energy hungry power. Other than that, nobody in Iran trusts the Chinese even an iota more than the Russians or the Americans and as proven by your own confession, for very good reasons.

We don't think backdealing as backstabbing. Usually, backdealing is pre-communicated to the other side so they know the rationale behind it and what compensation may be provided. Backstabbing, on the other hand, is not pre-communicated. It is a sell-out. It is simply to please the West in order to get a deal from them by selling out those that help you behind the West's back. It is worse than direct hostility.

 

[Nuffle]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Statement from the CIA director

Severely damaged... lmfao one government insider says it was destroyed, another government insider says it was obliterated, CIA says it was severely damaged and DIA (military intelligence) leaked report estimates it to be delayed by a few months at most. By the way, SecDef just opened an investigation into who leaked the DIA report, this just shows who is telling the truth.

 

[ShapurII]

We don't think backdealing as backstabbing. Usually, backdealing is pre-communicated to the other side so they know the rationale behind it and what compensation may be provided. Backstabbing, on the other hand, is not pre-communicated. It is a sell-out. It is simply to please the West in order to get a deal from them by selling out those that help you behind the West's back. It is worse than direct hostility.

Probably it's a commie cultural thing, but helping your enemies destroy the economy of a country with friendly relations with you, and weakening its internal security through sanctions, is not called backdealing. It's called betrayal.

 

[nang2]

Probably it's a commie cultural thing, but helping your enemies destroy the economy of a country with friendly relations with you, and weakening its internal security through sanctions, is not called backdealing. It's called betrayal.

It has nothing to do with communism. Don't drag in irrelevant subjects.

 

[Watandar]

We don't think backdealing as backstabbing. Usually, backdealing is pre-communicated to the other side so they know the rationale behind it and what compensation may be provided. Backstabbing, on the other hand, is not pre-communicated. It is a sell-out. It is simply to please the West in order to get a deal from them by selling out those that help you behind the West's back. It is worse than direct hostility.

This "backdealing" term and its meaning are not known outside China. This could have been a cultural misunderstanding all this time.

 

[Cash gk]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies