Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Israeli and American defence systems like Thaad or Arrow are expensive and difficult to built.

What about Iranian ones? Are they also difficult to built? And are they also expansive (compared to ballistic missiles)?
Yes, Bavar did not enter service because of cost. They opted mostly for cheaper but less capable systems.
 
Indians are funny people.
They spent 200 years as British slaves and now they are Zionist slaves .

Being a doormat is in their DNA.

 
Last edited:
It never ends . Arabs used to kill other Arabs . for who?
 


they used to say if snapback is invoked we will leave the NPT

now they say if snapback is invoked then 'Europe will be irrelevant' (whatever that means, like Europe is dying to work with Iran to begin with)

@ShapurII
 


Russians are snakes.

Information coming says Russia(Putin government) never officially asked Iran for zero enrichment, so this is another fake news in the style of 40 Beheaded Babies :

------

An informed source dismissed a report that Russian President Vladimir Putin has called on Iran to agree on a nuclear deal that would exclude uranium enrichment.​

Speaking to Tasnim on Saturday, the informed source said Iran has not received any message from Putin regarding a zero enrichment nuclear deal with the US.

The source emphasized that no such issue has been mooted during the Russian president’s most recent meeting with an Iranian official, namely Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi.

No message regarding zero enrichment has been exchanged via the contact channels between Russia and Iran after that meeting either, the source said.

The comments came after Axios claimed that Putin has told both US President Donald Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the idea of a nuclear deal in which Iran is unable to enrich uranium.

Iranian authorities have described uranium enrichment activities in the country as a red line, stressing that the homegrown capability may never be subject to negotiations or bargained over.

 
The 14 days that Netanyahu said were for regime collapse and total surrender, not a ceasefire.

The goal of their operation was regime collapse and total surrender on day 3 by their calculations, their goal wasn't to degrade anything or destroy the navy/oil fields/launchers and missiles or even the nuclear program, but the main objective was regime collapse after surrendering. There is a reason why the operation was called "Rising Lion" (Lion is the animal that represents Iran)

Their next objective if Iran effectively surrendered was to fund ethnics inside Iran and proceed to the balkanization of Iran after the collapse, then start oil and gas pipelines from Iran to Israel for free and give parts of Iranian land to US/Israel to use them as a forward base to proceed to the next victims. (likely Pakistan)
To proceed with balkanization of Iran first they need the same Balkanian circumstances in Iran, and yes, one or two weeks are enough to have a clear picture if it's possible to get it...

Balkanian countries, as well as some of the ME countries, are their invention, it was easy to crush them with some foreign interventions when those countries were barely able to exist without foreign support...

But the Iranian case is just the opposite of this situation... Iran is not a Western artificial project, and unlike those countries, the Iranian people were united under their national flag in the toughest period of Zionist aggression...

They tried to divide and decimate Iran with the fiercest strikes they could provide, they failed, they were punched with the fiercest toe-to-toe fight they ever had...

And war was stopped at that point, but not in the way they wanted...

And Iran should accept the reality that some ultra-fast modernization of air forces is not realistic... and offensive attacks on the Tel Aviv regime are the best defense for Iran in the eventual next round..


Edit:
@FUB
Now I see that you already have the same points in your post, its just an unintentional coincidence...cheers
 
Last edited:


they used to say if snapback is invoked we will leave the NPT

now they say if snapback is invoked then 'Europe will be irrelevant' (whatever that means, like Europe is dying to work with Iran to begin with)

@ShapurII

If we want to leave NPT, why should we announce it on TV (like 99% of precious big mouth stupidity of Islamic republic). Let them guess later if we're in NPT or not, meanwhile we make our decisions. So Araghchi is right.
 
Information coming says Russia(Putin government) never officially asked Iran for zero enrichment, so this is another fake news in the style of 40 Beheaded Babies :

------

An informed source dismissed a report that Russian President Vladimir Putin has called on Iran to agree on a nuclear deal that would exclude uranium enrichment.​

Speaking to Tasnim on Saturday, the informed source said Iran has not received any message from Putin regarding a zero enrichment nuclear deal with the US.

The source emphasized that no such issue has been mooted during the Russian president’s most recent meeting with an Iranian official, namely Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi.

No message regarding zero enrichment has been exchanged via the contact channels between Russia and Iran after that meeting either, the source said.

The comments came after Axios claimed that Putin has told both US President Donald Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the idea of a nuclear deal in which Iran is unable to enrich uranium.

Iranian authorities have described uranium enrichment activities in the country as a red line, stressing that the homegrown capability may never be subject to negotiations or bargained over.


Well considering that Russia recently made a weird offer to sell Iran Nuclear Fuel, which is strange b/c Iran doesn't need nuclear fuel, it enriches its own. It's more likely that the Axios story is true.

Putin is shady.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top