Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[nang2]

Fact #1: The IR-40 reactor did not need to be redesigned. Iran should've never accepted to redesign an almost complete reactor because of a concern (plutonium production) that could've been resolved through constant IAEA inspections.

Fact #2: China was under no obligation to help us redesign the IR-40 reactor. It was the US who was supposed to that in the JCPOA.

Fact #3: When the US pulled out of the JCPOA in 2018, China offered to redesign the IR-40 reactor to compensate for the US leaving the JCPOA. I don't know if China had issues over the price, but if the price was OK for the US, it should be OK for China as well, obviously.

No, China didn't have issues over the price. Iran had. See the news I quoted earlier. Nevertheless, you can see that China was trying to keep Iran afloat without drowning itself. Yet, in Hack-Hook's eyes, it is all China's fault. WTF?!

 

[Persian Gulf]

Blinken said Iran agreed to discuss limits on its ballistic missiles

not surprising, IRI already neutered itself and imposed a 2000km limit to satisfy the Europeans

 

[ShapurII]

Blinken said Iran agreed to discuss limits on its ballistic missiles

not surprising, IRI already neutered itself and imposed a 2000km limit to satisfy the Europeans

How is less than 1% enrichment even possible? What is it good for?
I mean natural uranium is already about 0.7% enriched lol
Even the worst mined uranium ore in Iran is still +.6% enriched lol

 

[Hack-Hook]

Screw the international norm. The whole situation isn't normal and that is the reality. Nothing could be accomplished if you cannot face the reality.

the reality , you agreed on a price, you failed to deliver what was on the contract .

if you think the original price you asked was fair you must not have agreed on the second price. you agreed but later breached your contract .

 

[nang2]

the reality , you agreed on a price, you failed to deliver what was on the contract .

if you think the original price you asked was fair you must not have agreed on the second price. you agreed but later breached your contract .

Check the news. Iran didn't agree on a price.

 

[Hack-Hook]

No, China didn't have issues over the price. Iran had. See the news I quoted earlier. Nevertheless, you can see that China was trying to keep Iran afloat without drowning itself. Yet, in Hack-Hook's eyes, it is all China's fault. WTF?!

in reality you made a contract and then failed to deliver .
wonder which part is hard to understand

some newer article for you

CNNC signs agreement with Iran on IR-40 retrofit

Iran forges deal with China to redesign Arak reactor

TEHRAN – Iran has hashed out price differences with China to receive counselling on redesigning its only heavy water nuclear reactor, signing a deal on the project with the Chinese side, Iranian Foreign Ministry has said in a written briefing to parliament.

www.tehrantimes.com

 

[Hack-Hook]

Check the news. Iran didn't agree on a price.

Iran and china reached agreement on 23 April 2017
as i said read newer news article

 

[Hack-Hook]

How is less than 1% enrichment even possible? What is it good for?
I mean natural uranium is already about 0.7% enriched lol
Even the worst mined uranium ore in Iran is still +.6% enriched lol

to produce plutonium

 

[nang2]

in reality you made a contract and then failed to deliver .
wonder which part is hard to understand
View attachment 134856
some newer article for you

CNNC signs agreement with Iran on IR-40 retrofit

Iran forges deal with China to redesign Arak reactor

TEHRAN – Iran has hashed out price differences with China to receive counselling on redesigning its only heavy water nuclear reactor, signing a deal on the project with the Chinese side, Iranian Foreign Ministry has said in a written briefing to parliament.

www.tehrantimes.com

Read the contract yourself. It is for counseling only.

 

[ShapurII]

to produce plutonium

What good is that? Iran has already guaranteed in the JCPOA that it will not do plutonium reprocessing indefinitely.

You think they will agree that we stop enriching uranium but start reprocessing plutonium instead? Makes no sense.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Read the contract yourself. It is for counseling only.

and they didn't do that

 

[Hack-Hook]

What good is that? Iran has already guaranteed in the JCPOA that it will not do plutonium reprocessing indefinitely.

You think they will agree that we stop enriching uranium but start reprocessing plutonium instead? Makes no sense.

asked what use that have , i told you what is the use

by the way Blinken is in no position to be privy to what was negotiated between Iran and Europe and its hilarious if Iran offer that to Europe but not to usa

 

[nang2]

and they didn't do that

Check the news you quoted yourself. It was April, 2016. By the time of November, 2016, you have the news complaining the price China gave was too high.

China demanding too much for IR-40 redesign: Iran

TEHRAN – The spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran has said that China has demanded too much money if it is to redesign the Arak heavy water reactor (IR-40), Mehr reported on Wednesday.

www.tehrantimes.com

 

[ShapurII]

asked what use that have , i told you what is the use

No, there is no use for it if you cannot reprocess the waste.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Check the news you quoted yourself. It was April, 2016. By the time of November, 2016, you have the news complaining the price China gave was too high.

China demanding too much for IR-40 redesign: Iran

TEHRAN – The spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran has said that China has demanded too much money if it is to redesign the Arak heavy water reactor (IR-40), Mehr reported on Wednesday.

www.tehrantimes.com

and the deal was signed in 23 April 2017
wonder why you argue for the sake of arguing .
Iran complained about the price in 2016 , Iran and China signed a contract in 2017.
2016 < 2017