Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[nang2]

Ironically the region would be much safer if everyone had nukes.

All nuclear states know that. But they are selfish, too. So they try to fool others with NPT.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

The US will send Ukraine 5 patriot systems.
@Persian Gulf


44% excluding how many missiles were fired at each target individually.
If we want to include that, it will probably drop below 10% but nobody calculates it that way.

there was more than 1 country intercepting them
so, interception rates overly bloated.


col. mcgregor has said many times, 2 interceptor missiles for 1 BM.
all else just lies, you add more countries 50% increases to 88%.
and since BM coming in after interception so even 44% is over hyped, as it would change IR firing behavior!

basic science!

 

[tsunset]

So give us:

140 J-10C (non export version) with PL-15 and guided bombs
104 J-16
50 J-20 with PL-21+PL-17
35 J-35
12 H-6 bombers

+

25 battalions of HQ-9B
8 battalions of HQ-19
17 battalions of HQ-22
20 battalions of HQ-16

 

[nang2]

So give us:

140 J-10C (non export version) with PL-15 and guided bombs
104 J-16
50 J-20 with PL-21+PL-17
35 J-35
12 H-6 bombers

+

25 battalions of HQ-9B
8 battalions of HQ-19
17 battalions of HQ-22
20 battalions of HQ-16

It would be easier that PLA, PLAAF and PLAN station inside Iran, like US does in Japan.

 

[ShapurII]

there was more than 1 country intercepting them
so, interception rates overly bloated.


col. mcgregor has said many times, 2 interceptor missiles for 1 BM.
all else just lies, you add more countries 50% increases to 88%.
and since BM coming in after interception so even 44% is over hyped, as it would change IR firing behavior!

basic science!

It's quite simple.

44% of Iranian missiles were "intercepted".
56% of Iranian missiles went through.

It doesn't matter how many SAMs were fired at each missile, it doesn't matter how many countries participated in the interception. 56% of Iranian missiles went through every layer of IADS that US/NATO/Israel had in the Middle East.

 

[nang2]

It's quite simple.

44% of Iranian missiles were "intercepted".
66% of Iranian missiles went through.

It doesn't matter how many SAMs were fired at each missile, it doesn't matter how many countries participated in the interception. 66% of Iranian missiles went through every layer of IADS that US/NATO/Israel had in the Middle East.

Where do that extra 10% come from? 44 + 66 = 110.

 

[ShapurII]

Where do that extra 10% come from? 44 + 66 = 110.

My poor math skills when I listen to music and type

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

My poor math skills when I listen to music and type

that assumes all interception were done by only the entity..
(which is wrong!)

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

that assumes all interception were done by only the entity..
(which is wrong!)

Indeed if we count all the interceptions by Jordan, US navy, France, UK etc.. I think the interception rate will be 25%

 

[ShapurII]

that assumes all interception were done by only the entity..
(which is wrong!)

It has nothing to do with who attempted to intercept it. It's defined much simpler than that.
%intercepted = #number of missiles shot down / #number of missiles fired.
Obviously, %intercepted + %non-intercepted = 100%.

You can tweak this to come up with a better definition that includes different levels of AD for the overall performance of an IADS, but that's just a different definition.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

It has nothing to do with who attempted to intercept it. It's defined much simpler than that.
%intercepted = #number of missiles shot down / #number of missiles fired.
Obviously, %intercepted + %non-intercepted = 100%.

have you understood all the Alien franchise parts?!

can you tell the difference between molten steel and mercury just by looking at them?

if no, then please think again!

 

[ShapurII]

have you understood all the Alien franchise parts?!

can you tell the difference between molten steel and mercury just by looking at them?

if no, then please think again!

It's a simple definition. Give it another try

 

[Homajon]

Xi Jinping Iran Quote : Fact-Check on Viral "Stood Tall" Statement to FM - PhotoNews Pakistan

A quote attributed to Chinese President Xi Jinping praising Iran's resilience has gone viral on social media, but remains unverified by official sources.

photonews.com.pk

Twitter is really the biggest junk source out there!!!

 

[ShapurII]

Xi Jinping Iran Quote : Fact-Check on Viral "Stood Tall" Statement to FM - PhotoNews Pakistan

A quote attributed to Chinese President Xi Jinping praising Iran's resilience has gone viral on social media, but remains unverified by official sources.

photonews.com.pk

Twitter is really the biggest junk source out there!!!

Blame Elon Musk for monetizing the blue tick.

 

[Homajon]

Blame Elon Musk for monetizing the blue tick.

I blame the people who are constantly active on Twitter and seriously consider it a credible source.