Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I do not know what was destroyed. "Rohani and Zarif are the representatives of Western interests in Iran." I agree. It is well known. Even regime supporters like Ali Alizadeh have called them out.
The problem is that you have personnel with limited education and questionable degrees and doctorates, making decisions for a country that has a large skilled labor force and enormous potential. Jumping with two feet into the US camp is not the answer either. The future is with China. Going to war with world Jewry is very stupid when they have captured one of the world's great powers.
I don't agree about Rohani and Zarif, every country, every party has difference of opinions on how an issue should be handled or approached. Rouhani and Zarif are pragmatists, they're not reactionaries, and yes, they're not the Margh bar Amerika type, this is a good thing, what the fuk have those slogans gotten us in the last 40 yrs, except providing news footage for Western TV to sell the narrative that Iran is an enemy to the whole of the Western world? But, the second part of your post is 100% true, we have people in powerful positions that don't know shit from Shinola, and that needs to be fixed. No more clergy types in powerful positions, let them stay in their lane for spiritual guidance and matters, thank you very much.
 
Scott Ritter was convicted of sexual activities involving an underage child for the first time in 2001 and for a second time in 2009
Yes....you're correct, I looked it up, actually 3 times in total. Shame on him, foolish man. He has 2 daughters, I have no sympathy for these type of people. Unfortunately I've enjoyed his commentary so far, but that's it, I will unfollow him on X.
 


Let us hope this is a sign of positive changes to come.

In my opinion, it's a huge risk to do this. There's a saying in Brazil that goes "TIME QUE ESTÁ GANHANDO NÃO SE MECHE" (It means that if a football team is winning games, the team (tactical system of the football game) and the players should not be changed.). In English, it would be something like "Never change a winning formula" or "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Iran fought Iraq (a US puppet), the CIA, the Mossad, color revolutions, US/Israeli/NATO attacks, terrorist attacks (all without anyone's support). It's a formula that has worked for the past few decades.

I hope I'm wrong, but in my opinion: it's Israel and the US who are behind these "reforms." The goal would be to create a more fragile system, and when there's a future attack or color revolution, the government will fall (this happened in Ukraine in 2013, where the pro-Russian government was infested with NATO agents and fell... then Zelensky took over) and It's also happened in several other places such as Syria: where after the 2017 agreement, there were "reforms," and these reforms created the political system that handed over the government to Israel/NATO in 2025
. If I'm right, the people being singled out as the managers
are themselves the foreign agents.
 
Who lost who won? The way to analyse that is through military objectives of each side. So here’s my analysis:

Israel’s objectives:
1.) dismantle irans nuclear program - partial success

2.) regime change - failed

3.) Drag USA into a war with Iran - failed

Iran’s objectives:
1.) protect the sovereignty of Iran’s territory and airspace - failed
2.) protect Irans nuclear program - partial failure
3.) Avoid war with USA - success.

Iran’s objectives:
1.) protect the sovereignty of Iran’s territory and airspace - failed
2.) protect Irans nuclear program - partial failure
3.) Avoid war with USA - success.
4) Hit Israel very hard after Iran was attacked --- success
5) Force Israel to run to its major backer --- success
6) Force Israel and US request a ceasefire through Qatar --- success
7) Defeat Israeli and Western air defense shield on Israel in just 12 days -- success
8) Iranian intelligence preventing the major infiltration of Mossad agents in Iran - failure
9) Avoid tools (i.e., Whatsup, GPS, etc) that Israel used to harm Iranian scientists and IRGC commanders ---- Failure
10) Defeating the Mossad menace inside Iran ---- partially successful
11) Going nuclear after Iran was unjustly attacked --- Failure
 
Scott Ritter did an hour analysis on the war. He brought the receipts. He called it a draw and a mistake by Iran to accept a ceasefire. He said one more week of missile salvos would have been devastating for Israel. He also said most of the strikes on the TELs were decoys and doctored.


It was not a draw; Iran rebelled the regime change operation, and while its nuclear facilities were damaged and its air defense network failed to detect any Israeli manned fighter intrusion, Iran offset these shortcomings by taking the battle to Israel and hit all Israeli military, nuclear, and critical infrastructure facilities. Iran also forced Israel to request a ceasefire - which itself is an admission of a Israel's defeat.

I also differ Scott Ritter on Iran making a mistake by accepting the ceasefire. Iran needed the ceasefire. You can't wage war on adversary like Israel backed Western powers while you have 1000s of Mossad agents roaming the country, deploying drones, ATGMs, and providing critical intelligence to Israeli drones, and attacking Iranian missile launchers and air defense networks. Iran needed the ceasefire to defeat this terrorist menace.

That being said, the internal security in Iran needs an overhaul. This major failure can't be overlooked.
 
It's obvious that many Iranians want to make a clear distinction between the Iranian nation and the actual government's apparatus in general, regardless of branches...

And the level of presented unity in critical condition is a very important part and rarely seen to be compared...

This is understandable under these circumstances... A grotesque outcome could be if the Prince interprets that circumstances as a call from the Iranian nation to rule the nation in an imperial manner, ruling the nation as the people's last hope...

Practically AIPAC will be in charge via their proxy...
 
It's obvious that many Iranians want to make a clear distinction between the Iranian nation and the actual government's apparatus in general, regardless of branches...

And the level of presented unity in critical condition is a very important part and rarely seen to be compared...

This is understandable under these circumstances... A grotesque outcome could be if the Prince interprets that circumstances as a call from the Iranian nation to rule the nation in an imperial manner, ruling the nation as the people's last hope...

Practically AIPAC will be in charge via their proxy...
The opposition is a joke so are the people supporting them
 
In my opinion, it's a huge risk to do this. There's a saying in Brazil that goes "TIME QUE ESTÁ GANHANDO NÃO SE MECHE" (It means that if a football team is winning games, the team (tactical system of the football game) and the players should not be changed.). In English, it would be something like "Never change a winning formula" or "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Iran fought Iraq (a US puppet), the CIA, the Mossad, color revolutions, US/Israeli/NATO attacks, and terrorist attacks (all without anyone's support). It's a formula that has worked for the past few decades.

I hope I'm wrong, but in my opinion: it's Israel and the US who are behind these "reforms." The goal would be to create a more fragile system, and when there's a future attack or color revolution, the government will fall (this happened in Ukraine in 2013, where the pro-Russian government was infested with NATO agents and fell... then Zelensky took over) and It's also happened in several other places such as Syria: where after the 2017 agreement, there were "reforms," and these reforms created the political system that handed over the government to Israel/NATO in 2025
. If I'm right, the people being singled out as the managers
are themselves the foreign agents.
The situation of the Ukrainian state is incomparable with Iran, incomparable with anything outside of the Soviet Union, an eternally divided state inside and forced on unity from outside... opposite of the Iranian case...

Edit:
If you want to figure out Soviet style, just look states and boundaries of Armenia and Azerbaijan...
 
Last edited:
It's obvious that many Iranians want to make a clear distinction between the Iranian nation and the actual government's apparatus in general, regardless of branches...

And the level of presented unity in critical condition is a very important part and rarely seen to be compared...

This is understandable under these circumstances... A grotesque outcome could be if the Prince interprets that circumstances as a call from the Iranian nation to rule the nation in an imperial manner, ruling the nation as the people's last hope...

Practically AIPAC will be in charge via their proxy...
The only way jewlavi will rule Iran is if there's foreign troops there to keep him in power.
 
Let's take a look at this individual by the name of Mohsen Reyhani. I doubt that such a person exists. On the X profile page, he has a quote by Richard Feynman. A Jewish scientist. You would think an Iranian individual or personality would make a post about an Iranian scientist when we have a long list of them with incredible achievements.

This is Richard Feynman's early life below:
Feynman was born on May 11, 1918, in New York City,to Lucille (née Phillips; 1895–1981), a homemaker, and Melville Arthur Feynman (1890–1946), a sales manager.Feynman's father was born into a Jewish family in Minsk, Russian Empire.and immigrated with his parents to the United States at the age of five. Feynman's mother was born in the United States into a Jewish family. Lucille's father had emigrated from Poland, and her mother also came from a family of Polish immigrants.

On his LinkedIn page, he claims that he is a software programmer and a military analyst in Iran. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mohsen-reyhani-68b475309/?originalSubdomain=ir
There is no way to tie this account to the account on LinkedIn in Iran.

First, there are continuous posts after posts from unknown suspicious accounts on X, all of whom are very biased towards Iran. All of the posts are Israeli talking points. Who are they? Most probably, MK and Israeli accounts, or individuals paid to write biased posts projecting Iranian viewpoints, but the reality is opposite. Anyone who has been to Iran knows the security apparatus would be at his door, knocking.

Second, when you are called out on spreading misinformation, you continue to post misinformation, but mask the identity of the writer of the post.
More on Mohsen Reyhani.

His online presence goes back to 2023 with a few misdirection posts about Russia and Ukraine, and then starts on the IRCG.

He shows up on Telegram, and the channel is filled with pro-Israel posts.
He cannot hold back his glee when posting Israeli victories over Arabs.

There is no reason to mask the identity of such posts. You might as well post from Babak Taghvaee and the IDF. At least Babak does not deny that he gets his shekels. He does not pretend.
There is no reason to mask the Identity of this Zionist tool.

Reyhani's Telegram page is filled with Israeli talking points.
Syrian strike.jpg1967 War.jpg Screen shot.jpg

 
Last edited:
On the X profile page, he has a quote by Richard Feynman. A Jewish scientist. You would think an Iranian individual or personality would make a post about an Iranian scientist when we have a long list of them with incredible achievements.

This is Richard Feynman's early life below:
Feynman was born on May 11, 1918, in New York City,to Lucille (née Phillips; 1895–1981), a homemaker, and Melville Arthur Feynman (1890–1946), a sales manager.Feynman's father was born into a Jewish family in Minsk, Russian Empire.and immigrated with his parents to the United States at the age of five. Feynman's mother was born in the United States into a Jewish family. Lucille's father had emigrated from Poland, and her mother also came from a family of Polish immigrants.
You got to be kidding, right?

Feynman is one of the most popular physics celebrities in the history of science, a Nobel-winning physicist with deep works in quantum mechanics, and you think he should make a post about an Iranian scientist?

Should he quote Fakhrizadeh? lol Who couldn't even build a nuke after 30 years of running some covert program?

The entire Manhattan project took 5 years and they had to do everything from scratch. All they knew was that Otto Hahn had discovered nuclear fission in Germany and it could be used for creating a chain reaction that would lead to an explosion. Its entire budget was $30 billion dollars, adjusted for inflation. They built an entire town for their scientists and their wives and children. Iran spent 10x-50x more than this in a span of more than 3 decades and what do we have to show for it now? We got humiliated in the end. We got our nuclear infrastructure bombed and were proven unable to build shit.

And that Reyhani guy is one of the most knowledgeable Iranian "experts" on Twitter. One of the few people that doesn't write nonsense. He and Neutrino are possibly two of my favorite Iranians on Twitter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top