ShapurII
Trusted Member
You are confusing two different things together.I give up man, if you think Israel even spits without US's permission...then nothing I say can convince you. The entire ops was fronted by the CIA director plant that's an AIPAC appointment...but yeah, you can continue thinking Israel's regime change goal was not shared or approved by Washington. As far as the tweets, it's amazing we can both read the same thing and notice the time line and come away with 2 different takes. So, yeah US was afraid Iran would fail so bad that they wanted to keep the IRI intact, but they just wanted to kill all the heads of military for unrelated cause.
The US greenlighted the Israeli attack on Iran and supported it militarily, but it did not participate in the regime change. There is no evidence that the US participated in or approved of the regime change either politically or militarily.
The arrangement of the US military assets in the Middle East, both then and now, is the best proof for the US unwillingness to participate in regime change. If they wanted to topple the Iranian regime, they would've brought at least 5 aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf and they would've prepared their troops to be deployed in Iran. We're talking about 200K soldiers at least. Israel cannot, and will never be able to deploy 200K soldiers in a foreign country 2,000 km away for invasion. Yet, the US has never done anything in this direction yet.
Your idea that it was oil prices that convinced the US not to go ahead with the plan is not based on anything real that actually happened. Oil prices peaked only $2-$3 above their price before the war. Nobody, not just me, but nobody considers that an oil shock.







