Iranian Air Defence Systems | News and Discussions

[Nuffle]

Look like the talk about detecting and Locking F35 in previous skirmish was a masterful intelligence scenario to give us a sense of relaxation about enemy air power .... and we fell for it.

I didn't fall for that story, I had already warned about it before:

Post in thread 'Discussion: Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran'

Aug 14, 2024

Learn the difference between detecting and targeting.

They are two different things in the radar world.

Some radars can detect at far ranges, but its a general location and cannot be used for target acquisition, but it helps other radars know which sectors/quadrants to scan.

I don't need to learn because I know the difference. Still, detecting fighters at ranges of 900-2,000 km is highly speculative and depends on several factors. It is simply impossible for an OTH radar to detect a LO/VLO fighter flying at medium altitude at a range of 800 km, even if it had an antenna as high...

• Nuffle

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[MS Sandhu]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

@Lulldapull
please have a look at this Lull hamaray

 

[Rational Philosopher]

@Lulldapull
please have a look at this Lull hamaray

Lull saab was just telling us a few weeks ago that Iran is a true superpower while air forces are useless and all Chinese technology is junk. Lull saab can't let go of his pro-Iranian bias for sectarian reasons in favour of objectivity. Shame to see.

 

[MS Sandhu]

Iranians had great SAM designs but looks like they could not mass produce them in enough numbers.

 

[Lulldapull]

Lull saab was just telling us a few weeks ago that Iran is a true superpower while air forces are useless and all Chinese technology is junk. Lull saab can't let go of his pro-Iranian bias for sectarian reasons in favour of objectivity. Shame to see.

What ever I said has been 100% proven true today. China got nothing to fight with and it’s double sad for us.

Irans done great in this war until now.

Now it’s crystal for you two no?

 

[Rational Philosopher]

What ever I said has been 100% proven true today. China got nothing to fight with and it’s double sad for us.

Irans done great in this war until now.

Now it’s crystal for you two no?

In Lull language for you: China is sitting comfortable, no? It's Iran who is getting bombed by Israeli Air Force, no? If China is so weak why is it not being touched? But superpower Iran has got bombed all over the country, no?

Iran has only been able to hit mostly random buildings, Israeli military untouched, crystal clear, no?

 

[Rational Philosopher]

Also let's not have this discussion in the Iranian thread. It's disrespectful. @Lulldapull @MS Sandhu

 

[Rational Philosopher]

Iranians had great SAM designs but looks like they could not mass produce them in enough numbers.

I think their newer missiles which were better quality had less stocks.

Like Fattah-1 & 2, Kheybar Shekan, Khorramshar-4 etc. And because Israeli Air Force was operating in their skies striking launchers, it became difficult to even launch the missiles in numbers. Iran really needed those HGV type penetration missiles & better air defence mechanisms.

 

[Lulldapull]

In Lull language for you: China is sitting comfortable, no? It's Iran who is getting bombed by Israeli Air Force, no? If China is so weak why is it not being touched? But superpower Iran has got bombed all over the country, no?

Iran has only been able to hit mostly random buildings, Israeli military untouched, crystal clear, no?

What Iran hits military/industrial targets in Israel is all censored no?

Good chunk of the targets hit in Iran are civilian no?

Russia gets attacked daily no? Then what is China chickunn no?

Come on no?

Get real no?

 

[Lulldapull]

@Lulldapull
please have a look at this Lull hamaray

Could you prove to us that IDF aircraft regularly penetrate Iranian airspace?

Or is this one of those exceptions rather than the norm?

 

[gambit]

Could you prove to us that IDF aircraft regularly penetrate Iranian airspace?

That is not a proof that anyone capable of doing would want to provide. Why should I prove to you that I can enter your house at any time of the day?

 

[Lulldapull]

That is not a proof that anyone capable of doing would want to provide. Why should I prove to you that I can enter your house at any time of the day?

Yeah but your buddies here Muhammad Saanddhu Singh and Rationalist believe in hair force no?

 

[Psyko70]

I didn't fall for that story, I had already warned about it before:

Post in thread 'Discussion: Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran'

Aug 14, 2024

Learn the difference between detecting and targeting.

They are two different things in the radar world.

Some radars can detect at far ranges, but its a general location and cannot be used for target acquisition, but it helps other radars know which sectors/quadrants to scan.

I don't need to learn because I know the difference. Still, detecting fighters at ranges of 900-2,000 km is highly speculative and depends on several factors. It is simply impossible for an OTH radar to detect a LO/VLO fighter flying at medium altitude at a range of 800 km, even if it had an antenna as high...

• Nuffle

if B2 cant be detected then F35 is impossible. let alone at 1000 km. However, what Iran did was to boost morale. initially when Iran was getting full beating, I remember even here in forum 1st f35 down all were happy.

 

[OldTwilight]

امروز ، رفیقم توی قزوین با چشم جنگنده های اسرائیلی که به سمت تهران می اومدن رو دید و پیام داد که می خواهند تهران رو بزنند ، 11:45 دقیقه هم زدن


زمانی که با چشم جنگنده رو می شه دید ، یعنی توی برد عملیاتی دوش پرتاب های ضد هوایی هست ، ولی دریغ از یکی

جمهوری اسلامی حتی به نیروهاش اعتماد نداره که دوش پرتاب ضد هوایی بهشون بده ...