I have faith Sukhoi to deliver a solid product. They have a long track record in successful designs.
It’s basically a 5th gen F-16. Smaller, stealthy agile multi purpose fighter jet. It’s what we dreamed Kowsar would turn into (or F-313).
I think it will be a success and the best way to position our access to the program is while it’s still in R&D. Russia is not going to have the client list it once did: China has its own planes, India is turning to the west, and any country with strong relations to the west will go with F-35 or F-18/F-15 latest blocks. Even Egypt is being forced into the western arms ecosystem.
That leaves a small list of countries like Algeria, UAE, and Vietnam as potential customers. Iran is the only country that can place a big order (100+ jets).
Personally, I think SU-57 program is shaping up nicely. Of course mainstream media made fun of the “screws” shown at the recent air show in China. What they failed to realize is that was a T-50 model from 2012 and the plane is becoming more and more advanced. For example, the latest block engines now have automated gates to hide components from radar penetration.
Sukhoi patents claim an AVERAGE RCS (all around not just frontal) of .1 - 1 m2 and that puts it in the same territory as F-35 . Disregard the Lockheed propaganda of .001 or whatever since that is one angle in particular X band at a particular altitude/azimuth and they took the MINIMUM value they could record at that. Marketing bs at its finest.
So SU-57!8: A great plane that is improving by each iteration (again what we thought Kowsar would do) with a limited budget of Russia (60B).
Some informational points I think that demonstrate it below:
But how likely is it Russia gives us SU-57? Somewhere between 0 and laughable. Russia has its Arab relations (and Israel) to worry about who would not be happy if Iran got its hands on SU-57.
Shame because I really like the plane and can only imagine how beautiful it would be like in Desert Camo.
I agree with your points. I HOPE (keyword hope) that this recent budget increase translates to more $$$$ to Air Force.
We still don’t know how far along the Iranian “medium” engine project is. If we don’t see any prototype by 2027, I will assume it’s mothballed. I have faith is still going strong, but again finalizing an engine and mass producing it are two different things. Look at China and India in that field.
Yes, we absolutely do need a stop gap airforce. It took China decades in aerospace engineering to reach this point and they have 200B+ military budget and had access to western (and Russia) tech. I don’t know why individuals on here think that Iran can produce “6th gen AI terminators” and completely by pass traditional jet development, when they cannot even reverse engineer an RD-33 or mass produce a J-85.
Also regarding BMs, they are great deterrent weapon, but not a good war weapon. Look at how many KGs of munitions Russia has dropped on Ukraine, or Israel on Gaza/Lebanon. If Iran wanted to replicate that destruction it would need MILLIONS of missiles, not remotely feasible.
So the BM program is good for what it is, keeping enemies at bay from starting a war. But if a major war starts they can't be your only source of firepower.
I have advocated for a high altitude supersonic (Mach 3+) VLO delta wing UAV bomber. U.S. had a recon drone like this in 60’s using an engine from the Blackbird. So it’s not a cutting edge tech beyond Iran’s reach in 2030’s.
The thinking would be a UAV bomber that would be able to be reusable and can penetrate enemy lines to bomb HVTs and complement the BM. I know hypersonic CMs are supposed to be full that role, but again for Iran you get into the same issue of how can you build enough HCMs at a reasonable cost to sustain a war effort?
At the end of the day the lack of a family of engines from CMs to tanks to helicopters to jets is what keeps Iran from reaching a level of a China or Russia in terms of arms development. That and a peanut size military budget of 15B ( hopefully 30-40B in 2025).
As for Kowsar, you already know my viewpoints on it. I thought it would be an experience guide for Iran to learn the steps of mass production of higher magnitude weapon systems. Also a way to modernize the F-5 force for the future plus not rely on an external trainer (ie Yak-130). But it seemed it became more of a zombie program used for press releases and propaganda and given the bare minimum to stay running.
I don’t think at this point anyone in the Republic has a coherent long term strategy for the airforce even the Artesh Navy is still stuck on Mowj vessels since 2008. The Iranian destroyer project (Persian Gulf Ship) is in wonderland apparently after one section of the Hull was shown of years ago.
It wouldn’t surprise me if the consensus in Iran is that:
A) we are too big and too mountainous to be land invaded, thus regime change via military by west is not an option. Color revolutions remain the biggest threat.
B) BMs keep risk of conflict low, if we feel that POINT A is threatened we will just build a nuclear bomb so who needs a fancy airforce and Navy. Focus should be on weapons that cause pain on the enemy, forgo building a military that can wage a long aerial based war.
If those points are true, then the future Iranian airforce will likely look like North Korea’s. Which ironically these days, with NK now under strategic military alliance with Russia you could see a revival of NK airforce in the near future as Russia rebuilds that force to piss off the west and South Korea.
How sad would it be if NK has more advanced airforce then Iran? Even Azeribajian is getting more capable fighter jets than Iran. The future is Iran surrounded by F-35’s from UAE to Israel while we fly the corpse of F-14.
I would call it naivety if someone thinks that Russia will just start providing 5th generation planes to Iran. Just like the United States, EU, or China, the Russians use their defense industry as a tool to project strategic power over client allied states and Iran is a strategic competitor of Russia not some ally as it seems from the outside. its proven by the fact that they never armed Iran in bulk when they could have. If you remember, Rafsanjani wanted to purchase hundreds of 4th generation Mig-29, Mig-31 in 1990-92. How many did Russia give to Iran despite the payments? So if you think that Russia would be providing 5th generation light aircraft to Iran just like that, then that's not going to happen. Although I do not believe this to be happening because of Trump-Admin being sympathetic to Russia, Post-Ukraine war Russia, probably, can be cornered by Iran into a position where they are forced to provide Iran with something meaningful. I mean, there are many possible leverages, even bigger ones than the defense industry. Oil market is one in which Russia and Iran actually compete, Russia will not want to allow Iran to present itself as an alternative if another deal is cut with US in longer terms. Its always the Russians (and Chinese) who gain the most benefit from Iranian-US tension. There is another way that I see more likely to happen. The Iranian military-industrial complex is expanding in all directions. It's getting more battle-hardened now with experience, design teams are getting trained to compete against western foes tech daily. This military-industrial complex has provided Russia with the needed weaponry although not at the level that was expected. So, if Iran can put this military-industrial complex in front of Russia in a strategic partnership deal that in case of further elongated conflicts in the future, instead of relying upon Belorussia or North Korea, Iran can be the one safe industrial backer that Russia will need. Only this way, we can corner Russia into providing us with critical 5th generation TOT. Remember, this is kinda already happening. SU-35S, YAK-130 are reportedly not being purchased with cash, they are being purchased with barter deals. So, my point is already valid. What the Iranian problem is and what most people do not understand is that this is an uncontrolled country. It has no foreign or external involvement for a simple reason. It has no foreign bulk loans so it can't be controlled by superpowers. We, unfortunately, are surrounded in our geography by nations that are controlled from the outside just because of financial inflows. This is one of the reasons that we are not armed by these powers in the name of strategic alliances, which are just strategic tools to control client states. So, believing that 5th generation technology will just come to Iran from Russia will be naivety in my opinion.
Saying that, what I can see happening is that key technologies that actually define manned combat aviation, can be purchased from Russia through TOTs against barter deals. TOT of turbofans is a huge problem, another key tech that I have yet to see in Iran, even though officials have claimed SAIRAN making them, is airborne AESA radars. Iran makes grounds, naval ones but I have yet to see any evidence of airborne AESA. Light LR-BVR is another tech to chase, Iran has achieved heavy LR-BVR Fakour-90 but we need lighter BVR in the generation of Meteor. So, this kind of techs can be obtained from Russia for a local TOT. We can not rely upon these foreign-built airframes because anytime the spare parts supply is cut by the actual producer, the entire CKD assembly line is put to a halt and the fleet is resting in storage or tarmac.
I already posted what I think of the missile program of Iran. It is a very strong deterrent, yes, it is battle-proven now as well against one of the world's strongest foe. Israel is no poor third world nation and IRGACF has punished it twice. But it has only bought us time. Just like building an air force around 4th generation planes or MALE/HALE UCAVs is just gonna buy us time because defense tech is evolving very quickly with AI and changing industrialization techniques. While we will be focusing on 4+ generation planes, our foes like Israel or NATO will be moving towards 5+ and 6th generation in the next 10 years. Think of something in SR-72 class or even more upgraded F-35.
I don't know why you are mentioning J-85 or Kowsar in the same sentence as flankers or 5th generation planes. Current Iranian domestic or indigenous capability is limited to a 4.0 gen light CAP fighter to operate within the IADF. Maybe it can play an e-Warfare and Datalinking role to control the drones or connect with the IADS network. I don't see any other utility considering our large geography which is why I feel they should have already be done with the program to put them in IADS hands and call it a closure. They kept on adding useless modern tech/avionics etc to increase the cost and the program got messed up. We need high KE air-superiority fighters with long ranges, low RCS, high MTOW etc because our battle zones will be beyond the borders of Iran in PG or Iraqi airspace. Nobody (except US) is entering Iran because of strong IADS as proven by the current Israel stunt. I don't agree with your UCAV idea because Iranian attack capabilities are constantly evolving with modern most weaponry. If Iranian missiles can land in Israel, beating Iron Dome, Patriots, David's Sling, Arrow system and whatnot, then what are we worried for currently? We need powerful air superiority manned planes in the category of SU-35S or ideally, SU-57 to deal with enemies outside Iran.
I think the Air Force was neglected initially because of Noujeh Coup. The leadership never trusted the Shahi origin IRIAF. Later on, it became a sacrificial lamb to fund the IRGC missiles, SLVs, AD, UCAVs, navy etc. As iran got involved in wars the arming of proxies stretched the budget even further so what started as a political problem turned into a real management issue over the years. So even when 3rd or 4th generation tech ingredients existed in Iran already such as Turbojets, FBW, PESA, LRBVR, HOBS WVR, e-warfare suits, SOWs etc Iranian aviation industry never received the focus like other branches. The mismanagement and will of the leadership have been the problems. With this ~35 billion USD budget, they can probably fix the mistake they made.