Iranian Chill Thread

[tsunset]

CENTCOM at its finest

 

[tsunset]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

CENTCOM definitely searching for a bunch of land where they can launch tomahawks at with Iran giving them GPS coordinates, same as 2021, never learning anything as always

 

[mangekyo]

This is very interesting. I wonder how the US will retaliate. I think targeting IRGC in Syria would be a weak response considering US is "the world super power." It would show they are vulnerable. An appropriate response from "the world super power" would be drone strikes, air raids or cruise missile strikes at IRGC inside Iran. Anything less and they lose face. It's a humiliation. Such and attack can lead to a huge escalation, but they might feel emboldened after 18. January. If they do, I'd say theres a 50% chance Iran will retaliate proportionally, then there is no stopping this war.

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[tsunset]

The US has 4 options:

- Leave the region
- Stop Israel from continuing its ethnic cleansing in Gaza
- Attack the axis and Iran and start a full war in which they will present themselves as the victims
- Do strikes in Syria-Iraq, and wait for the next batch of drone that will kill random soldiers

 

[Immortals]

This is very interesting. I wonder how the US will retaliate. I think targeting IRGC in Syria would be a weak response considering US is "the world super power." An appropriate response from "the world super power" would be drone strikes, air raids or cruise missile strikes at IRGC inside Iran. Anything less and they lose face. It's a humiliation. Such and attack can lead to a huge escalation, but they might feel emboldened after 18. January. If they do, I'd say theres a 50% chance Iran will retaliate proportionally, then there is no stopping this war.

Why would you strike Iranian soil overtly for an attack that happened on foreign soil [Jordan].

For example, Pakistan struck inside Iran because Iran struck inside Pakistan.

Even Israel has never OVERTLY struck Iranian soil, but instead used clandestine shadow war ops.

It’s a whole another ball game when you strike a country’s soil. It has to respond or else it will open Pandora’s box of becoming the next Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, etc where other countries can strike you and “mow the grass” whenever they want.


While I don’t expect US to bomb a random empty Iranian facility abroad. I expect something significant more severe. Multiple targets over multiple days. But I do not expect Iranian soil to be attacked. If that happens, then **** would hit the fan. I think Pentagon knows the 2nd or 3rd order effects will be unknown of such a move

 

[Mehdipersian]

The US has 4 options:

- Leave the region
- Stop Israel from continuing its ethnic cleansing in Gaza
- Attack the axis and Iran and start a full war in which they will present themselves as the victims
- Do strikes in Syria-Iraq, and wait for the next batch of drone that will kill random soldiers

Americans think they can commit crimes and support the criminal, but they don't see any response!

 

[Immortals]

There will be no attack on Iran itself with Democrats in power.

Mullahs are lucky there is a sleepy person in the White house

Trump and his War hawk cabinet never struck inside Iran either.

Ironically the last president to land troops on Iranian soil was Jimmy Carter (a Democrat), with Reagon being the last US President to strike Iranian military assets (non IRGC) during Operation prey mantis.

Everything since then has been a shadow war leading up to the Solemani strike.

 

[mangekyo]

Why would you strike Iranian soil overtly for an attack that happened on foreign soil [Jordan].

For example, Pakistan struck inside Iran because Iran struck inside Pakistan.

Even Israel has never OVERTLY struck Iranian soil, but instead used clandestine shadow war ops.

It’s a whole another ball game when you strike a country’s soil. It has to respond or else it will open Pandora’s box of becoming the next Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, etc where other countries can strike you and “mow the grass” whenever they want.


While I don’t expect US to bomb a random empty Iranian facility abroad. I expect something significant more severe. Multiple targets over multiple days. But I do not expect Iranian soil to be attacked. If that happens, then **** would hit the fan. I think Pentagon knows the 2nd or 3rd order effects will be unknown of such a move

The way I see it is that Israel and US itself has been targeting Iranian proxy groups almost on a weekly basis for the past decade. From their POV. They are the world super power and just lost 3 soldiers. This time they need to respond in a way a world super power would respond, something that sends a message clearly. Anything less than that means they lose face, become humiliated and risk losing many more soldiers in the future.

Just to be clear, I dont think they will strike inside Iran. I am just saying that not doing it shows great vulnerability.

 

[Mr Iran Eye]

If a frontal war breaks out between Iran and the USA, we will have the opportunity to see for the first time Iran's secret weapons which have never been shown to the public until now

 

[Sarhang]

Trump and his War hawk cabinet never struck inside Iran either.

Ironically the last president to land troops on Iranian soil was Jimmy Carter (a Democrat), with Reagon being the last US President to strike Iranian military assets (non IRGC) during Operation prey mantis.

Everything since then has been a shadow war leading up to the Solemani strike.

Middle East of 2018-2019 was much more quiet than it is now. ''Iranian-backed'' forces were not staging 180+ attacks against US forces. Why would Trump strike inside Iran?

 

[Tehrani021]

The way I see it is that Israel and US itself has been targeting Iranian proxy groups almost on a weekly basis for the past decade. From their POV. They are the world super power and just lost 3 soldiers. This time they need to respond in a way a world super power would respond, something that sends a message clearly. Anything less than that means they lose face, become humiliated and risk losing many more soldiers in the future.

Just to be clear, I dont think they will strike inside Iran. I am just saying that not doing it shows great vulnerability.

Whatever it takes to establish balance of power. Yes they're superpowers but that doesn't mean that they are not subject to being checked once in a while.

 

[tsunset]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

10 years??? The man is 71 years, this is literally like a death penalty

 

[tsunset]

Since when has 1 US soldier life = 1 Iranian/Russian/Chinese? Never in the history of Western Imperialism. In the eyes of US, 1 US soldier life is worth 10 Iranians or 20 or 100. But for sure not 1 for 1.

We shall see what happens, all signs point to next 24 hours for the air campaign to start.

And we remove simple messages saying that an American live isn't worth 10000 non-American lives!

Simple logic that westerners can't understand, you massacre people or soldiers, we massacre your people and soldiers, is this advocating for terrorism or simple logic that a 3yr old baby can understand?

 

[Tehrani021]

The way I see it is that Israel and US itself has been targeting Iranian proxy groups almost on a weekly basis for the past decade. From their POV. They are the world super power and just lost 3 soldiers. This time they need to respond in a way a world super power would respond, something that sends a message clearly. Anything less than that means they lose face, become humiliated and risk losing many more soldiers in the future.

Just to be clear, I dont think they will strike inside Iran. I am just saying that not doing it shows great vulnerability.

And therein lies the hypocrisy and double standards of people like you. You were one of the first to cry foul when Iran launched missiles into Pakistan, but now seem to expect Iran to tolerate it if another country attacks Iranian soil. Don't be deluded by what you think you know about Iran, they fought the entire world back in the 80s, on the back of a revolution and worldwide sanctions, and the enemy could hardly take a few KMs of territory off Iran for only a year, as well as most of the war was fought in the enemy territory. Therefore, any attack on Iranian soil by any nation will be met with force and retaliation because, just like we kept hearing from our Pakistani friends, this sets a precedent that Iran is open for attack and will show weakness.