Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

The 'retaliate now!' crew remind me of the lollipop gild representing Munchkin Land:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

yeah strategic patience dudes are at it again, wonder when this strategic patience nonsense stop after assassination of president or supreme leader . maybe you guys even then prescribe it?
 
Nuclear weapons for Iran are useless. If Iran today declared it has nuclear warheads, Iran should go and sell off all its precision ballistic missiles because it could never use them without the assumption that Iran was launching a nuclear strike! Nuclear weapons are not a deterrent for Iran same way they have not been a deterrent against Ukraine for the Russians. People here are very simple minded, they think if Iran had the bomb, no one would mess with Iran. If that was the case, Iran would already have been a nuclear armed state!
nonsense, since 60 and 70 they had nuclear cannon shells . i don't see certain countries stop using them
 
Alright gentlemen, how are we feeling this upcoming weekend?

What's are your feelings or thoughts if any?
 
do I think most jaish al adl members are coming from the Pakistani side of the border and are generally mostly based on that side than on the iranian side? yes

does that mean Pakistan is intentionally funding them or has an interest to do so ? no

is iran also culpable and negligent in ensuring security and order on its side of the border? definitely yes
this time even irib in 2 oclock news admit the terrorists were not iranian
 
The terrorists were reportedly coming from Pakistan
 
Blurred pictures of the attack

Everything about the attack

- Jaysh cadaver interview
View attachment 31139

- Blood splatters of exploded Jaysh vest
View attachment 31140
- Rests of guts and limbs after being attacked by an RPG
View attachment 31141
- The building was a bloody mess
View attachment 31143
May they burn in hell! Sincere condolences to all Iranians.
 
In addition for some decades our country was running Emad - (Amad), Ya Ali and many more projects to test nukes:

Finally I don't want to say we have enough power to eliminate millions of zionists within 8 minutes but we have enough power to defend ourselves and both America and Jew know it.

View attachment 30900
View attachment 30899
View attachment 30902
View attachment 30901
Squadron commander preparing for an attack on Iran: "This is the order of the hour, we were not at a boiling point like this"

The commander of the 119th Squadron "The Bat" referred in an interview with Walla to the operation that the IDF has been preparing for years - damage to Iran's nuclear program. 15 years after the reactor attack in Syria, the commander spoke about the preparations for a similar operation, lessons learned and mental preparation. "We will do as they ask. From us - we are ready"

In a special interview with Walla, he spoke about the reactor attack and what can be learned from it in preparation for a possible attack on Iran. “Before the attack on Syria, we trained at long distances. I personally participated in exercises in the United States and Canada. I was deputy commander of B Squadron and participated in the transfer of F-16 aircraft from Hill base, in the United States, to Israel. This is truly a long-range flight with a lot of features," Sa recalled, "LA. "We had four refuelings. A crazy operation, a very big Air Force operation, a very impressive operation. At the time, there were maybe four air forces in the world that could mount such an operation."

What do you think can be learned from this for an attack far from Israel, like Iran?

"I'm comparing for a moment the 2007 attack and the return of the United States, which is the closest I can imagine. The occupation regime is different, in practice. As a pilot who connects to the machine and becomes part of a The hoist works with everything needed. When you train for complicated and complex things, even if they are short, you break the training into small chunks."

What does the second part of the preparation for the operation in Iran include?

"Build a training program that is intertwined with the army's plan of attack. Some of it is accompanied by models and training, some are famous and others not so much. It could be a flight abroad, training in Cyprus, Europe, targets more close ones that help us to simulate relevant intervals,

"complementary part to the air program being the technical part. Training a lot in aerial refueling, that's what happened last year. The issue of armaments is also a significant part of the story. Today there are more advanced weapons than there were in the past. part is the synchronization of the body's flight and the assembly of the entire puzzle. Last year we were busy each within ourselves and now we have to build the puzzle so that this entire symphony works together."

Do you already know today what your part will be in attacking Iran if they decide to do so? ?

"I can tell you what they're going to ask of me. It's in various stages of maturity, we're at certain levels. We're ready for action even today. There's still room to move forward."

There has been a lot of talk in the media about their level of preparedness for an attack. What is the degree and quality of readiness for Command Day in Iran compared to a year and a half ago?

"It's hundreds of percent higher than it was a year and a half ago. There are still steps to take, but today I know how to get there and execute, and we're ready. It's not comparable, and if necessary, we know how to do it? Unequivocally." As time passes, we will become more ready. We will do whatever they ask of us. If they ask us to come? We will come. Attack is attack.

During his remarks, squadron commander Lt. Col. T. explained that Air Force fighter pilots' friction with the various threats in the immediate vicinity of the first circle, such as Lebanon and Syria, helps them prepare for an attack on Iran. . "There are a lot of things that are in the immediate vicinity, so you have advantages and disadvantages. It allows you to know very intimately the ranks that may have been there and ended up here."
I suggest reading the full article.
 
All this discussion of Iranian and Hezbollah restraint recalls to mind that when India changed the legal status of Kashmir, the Pakistani COAS Gen Bajwa said that we don't have diesel for our Tanks and Imran Khan said in the assembly, should we fight them and everybody said no. Then they decided to protest by standing silently every Friday at noon. 😝

This is really fear and the reality is that they cannot digest losses.
 
Here, I got a few questions for you too:

Why does Pakistan allow anti-Iran terrorists to operate in its area so brazenly and not lift a finger to annihilate them?

Why does Pakistan turn its face away everytime Iran begs Pakistan to cooperate to take them out?

Also, after all of this is considered, why the hell shouldn't Iran launch an attack inside Pakistan unilaterally to take them out?

Why should Iran sit on its hands and allow terrorists from Pakistan to kill its people just because Pakistan government and its supporters might get their feelings hurt?

Please answer my questions as well, truthfully.
Here, I got a few questions for you too:

Why does Iran allow anti-Pakistan terrorists to operate in its area so brazenly and not lift a finger to annihilate them?

Why does Iran turn its face away everytime Pakistan begs Iran to cooperate to take them out?

Also, after all of this is considered, why the hell shouldn't Pakistan launch an attack inside Iran unilaterally to take them out?

Why should Pakistan sit on its hands and allow terrorists from Iran to kill its people just because Iran government and its supporters might get their feelings hurt?

Please answer my questions as well, truthfully.
 
Here, I got a few questions for you too:

Why does Iran allow anti-Pakistan terrorists to operate in its area so brazenly and not lift a finger to annihilate them?

Why does Iran turn its face away everytime Pakistan begs Iran to cooperate to take them out?

Also, after all of this is considered, why the hell shouldn't Pakistan launch an attack inside Iran unilaterally to take them out?

Why should Pakistan sit on its hands and allow terrorists from Iran to kill its people just because Iran government and its supporters might get their feelings hurt?

Please answer my questions as well, truthfully.
1712237024382.png
 
Here, I got a few questions for you too:

Why does Iran allow anti-Pakistan terrorists to operate in its area so brazenly and not lift a finger to annihilate them?

Why does Iran turn its face away everytime Pakistan begs Iran to cooperate to take them out?

Also, after all of this is considered, why the hell shouldn't Pakistan launch an attack inside Iran unilaterally to take them out?

Why should Pakistan sit on its hands and allow terrorists from Iran to kill its people just because Iran government and its supporters might get their feelings hurt?

Please answer my questions as well, truthfully.

So you purposefully didn't answer my questions and resorted to low level trolling.

Iran doesn't have anti-Pakistan terrorists to the extent Pakistan has anti-Iranian terrorists, and Iran doesn't turn a blind eye to them generally. However in recent times Iran has been forced to reciprocate Pakistani inaction. Remember it was Pakistan based terrorists who were first on the scene, killed more and are stronger. The ball was always in your court.

Pakistan has never begged Iran for anything especially cooperation, so that's a lie.

The reason why Pakistan hasnt attacked Iranian Balochistan is because they have their hands full on their own side of the border and they may just be okay with terrorists operating inside Iran.

Now come on, don't be a retard and a coward and answer my questions which I posed to you first.
 
Major GPS jamming taking place in Israel to prevent Iran and axis precision attacks

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If they had responded earlier, we would never even have discussed a possible war scenario in the first place. You think Israel would have the balls to bomb our consulate if we had responded to IRGC bombings in Syria? Do you think they would have the balls to do anything to us in Syria if we had responded to the assassinations?

If we continue with this cowardice, what's stopping them from bombing our nuclear facilities?

Yes we would be in a much worse situation! Israel would have escalated without mercy and we would be in a regional war. Now I'm not against war against evil, but if the public arent on the side of the government and would behave treacherously/cowardly in an escalation with Israel, thus causing the potential downfall of IR, we would then have to take it back to those events which you called for retaliation and ask "was it worth it?".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top