Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

“based on 1960’s missile” is very misleading. I could also say Abrams is based on Payton’s tank from WW2 and it would technically be true.

It’s a highly upgraded SM-2 which is used in US Navy to this day. It’s simaritlies end with the 1960 version as the entire inner components (engine, seeker, analog to digital, etc) has been changed.
Sayyad-2 is based on SM-1 not SM-2. SM-1 was produced from 1967.
 
And contrary as what @HackHook says, F-16i dates from at least 30 years old, as same as the F-15s, and are not "freshly coming from the manufacture", and overloaded with electronic, jamming pods
F-16d can be block 25 can be block 52+ ,Israel f-16i Sufa is based on f16d but its based on block 52+ not block 25 the delivery started in 2004 and finished in 2006, so its based on 16 year old platform not 30 year platform.
just saying.
 
based on what? Why is there so much chatter within Israel that it wont win this war if Palestinians are actually losing like you suggest?

You want Gaza to win the war and so does Iran, but do you know the difference between you and Iran in this situation? expectations of time frame for a Gaza victory- you seem to have expected Gaza to have won already, and Iran most likely knows it will take some more time for Israel to actually get exhausted , lose or give up in this war. Gaza militants planned for a long war with Israel and their statements and actions are in coordinated unison on that plan.
The Israelis are now targeting Rafah, which is the last southern part of Gaza and if the people are pushed out of there then there will be fighters only inside isolated places inside Gaza. Their plan of driving out the Palestinians will succeed and US has already developed the temporary port which will play a part in taking over the oil and gas in the sea. So their plans seem to be succeeding at a slow pace due to the resistance of Hamas.
 
The Israelis are now targeting Rafah, which is the last southern part of Gaza and if the people are pushed out of there then there will be fighters only inside isolated places inside Gaza. Their plan of driving out the Palestinians will succeed and US has already developed the temporary port which will play a part in taking over the oil and gas in the sea. So their plans seem to be succeeding at a slow pace due to the resistance of Hamas.
Zionia is being slaughtered in northern Gaza. You’re not aware of the tactical situation. Your posts are without value.

Zionia lost.
 
The Israelis are now targeting Rafah, which is the last southern part of Gaza and if the people are pushed out of there then there will be fighters only inside isolated places inside Gaza. Their plan of driving out the Palestinians will succeed and US has already developed the temporary port which will play a part in taking over the oil and gas in the sea. So their plans seem to be succeeding at a slow pace due to the resistance of Hamas.
Let me be clear;

1º.- International community won´t accept palestinians leave Gaza. No more expelled from Palestina. Maybe western government can close eyes, but if any Nakba 2.0 is a military objective, many western countries will take the streets.

2º.- That port it is just a floating platform. If you want to build a port for embarking gas or oil you need millions and years of works for being done. Just in the insight of HZ and their drones, to tell it mildly.

3º.- Netanyahu it is in the Edge. Probably that guy cannot get out of the country without being arrested and time it is against him. But inside the frontier, Benny Gantz is telling him that the coalition of cobras and scorpions are no more supportive. Days are running off his hands
 
Another pretty good analysis by Johnny Harris on how The Resistance has Zionia on the ropes and helping Hamas. This guy’s video has ~700000 views. His take is based on the advent and history of Ansarullah.

Anyone who is interested in the current STRATEGIC sitrep (instead of cherry-picking minutiae) should understand the obvious things said here.

Humongous influencer:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I suspect that Aliyev may be bipolar
 
you are on crack if you think Hezbollah can purchase 0.1m resolution satellite imagery of a military site inside Israel from multiple angles

They just did and it’s more like 30CM resolution than 10cm.

It’s clear it’s satellite photos and not drone footage or standard Google Earth. I mean you can also locate the same site on Google Earth.

And Hezbollah like Iran has countless front companies and individuals.

Stop being stubborn and admit when your wrong.
 
They just did and it’s more like 30CM resolution than 10cm.

It’s clear it’s satellite photos and not drone footage or standard Google Earth. I mean you can also locate the same site on Google Earth.

And Hezbollah like Iran has countless front companies and individuals.

Stop being stubborn and admit when your wrong.
from multiple angles? of an israeli military base in the Golan? that's not logical
 
from multiple angles? of an israeli military base in the Golan? that's not logical

That’s what LEO satellites provide when they pass low pass photos. And most of the “angles” is just photoshop editing the orientation of the image with a “3D effect” overlay.

There’s little to no laws that prevent you from obtaining imagery of military targets/government buildings. There’s articles about this. Very few buildings are censored and most are actually in Turkey and Europe, not in Middle East. And they are government buildings not military ones.

The reason for lack of restrictions is simple: China and Russia don’t need to use commercial imagery. Or even counter intelligence countries within the EU/NATO.


 
That’s what LEO satellites provide when they pass low pass photos. And most of the “angles” is just photoshop editing the orientation of the image with a “3D effect” overlay.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Hezbollah themselves claimed it was their reconnaissance from a drone ...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Hezbollah themselves claimed it was their reconnaissance from a drone ...


What HZ drone can take that spatial resolution shot?

It’s clearly a satellite

Here is 20 cm

1716139479746.png

Here is 15 cm
1716139552944.jpeg

The fact you think a low flying drone can capture that much detailed imagery and relay it back crystal clear with no Sat com is baffling.

In comparison, this is DARPA’s 1.8 giga pixel camera for the predator drone

1716139803398.jpeg


But sure, Hezbollah and it’s Ababil’s can beat this no problem
 
What HZ drone can take that spatial resolution shot?

It’s clearly a satellite

Here is 20 cm

View attachment 41910

Here is 15 cm
View attachment 41911

The fact you think a low flying drone can capture that much detailed imagery and relay it back crystal clear with no Sat com is baffling.

In comparison, this is DARPA’s 1.8 giga pixel camera for the predator drone

View attachment 41912


But sure, Hezbollah and it’s Ababil’s can beat this no problem
But sure, Hezbollah and it’s Ababil’s can beat this no problem
But what is the original question? How Hezbollah does its FLIR/view of the positions before the videos?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top