Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Warning: source is Zionist

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


However, flight tracking data seems to support it.
Click to expand...

Fukk Israel. Launch TP3 and kill the Israelis. Destroy their Air Force. Eliminate the US Air Bases in the region.

God I hate them so much so I don't care if I myself die in the Nuclear Winter 5 years later, so can't we Muslims unite to annihilate those Infidel Zionist and AmeriKKKan scum?
 
StrategicBear said:
Fukk Israel. Launch TP3 and kill the Israelis. Destroy their Air Force. Eliminate the US Air Bases in the region.

God I hate them so much so I don't care if I myself die in the Nuclear Winter 5 years later, so can't we Muslims unite to annihilate those Infidel Zionist and AmeriKKKan scum?
Click to expand...

The bombing in Haifa and missile of Yemen was the response apparently
 
strateger said:
Loans..... economic market access... something. With all the enemies surrounding it, Syria can't stand forever without a well equipped military. Soldiers loyal to Syria may not continue to fight without being well-equipped.

24 Kowsars... 240 million.. 250 karrar tanks, 250 million... 50 shahed-129's.. 50 million. Half a billion USD. They can afford that on a long-term loan.

Of course... that's a huge order for Iran to fulfill as well. Maybe not the 24 Kowsars or Shaheds, but that is a huge tank production order. Iran could easily deliver the Kowsar and Shahed order though.
Click to expand...
The Syrian army does not use the equipment they have well. Heavy equipment is not needed to attack these terrorists.

Also, the Kausar fighter jet is not mass-produced in Iran, and it is a technology proof plan .
 
Mehdipersian said:
The Syrian army does not use the equipment they have well. Heavy equipment is not needed to attack these terrorists.

Also, the Kausar fighter jet is not mass-produced in Iran, and it is a technology proof plan .
Click to expand...

Given what I’ve observed of the region, even if Assad had the money to buy weapons, was he willing to trust all his forces enough to arm all of them?

Also, no army can function without rigorous and continuous training, a proper organisation.

That said, it should be clear to one and all that the performance of the SAA shows that Assad is at fault for not consolidating in the the years of relative peace.
 
Shawnee said:
If you attack first, you have huge advantage.
Click to expand...

This is not true at all, it is taught in military academy that the defender has the advantage hence why the attacker should
Attack with at least a 3x to 4x manpower advantage to negate this.

The defender is entrenched and hidden where as the attacker has to attack and expose himself in the open leading to casualties against an entrenched defender force.

In case of SAA they were (it appears) simply not entrenched. No defensive lines. No set up to slow an invading force. And no rear guard.

It appears quite simply there was no mobilization done and this was the equivalent of an enemy army storming across a normal border during peacetime with minor checkpoints (at best).
 
Immortals said:
This is not true at all, it is taught in military academy that the defender has the advantage hence why the attacker should
Attack with at least a 3x to 4x manpower advantage to negate this.

The defender is entrenched and hidden where as the attacker has to attack and expose himself in the open leading to casualties against an entrenched defender force.

In case of SAA they were (it appears) simply not entrenched. No defensive lines. No set up to slow an invading force. And no rear guard.

It appears quite simply there was no mobilization done and this was the equivalent of an enemy army storming across a normal border during peacetime with minor checkpoints (at best).
Click to expand...

Attacker chooses the timing and element of surprise.

Trench matters less

2x and 3x the defense line is correct
ISIS had far less than 2X Iraqi army. But element of surprise and motivation wins at least transiently
 
Shawnee said:
Attacker chooses the timing and element of surprise.

Trench matters less

2x and 3x the defense line is correct
ISIS had far less than 2X Iraqi army. But element of surprise and motivation wins at least transiently
Click to expand...

There is no element of surprise if the defender does its job and prepares which in both cases SAA and Iraq did not.

Prior to Russia invading Ukraine, Russian troops were amassing along the border with supplies and encampments, over 100K+ soldiers. Ukraine did nothing to defend itself from an invasion, hence why the initial Russian gains were so rapid, there were no defensive lines set up at the border. Then Ukraine did mass mobilization and actually started attacking stretched Russian convoys and troops. Rest is history.

The reason why this war now takes so long (besides western aid) is that Ukraine had much more manpower to draw from by doing a mass mobilization of all men from 16-75. But once again we saw with the formidable Russian defensive lines the infamous Ukraine summer offensive failed miserably last year.

In your example of ISIS, again is poor example since just like SAA today, Iraqi army largely fled every major battle including Mosul, until it reached Baghdad where once again a Mobilization was decreed by Ayatollah Sistanti and rest is history.

So your examples (SAA and ISIS) are both examples of militaries running away and not fighting. Not a real “battle” by any means.

Look at Iran vs Iraq, when Saddam couldn't even beat a bunch of farmers and civilian militias at Kermanshah as a better example of a defending force that was suprised but held their ground till back up arrived. Especially when Saddam claimed he would be in Tehran in a week due to the chaos of the revolution.
 
If the Syrian government falls it would be a disaster for Hizbollah, their supply line and ally will be finished, the HTS and rest of wahabi terrorists will attack Hizbollah in Lebanon from Syria, Israel from one side and wahabis from the other side. This looks like the plan, Israel is very serious, it wants to finish off any legitimise resistance. Bashar Al Assad has been fighting off terrorists for a decade but failed to defeat them or take back his nation territory, this new attack is surprising, we all thought SAA is battle hardered army, has been resupplied with weapnary but nothing.
Syria is no more unfortunately, Kurds are separate and now Turkey wants a piece, soon Israel want some too.
 
PakAl said:
If the Syrian government falls it would be a disaster for Hizbollah, their supply line and ally will be finished, the HTS and rest of wahabi terrorists will attack Hizbollah in Lebanon from Syria, Israel from one side and wahabis from the other side. This looks like the plan, Israel is very serious, it wants to finish off any legitimise resistance. Bashar Al Assad has been fighting off terrorists for a decade but failed to defeat them or take back his nation territory, this new attack is surprising, we all thought SAA is battle hardered army, has been resupplied with weapnary but nothing.
Syria is no more unfortunately, Kurds are separate and now Turkey wants a piece, soon Israel want some too.
Click to expand...

Situation is way more solid than it may appear recently.
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Light troops. No tanks, no Air support.
Those IRGC Su22 with gliding bombs are ideal for supporting this counteroffensive right now. Remember Iran had gliding bombs, much before Russia developed their own kits to hit ukranian position from safe distance.
Al Nusra terrorist have been poured with probably tens MANPADS so glider bombs with guidance kits are mandatory in CAS missions.
May God help them to crush terrorists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 21 (members: 0, guests: 21)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top