Does IRGC realize how big of a strategic loss losing Syria would be? To the absolute gain of Zionia and their buddy Turkiye.
Let me tell you a story. I have been following this conflict since it’s origination at a CIA color revolution in the Arab Spring, that is 2010-2011.
One time years later I was watching a video on an IRGC general giving an interview. It was not a flashy video nor probably many saw it. He was speaking and he said something quite remarkable. He said back when Damascus was about to fall, when all hope was lost there was a great debate not in Iranian leadership, but the IRGC itself about intervening!
Many of his colleagues he said thought it was a “lost cause” and it was better to negotiate a solution with the playmakers to secure Iran’s interest. He said many didn’t believe they could save Assad. It had never been done before (they were right). He said thankfully those elements didn’t win out within the organization and that leadership sided with those who called for intervention.
Now I ask you, in 2024, are those anti interventionist elements still in IRGC? Of course! And what about the elements that said they must intervene? …..They are dead. Many died in Syria in the last decade to Israeli strikes and the chief architect (Solemani, died in 2020).
The IRGC is now survived by Generals who sit in Tehran and live off nepotism like General Salami, General Bagheri, and the rest. These generals no longer have revolutionary zeal, they are men of talk, not men of war. They live off the fruits of their fallen brothers. And much like Qajar dynasty they will rapidly squander what previous gains their brothers got them.
The IRGC today is not the IRGC of 2010 nor the IRGC of 1985. They are now a quasi economic-political-military institution that has a huge
Interests in self preservation and making money busting sanctions.
Without a decree of Ali Khamenai to come into Syria, I suspect their are political maneuvering being done for a post Assad Syria already once again.