Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

Iran finds itself encircled by strategic corridors designed to bypass its borders

(...)

Yet TRIPP represents merely one strand in a broader tapestry of isolation. To Iran's east, the Lapis Lazuli corridor seeks to connect Pakistan and Afghanistan to Turkmenistan, deliberately bypassing the shorter, more cost-effective route through Iranian territory. In the south, the proposed IMEC corridor would link India to the Mediterranean via the Persian Gulf's southern shores, rendering Iran's strategic position irrelevant. Meanwhile, the Development Road in the west aims to channel Gulf trade through Iraq to Turkey, paralleling but excluding Iran's established north-south transit route with Russia.

(...)

This systematic encirclement reveals a troubling pattern. Each corridor requires longer routes, higher costs, and complex multimodal transport arrangements - sacrifices apparently deemed worthwhile to achieve one primary objective: Iran's exclusion from international trade networks. As one US official candidly explained, the idea is to "unlock the region through commercial means" whilst creating economic interests that inherently marginalise Iranian participation.
(...)
Iran's concerns extend beyond immediate economic impacts. Should these corridors materialise as envisioned, the country risks becoming economically invisible - present on maps but absent from vital international trade arteries. Such isolation would render Iran increasingly vulnerable to sanctions and external pressure whilst diminishing its role as a regional power....

Read the article. It precisely describes how Iran is being 'suffocated geographically'. However, the author fails to recognize that Iran is definitely one of the least trustworthy trade partners in the entire MENA region. Every trade agreement with Türkiye has been violated by the Iranians at some point. Whenever the interests of someone within the ranks of the regime were affected, trade deals were abruptly canceled, even if the average Iranian was benefiting from them, e.g. preferential trade agreement between Ankara and Tehran. Don't overlook these facts when criticising your neighbours. Right now Iran is being marginalised and excluded from regional and global trade. This needs to change.
I tell you one thing, Iran excels at this kind of operations......let them come and take over the corridor, Iran will do to them what they did in Iraq. Now, this is the kind of resistance I approve.
 
Iran shoud just finish up the corridor stretching from Turkmenistan to Turkey, crossing INSTC, bypassing Caspian multimodal transit route. It will be faster and cheaper and doesnt need to pass multiple countries.

There is a lot of potential for the East-West, North-South routes. If Iran manages it well, it can benefit a lot and it will beneift the integration of the whole region.

The immense hate by entire west, NATO and their lackeys towards Iran is because of Irans potential, Israel and Nuclear program are just excuses which they use to attack.

Iran, Turkmenistan agree to build 2 new rail lines at Sarakhs border.

You are assuming current leadership of IRI has a "vision" for Iran. You do realise this is the same government that is sitting on worlds second largest hydrocarbon reserve yet refuses to invest or get investment for building infrastructure for it?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Former president joins growing push for overhaul of Iran's rule

political establishment for a fundamental change of course, with former president Hassan Rouhani joining a growing chorus warning that continued rigidity could lead to paralysis or trigger renewed unrest.

The convergence — from reformist academics to former officials close to the Supreme Leader — points to an unusual degree of agreement that the status quo, especially after the June war with Israel, is unsustainable.

“There is no way to save the country except for all of us to become servants of the people — to recognize that sovereignty belongs to the people,” moderate outlet Entekhab quoted Rouhani as saying on Thursday. “The Iranian nation owns Iran.”

Rouhani also urged an overhaul of media regulations to allow private broadcasters alongside the state’s. “We should have 10, 20, 30 channels that are private, owned by the people,” he said. “If we want the people to be with us, this is the way.”

‘Obligation to negotiate’

Rouhani’s remarks come amid a season of acute pressures — a setback in the June conflict with Israel, an economy battered by sanctions and mismanagement, and rolling water and electricity outages in a sweltering summer that have pushed many Iranians to the edge.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has in recent weeks all but raised his hands in defeat, implying that real power lies elsewhere when it comes to key policies such as relations with the United States.

Rouhani picked up where Pezeshkian left off.

“If we can improve relations with Europe, our neighbors, and both East and West—even reduce tensions with the United States—and it serves our interests, then why not?” he said.

“Not only is there nothing wrong with it, it is our duty and obligation.”

‘Iran in ruins’

Prominent sociologist Taqi Azad Armaki went further, calling for an ideological shift toward a normal state.

“The government has only two options: change its outdated approaches or face a deadlock,” he said on Wednesday. “Iran must embrace global norms to overcome its political, economic, and cultural challenges and improve its international image.”

But the most scathing take came from former MP Parvaneh Salahshoouri, who appeared to address Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei directly.

“With its ‘Islamic Ummah’ doctrine, the Islamic Republic built neither an ummah nor preserved the Iranian nation,” she posted on X, citing the Arabic word for religious community—central to the thinking and behavior of Iran’s theocratic rule.

“What remains is a ruined Iran, and from the Islamic Ummah, only curses and hatred toward it,” she added, leaving little doubt as to whom she blamed with direct references to Khamenei’s catchphrases.

“(The Islamic Republic) squandered ‘dignity and wisdom’ with the ‘no war, no negotiations’ stance — and yet there was both war and negotiations — and now it is even struggling to preserve Iran itself.”
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Houthi leaders have proven to be much better protected and harder to reach than any Iranian official

Israel failed again to assassinate key Houthi leaders today

notably when the US assassinated Soleimani and Muhandis in Iraq, they tried to assassinate a senior IRGC-QF official in Yemen simultaneously but that attempt also failed.
 
Houthi leaders have proven to be much better protected and harder to reach than any Iranian official

Israel failed again to assassinate key Houthi leaders today
You may not understand how this works, but I'll explain: in addition to creating blackops terrorist groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, the CIA and MOSSAD plant explosives (through spies and terrorists created by them) in various locations around the world.

When they start the war (using any pretext or false flag operation) the bunkers and public buildings used for meetings (of their enemies) already have explosives planted by spies (years before).They let them gather in these places for years without detonating the explosives, because if they did, it would create an internal alarm that something was planted. They save the explosion for the time of war and for the moment when the place (previously planted with explosives) will be full of officers gathered to make war decisions against them. This is how some party and group leaders in Lebanon and Iran died, as well as nuclear scientists.

After the explosion, a plane or drone drops explosives from above to HIDE THE REAL REASON FOR THE ATTACK and confuse everyone. If they can't launch a plane or drone, they'll crash some object at high speed into that location and say it was this impact that destroyed the target...

This is why they can't (easily) kill certain people in Yemen or Afghanistan. These are very closed countries, also difficult to access, with "swampy terrain," deserts, and highly complex caves. Bombing alone (with any technology) can't destroy bunkers hide bellow earth.

NOTE: This is why Iran's nuclear project continues to exist, because bombing alone can't destroy them. They tried to plant explosives in the lowlands where the entire nuclear project is located, but they failed.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Houthi leaders have proven to be much better protected and harder to reach than any Iranian official

Israel failed again to assassinate key Houthi leaders today

notably when the US assassinated Soleimani and Muhandis in Iraq, they tried to assassinate a senior IRGC-QF official in Yemen simultaneously but that attempt also failed.

They don't have the crawling opposition that Irán has.

Anyway killing some generals of IRGC and scientists is not that bad. IRI and Sepah won't fail again. Their butt are the next. That is like Stuxnet virus. You can use just one time that weapon. Next time IRI will close that window.
 
They don't have the crawling opposition that Irán has.

Anyway killing some generals of IRGC and scientists is not that bad. IRI and Sepah won't fail again. Their butt are the next. That is like Stuxnet virus. You can use just one time that weapon. Next time IRI will close that window.
they have been killing Iranian nuclear scientists for 13 years so far and killed 15 of the most important scientists within minutes at once

the trajectory doesn't seem to be positive
 
Former president joins growing push for overhaul of Iran's rule

political establishment for a fundamental change of course, with former president Hassan Rouhani joining a growing chorus warning that continued rigidity could lead to paralysis or trigger renewed unrest.

The convergence — from reformist academics to former officials close to the Supreme Leader — points to an unusual degree of agreement that the status quo, especially after the June war with Israel, is unsustainable.

“There is no way to save the country except for all of us to become servants of the people — to recognize that sovereignty belongs to the people,” moderate outlet Entekhab quoted Rouhani as saying on Thursday. “The Iranian nation owns Iran.”

Rouhani also urged an overhaul of media regulations to allow private broadcasters alongside the state’s. “We should have 10, 20, 30 channels that are private, owned by the people,” he said. “If we want the people to be with us, this is the way.”

‘Obligation to negotiate’

Rouhani’s remarks come amid a season of acute pressures — a setback in the June conflict with Israel, an economy battered by sanctions and mismanagement, and rolling water and electricity outages in a sweltering summer that have pushed many Iranians to the edge.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has in recent weeks all but raised his hands in defeat, implying that real power lies elsewhere when it comes to key policies such as relations with the United States.

Rouhani picked up where Pezeshkian left off.

“If we can improve relations with Europe, our neighbors, and both East and West—even reduce tensions with the United States—and it serves our interests, then why not?” he said.

“Not only is there nothing wrong with it, it is our duty and obligation.”

‘Iran in ruins’

Prominent sociologist Taqi Azad Armaki went further, calling for an ideological shift toward a normal state.

“The government has only two options: change its outdated approaches or face a deadlock,” he said on Wednesday. “Iran must embrace global norms to overcome its political, economic, and cultural challenges and improve its international image.”

But the most scathing take came from former MP Parvaneh Salahshoouri, who appeared to address Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei directly.

“With its ‘Islamic Ummah’ doctrine, the Islamic Republic built neither an ummah nor preserved the Iranian nation,” she posted on X, citing the Arabic word for religious community—central to the thinking and behavior of Iran’s theocratic rule.

“What remains is a ruined Iran, and from the Islamic Ummah, only curses and hatred toward it,” she added, leaving little doubt as to whom she blamed with direct references to Khamenei’s catchphrases.

“(The Islamic Republic) squandered ‘dignity and wisdom’ with the ‘no war, no negotiations’ stance — and yet there was both war and negotiations — and now it is even struggling to preserve Iran itself.”
They're finally waking up. Welcome brothers/sisters.....we've been saying these things for over a decade. We need overhaul in the who set up of government....people should be able to elect who they want, then those leaders should run policy.....full stop!
 
What has the resistance done for Iran? Numerate them.....I'll wait.

In the mean time....I'll numerate a few for you
Who trained and armed Hezbollah to repel Israel when they invaded your country in 2006? Hint, it wasn't the fuking Gulfies.
How much money have we directly given you for your civilians....Hint: Billions!
Who helped rally the forces in the region to rescue your lot from ISIS....same question goes for Iraq and Syria......Do you need a hint?
How much money have we given to Hamas to rebuild houses and roads, schools, hospitals every time Israel destroyed them. Hint: Billions!
How many Afghan refugees came to Iran after the failed US pullout....and even before when the Taliban were in charge the first time? Over 10 million!!!!!! Yes...10 million refugees that were taken in, clothed, fed and schooled.

Listen up, if you come in here bad mouthing Iranians in the Iranian thread...bring receipts....or el

Literally, everything they have militarily has been funded by us after the revolution. We have helped them so much that we can literally claim South Lebanon is ours.
Without Iran, Shiite and Sunni resistance groups would've been throwing stones at Israel.

Christian Lebanese might be given some AK-47s to kill Muslim Arabs, and receive some military support as we see in Syria at the moment, but Muslim Arabs without Iran will have to fight with stones and slingshot. Well, good luck to them.
And we helped the Iranian revolutionaries before 1979,
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
they have been killing Iranian nuclear scientists for 13 years so far and killed 15 of the most important scientists within minutes at once

the trajectory doesn't seem to be positive

The nuclear program iran is on life support.

There is no desire to rebuild Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan, etc. and even if the desire was there what was is the point? They cannot defend these sites.

And with what will they build? These sites cost hundreds if not billions of dollars to build. Iran is poorer and poorer each year.

Israel/USA didn’t try to eliminate the Nuclear Program from the air, they just aimed to make it so costly and time consuming to repair that Iran will see no logical reason to rebuild. Killing scientists/engineers also plays a part in the rebuild process.

This is what they did to Assad and Saddam bombed both their programs (much smaller) and both decided it wasn’t worth the headache and costs to rebuild. Assad was covertly building a plutonium reactor in Dier ez Zor allegedly with NK help before it was bombed prior to coming online (pre CIA revolution).

Iran doesn’t really have any cards left to play. How is selling out to China any different to selling out to US? Iran toppled the Shah to eventually go from a U.S. client state to a Chinese one?

Iran is looking wildly incompetent these days. As if they had no plan in place if US/Israel would attack.
 
Iran doesn’t really have any cards left to play. How is selling out to China any different to selling out to US? Iran toppled the Shah to eventually go from a U.S. client state to a Chinese one?
You uncritically consume too much American propaganda. Name a Chinese client state? And yes, even if China had client states, being one would be obviously be better than being a US client state. Would you rather have world class infrastructure and tech or eternal debt to a jewish bank for basic healthcare and education? Or perhaps being like Argentina sounds preferable to you?
 
Last edited:
You uncritically consume too much American propaganda. And yes, even if China had client states, being one would be obviously be better than being a US client state.

American propaganda? Look around, you don’t need American propaganda to tell you the reality on the ground. B-2’s flew into Iran and incapacitated billion dollar nuclear installations and the only thing Iran did was fire a few missiles at US base. EU + US can trigger SnapBack of UN Sanctions and Russia/China cannot use veto to stop it.

There is no indication China wants a strategic relationship with Iran. China has good relations with Israel and the Arabs. They offered Iran 15 years ago to be central part of Silk Road initiative and Iran bet on JCPOA instead. China then built elsewhere in Middle East instead.

That’s why the so called 20 year “strategic deal” with China wasn’t worth the paper it was written on! How many years later and what has Iran gotten from that? Nothing strategic about it! China isn’t going to risk their future for Iran’s, whereas Iran risked its entire livelihood for Palestinian cause. Noble on paper sure, but in reality it bankrupted the nation while all of our neighbors prospered at our expense (Azerbaijan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar).

I don’t see why anyone thinks Iran can run to China with no cards in its hands and expect China to align itself with Iran over the wealthier Arabs and the influential Jews. Even if China would entertain such a laughable idea, the amount of concessions Iran would have to give up would be Qajar dynasty level capitulation.

It’s all hypothetical anyway, China has shown no interest in such a relationship. Neither has Russia. Both Russia and China are hedging their bets so that if Iran falls they have some influence in future Iran rather than being completely shut out like Iran is currently with respect to Syria. That’s how pragmatic they are.

even if China had client states, being one would be obviously be better than being a US client state.

China is an atheist state that also prosecutes Muslims and throws them into “work camps”. Let’s not act like China is any different than other great powers that came before it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top