…and the response to the European ‘censure’;
I wouldn’t call 1400 IR6 spinners ‘limited’ regardless of when or what. The ‘west’ is calling this ‘limited’ for obvious reasons.those 8 cascades at Fordow were previously planned but never materialised. now they will finally happen
overall, a very limited response by Iran. clearly seeking to avoid escalation
the point is that was an old plan that was never actioned until now, not some new thingI wouldn’t call 1400 IR6 spinners ‘limited’ regardless of when or what. The ‘west’ is calling this ‘limited’ for obvious reasons.
replacing ir-1/2 with IR-anything is positive step at least the newer one in case of power loss instead of going haywire and destroy half Iran enrichment capacity , shutdown properlythe point is that was an old plan that was never actioned until now, not some new thing
I would rather see IR-8s, but replacing all IR-1/2 with IR-6 is a good step too
one less tool for the enemy, indeedreplacing ir-1/2 with IR-anything is positive step at least the newer one in case of power loss instead of going haywire and destroy half Iran enrichment capacity , shutdown properly
it must have been done the last time they sabotaged the facility and p5+1 was informed its the result of one them playing with fire
We know all of that... In some years a pretty good amount are produceable
What are the factual proofs (witness, official speech) etc for saying that?There is no question. Iran already has been armed for ages.
So you have no proof?The ‘factual proofs’ (?) are In the pudding.