ToddE
Trusted Member
I think that 8 X 5kT devices are adequate to give any attacker serious reason for pause.
Imagine even a large country suffering even just 4 hits to counter-value targets. Meaning large population centers.
By the time Trump takes or settles in Oval Office, the 60% enriched content will exceed the quantity required for 90% WGU for roughly ~40 x devices of 1-5 KT yield. That enough deterrent to scare any enemy with Iranian missile delivery system.
Is it happening? we dont know that but what we have confirmation for by IAEA itself is that Iran is rapidly enriching 60% U235 now, roughly 35 KG/month. The question is, what for?
... Such a level of intelligence penetration still failed to stop Iran from building a world-class delivery system that defeated worlds most advanced IADS/ABM shield.
So, how does this happen? ...
I think this could be a case of seeing what you see, and after a while become complacent - such as the establishment of say Iran's own because an IADS/ABM. This is something that progresses at its own pace across the Mid-Plus timeframe..
However, when it comes to nukes, if I was a betting man, I would say that Iran will suffer a debilitating and massive attack if it even tries to breakout. It won't be allowed to even get to the end of such a 'breakout' period. Why, because there will inevitably be a leak somewhere.
"massive attack" cant stop nuclearization, if anything it would rather motivate a decaying political system to weaponize at a more rapid pace. The Iranian revolution would have died an imploding death in 1980s had Saddam not attacked Iran with Western and USSR backing. The nation got rallied around political figures who were not inherently suitable for governing a rich nation. The same will happen again if the nuclear program is touched.
I posit that Russia is unlikely to give Iran nukes. North Korea *might* be so persuaded, because they do not give a dime about international sensitivities or sentiments. A nominal number (8?) will not dent their inventory.
Piet
Russia, Iran, DPRK have no nuclear relations with each other.


