Tijani
Registered Member
I originally answered your "Demographic become older is not bad".
Without an population increase it matters little if provide all that is beneficial in life. What are you doing it for if your population is declining? Just look at the Asian societies of Japan and South Korea, not to mention almost all of Europe.
Societal betterment those not take precedent over population increase. This is a fallacy propagated by the zionist West to their own detriment.
Your views are conflicting. Retiring at 45-50 is a sigh of a society supporting population welfare. If you believe that engaging in wage labour until in your late sixties is a sign of progress then that's on you.
Iranians are some of the most educated people's on the planet. Your argument holds no merit. Your logic is flawed. You wish to sacrifice the future for the temporary benefit of those in the present.
You're once again contradicting yourself. Iranians are apparently relatively well off enough for population decline to set in. Living standards, education and health is relatively good for people to feel secure enough about life without having to rely on the future generations.
This is utter nonsense! When your population increases so does the most productive segment of the labour force. The negative aspect of productivity will eventually be offset by the increased activity of a youthful population. This is inevitable.
Sheer population is a metric of power. The sheer size of a population matters even if they the country is relatively poorer in per capita comparison.
Stop conflating this is issue with the zionist occupying regime. The situation is different but even there the occupying entity is facing the same demographic issues. The occupation has no chance against the demographic replacement rate of the Palestinians. It is doomed to be replaced no matter what it does by the sheer number of future Palestinians. That is why the zionist West is hellbent on ethnic cleansing.
If you believe this then you haven't read anything I wrote. Nowhere did I postulate such a thing. These are your views but since you brought it up let me please provide by arguments.
Technology doesn't win wars. This is a prevalent misconception. If this was the case then Germany and Japan would've won all the major wars they were engaged in during the last century. Doesn't matter how advanced your systems are if you lack the youthful population to fight your wars. I not against the technological advancement of Iran, on the contrary, but believing in only technology is to ones detriment. Wars are fought with boots on the ground no matter how advanced the adversary. Go check out the conflict in Ukraine.
