Is China encroaching upon Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh?

[Vikramaditya1]

Han is just dozens of ethnic groups in China, Is India of just one ethnic group?

Isn't Han officially recognised as ethnic group.

The map is linguistic composition not ethnic Ethnic awadhi

 

[Vikramaditya1]

Only fools believe that. a "referendum" under foreign occupation, you know it was a scam, don't you?

Says you. Like I said you have zero understanding of history of this region. If you call a Sikkimese Chinese, it's a slur.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Says you. Like I said you have zero understanding of history of this region. If you call a Sikkimese Chinese, it's a slur.

If you call anyone an Indian, it's a slur in every country.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Isn't Han officially recognised as ethnic group.

The map is linguistic composition not ethnic Ethnic awadhi

Does India have just one "Indian" ethnic group? Han Chinese is just one of China's dozens of ethnic groups.

 

[Vikramaditya1]

If you call anyone an Indian, it's a slur in every country.

You sound like a kid! Just mirroring, as if it's an insult. It's true, if you call someone from North East India as Chinese it'll greatly offend them. Imagine being a country known as ethnic slur. The fact is nobody not even Sikkim or Arunachali people like the Chinese or even detest being called a Chinese. But you, the real Chinese think somehow they all want to join China. That's just counter productive don't you think?

 

[Beijingwalker]

You sound like a kid! Just mirroring, as if it's an insult. It's true, if you call someone from North East India as Chinese it'll greatly offend them. Imagine being a country known as ethnic slur. The fact is nobody not even Sikkim or Arunachali people like the Chinese or even detest being called a Chinese. But you, the real Chinese think somehow they all want to join China. That's just counter productive don't you think?

If they all want to be Indians, how come there are so many insurgency and rebel groups in that region? Tibet per capita income is over 11,000$ and Indians just one fifth of that, common sense tell people want to be with rich folks unless they are crazy or helplessly brainwashed.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Vikramaditya1]

If they all want to be Indians, how come there are so many insurgency and rebel groups in that region? Tibet per capita income is over 11,000$ and Indians just one fifth of that, common sense tell people want to be with rich folks unless they are crazy or helplessly brainwashed.

Because they are tribalistic and has inter tribal issues. Insurgencies and rebels are ones who want to have their own tribal kingdoms. Nagas want their little region for themselves and don't want Meteis in it, khas want something else and so on and so forth. Nobody gives a shit about your muh per capita income. Your PLA step foot in their territory they will kill you and make the little Han head a trophy in their shelf because you encroached in their land. They don't care about your Yunan province or Han blood.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Your PLA step foot in their territory they will kill you and make the little Han head a trophy in their shelf because you encroached in their land. They don't care about your Yunan province or Han blood.

PLA pushed far into Indian plain in 1962, not just a foot, why we didn't have that nightmare as you claimed?

 

[ety]

PLA pushed far into Indian plain in 1962, not just a foot, why we didn't have that nightmare as you claimed?

Lol, they welcomed PLA in 1962 instead. Some people just like to lie.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

If they all want to be Indians, how come there are so many insurgency and rebel groups in that region? Tibet per capita income is over 11,000$ and Indians just one fifth of that, common sense tell people want to be with rich folks unless they are crazy or helplessly brainwashed.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Should we consider this video as a valid source as well?

Oh wait—you’ll probably say it’s Western propaganda or biased. But if we accept sources only when they support our position, how can we have an objective discussion?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Similar individual videos can be posted for many countries where a few people are doing and supporting insurgency.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Should we consider this video as a valid source as well?

Oh wait—you’ll probably say it’s Western propaganda or biased. But if we accept sources only when they support our position, how can we have an objective discussion?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Similar individual videos can be posted for many countries where a few people are doing and supporting insurgency.

LOL, They were born in India and most never set a foot in Tibet, besides, there are no rebel and insurgency groups in China, very unlike India.

Post in thread 'March. 28. People all across Tibet celebrate 66th Slave And Serf Emancipation Day in Tibet'

Mar 29, 2025

Serfs' Emancipation Day, observed annually on 28 March, is a holiday in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China that celebrates the emancipation of serfs in Tibet. The holiday was adopted by the Tibetan legislature on 19 January 2009 and it was promulgated that same year.

In modern Tibetan history, the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai declared the dissolution of the Tibetan government on 28 March 1959 and he replaced it with the temporary Preparatory Committee for the Tibet Autonomous Region (PCTAR)...

• Beijingwalker

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

LOL, They were born in India and most never set a foot in Tibet, besides, there are no rebel and insurgency groups in China, very unlike India.

Post in thread 'March. 28. People all across Tibet celebrate 66th Slave And Serf Emancipation Day in Tibet'

Mar 29, 2025

Serfs' Emancipation Day, observed annually on 28 March, is a holiday in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China that celebrates the emancipation of serfs in Tibet. The holiday was adopted by the Tibetan legislature on 19 January 2009 and it was promulgated that same year.

In modern Tibetan history, the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai declared the dissolution of the Tibetan government on 28 March 1959 and he replaced it with the temporary Preparatory Committee for the Tibet Autonomous Region (PCTAR)...

• Beijingwalker

I just posted one sample, do you mean to post other example videos as well?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Beijingwalker]

I just posted one sample, do you mean to post other example videos as well?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I also just post one, there are many foreign travelers vlogs about Tibet on youtube, go and check them for yourself if you are really interested about learning what today's Tibet is really like.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=travel+in+tibet

 

[Master Chief]

If Pakistan and China genuinely want a peaceful solution, then Pakistan can give up the areas of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan under its control, while China can withdraw from Aksai Chin. The issue would be solved.

You keep portraying Pakistan and China as if they are the only countries genuinely interested in peace, but I would like to see that commitment reflected in reality—not just in words.

If we look at the historical facts, the Kashmir conflict began in 1947 when Pakistan-backed forces attempted to take control of the independent Jammu and Kashmir. Later, China also took control of Aksai Chin and useless claims for other parts of India. Yet you are saying, indian gets pleasure with this conflicts

If we are going to discuss peace and a solution, then we should look at the actions and responsibilities of all sides, not portray India as the only culprit

Save this diarrhoea for the floor of the doctor's office, if not an appropriate discussion thread regarding the events of 1947. The Jammu pogroms are well documented antecedent historical fact. I have discussed at length the meetings between Golwalkar and Hari Singh on the relevant thread. No need to touch on this matter here.

 

[Vikramaditya1]

PLA pushed far into Indian plain in 1962, not just a foot, why we didn't have that nightmare as you claimed?

1962 was 60+ years back when we didn't even use proper air force. But regardless Indian Army won't play football with Han heads I'm talking about Tribal North East militants who are very active along the borders. Words are Indian agencies are paying them for plausible deniability.